呵呵呵呵呵呵呵 2022-09-08

Currently, it seems that the review speed is quite fast.
August 24th: Submitted
August 24th: Under review
September 7th: Pending decision, received feedback from four reviewers. Two of them were quite positive, giving a full "yes" recommendation. The other two reviewers provided some suggestions for my paper, mainly regarding textual modifications, such as adding references and describing method comparisons.

zunyi 2022-09-07

Waited anxiously, opened the comment section countless times to see everyone's status, finally received it.

Submitted on July 25th, reviewed externally on the 26th,
Major revision on August 22nd, deadline to return the revised version within a week.
Submitted major revision on August 30th.
Minor revision on September 2nd.
Returned on September 4th.
Accepted on September 7th.

joey16 2022-09-07

Yes, a major overhaul.

NaUsta_@ 2022-09-07

Translated text: If it's been more than a day without a review, it's probably a rejection.

yuibo 2022-09-04

Was there no process of discussion? Was it a direct overhaul given on the 2nd?

joey16 2022-09-02

9.2 Pending major revisions.

joey16 2022-09-01

Send an email to the assistant editor.

SCIplus 2022-08-30

Around one month is normal, there is no need to worry. Most of the journals that have passed the initial review can be accepted.

随梦扁舟 2022-08-28

How can I urge for the manuscript? I have sent two emails to remotesing@mdqi.com but have not received any response.

joey16 2022-08-28

Sent a reminder email, half an hour later it became "Pending decision."

joey16 2022-08-28

7.29 Submit
7.29 Under review
8.28 Under review

Translation:
7.29 Submit
7.29 Under review
8.28 Under review

joey16 2022-08-28

Submitted on 7.29, it is still under review.

科研垃圾cc 2022-08-26

I had just been there for a month, and I received three sets of review comments. The comments from the third reviewer were uploaded on the same morning.

siyuanma 2022-08-26

Submitted on July 29th, one major revision and two minor revisions within 15 days, accepted on August 24th.

yuibo 2022-08-23

Can't you see the reviewer's comments when the status is "under review"? It has been more than 20 days already.

dadatong 2022-08-21

It has been 50 days since there has been no progress. I'm frustrated. Why can some people see their opinions one by one, while others have to wait until the pending decision to see them together?

Cabot 2022-08-20

My pending decision has been 5 days, how about yours?

丽丽大熊 2022-08-20

May I ask how often SCI retrieval is generally seen after online publication?

老TJ 2022-08-17

Brother, may I ask what is your current status now?

老TJ 2022-08-17

Excuse me everyone, why is RS so slow now? I have been waiting for several days and it is still pending review. Is it because of the holiday?

The Müller Award 2022-08-16

Let's commemorate it. I previously published an article on the direction of deep learning and multimodal fusion, which went very smoothly and was only slightly modified once to achieve success. The second time was a bit bumpy. On August 13th, I submitted a special topic, but it was rejected on the third day for unknown reasons. On the same day of the rejection, I immediately changed the topic and resubmitted it to a new special topic. After the weekend, it was sent for review today (August 16th). There are four innovative points, and I personally feel that it should not have been rejected, so I resubmitted it quickly. Some netizens were accurate in saying that if there is no response from the assistant editor within two working days, it means the paper has been rejected. At first, I didn't believe it. I personally think that when submitting a manuscript, it may be better not to choose China as the region, as it is more likely to be rejected. In addition, the scope of the special topic should be highly consistent to increase the chances of being reviewed.

Cabot 2022-08-16

3.9投专刊 - Submitted to special issue on March 9th.
3.12拒稿 - Rejected on March 12th.

老TJ 2022-08-15

How is it now? Is it still pending review?

The Müller Award 2022-08-13

Is the editorial department on vacation? I submitted an article on the 10th and it has been pending review. I sent an email but received no reply.

dadatong 2022-08-12

It has been a month since I submitted the application, but I still haven't received any news. I followed up a few days ago, and the admissions office said they were on vacation again. Now the process is very slow.

Ambition™ 2022-08-10

8.10 Pending review
8.10 Under review

小鹏鹏同学呀 2022-08-03

20200802-pending review translates to "20200802-pending review" in English.

20200803-under review translates to "20200803-under review" in English.

SCIplus 2022-08-01

Before submitting to this journal, I had already submitted through another journal in the same field of remote sensing, so I couldn't escape the fate of rejection. Later, I urgently applied for a PhD and only then did I submit to RS!!! Initially, I couldn't sleep at night because I was reading everyone's experiences, and now I have come to fulfill my wish! I wish everyone success!! Let's go for it!!

I submitted a remote sensing image processing paper. If you have any questions, feel free to ask and I'll be glad to help!

After being rejected by a top-tier journal, I made steady improvements for two months, with the following timeline:

6.23 - Submitted manuscript
6.24 - Initial review
6.24 - External review
7.7 - Received reviewers' comments (5 yes!!)
7.14 - Received comments from two more reviewers (5 can; 3 yes, 2 can)
7.26 - Editor provided minor revision requirements and gave 5 days to respond (not sure why it took so long to consider)
7.30 - Resubmitted
7.31 - Accepted by the editor
7.31 - Payment
7.31 - Acceptance notification

Goodman- 2022-07-29

This journal is a bit strange, isn't it? Why are articles with less than 18 pages classified as technical notes for submission?

Wayne06 2022-07-28

I submitted it before, but it was rejected twice directly. After I made some modifications the third time, I was assigned an editor and then began waiting for external review for about a month. Three experts provided feedback, which was quite objective and pointed out many existing issues accurately. After a major revision, I went through a minor revision as well. The process was quite difficult, but fortunately, it was accepted.