ozoz 2021-04-08

After minor repairs, hired.

Tikiten 2021-04-03

2021.3.19 Submission
2021.3.30 Major revision
2021.4.2 Returned revised manuscript, accepted two hours later

I didn't expect my first article in life to be accepted so quickly. Although it required major revision, the reviewer's comments were all positive, and the changes were minor. What's amazing is that it was accepted on the same day it was resubmitted. It seems like the editor made the decision without even consulting the reviewer. It surprised both my teacher and my senior colleagues. It's a great start to my doctoral career, and I'm very happy!

kydog 2021-04-03

1.18 Submission
2.11 Major revision
2.23 Minor revision and return
2.28 Acceptance
3.2 Published

243034458 2021-04-02

May I ask if the second round of review comments after your major revision is satisfactory?

ozoz 2021-04-01

2021.2.26 Submission
2021.3.5 Major revision
2021.3.13 Early morning revision
2021.3.18 Pending editing decision
2021.4.1 No news so far

ozoz 2021-04-01

I am also waiting for the editor to decide, it has been two weeks.

雨落凡尘 2021-04-01

2020.3.9 Submission
2020.3.10 Under review
2020.3.16 Received after two minor revisions, one rejected - with option to resubmit, but the editor gave a major revision
2020.3.30 Revised and under review
2020.3.31 Second review by one reviewer, stating not happy with the reply provided
2020.4.1 Accepted

slfbhiai 2021-03-29

2021.03.29 Received

CynthiaChenH 2021-03-27

2021.01.27 Submission
2021.02.18 First-round major revision
2021.03.08 Revised (17 days)
2021.03.17 Second-round minor revision
2021.03.21 Revised
2021.03.22 Awaiting editor's decision
2021.03.26 Accepted for publication

slfbhiai 2021-03-26

2021.03.02 Submission
2021.03.13 First-round major revision (11 days)
2021.03.23 Revised (10 days)
2021.03.24 Second-round minor revision (1 day)
2021.03.24 Revised
2021.03.26 Revised version review

Winer1313 2021-03-25

It has been 10 days since the first feedback was returned, and it is still in the "Pending editor decision" status. Can we send a message to urge it? Does anyone have any relevant experience?

BBKBing 2021-03-22

Applied in August 2020, encouraged to reapply after rejection, went on a field trip during the period and had a difficult time catching up upon return. Reapplied in early February 2021, underwent a major overhaul in early March for 10 days. Immediately after the major overhaul, a minor repair was carried out and completed in one day, followed by acceptance the next day.

whj8810 2021-03-22

Posted for 40 days, it has been under review status since submission. During this period, I contacted them and received feedback from 3 reviewers, but I am still waiting for the opinions of the other two without any news so far.

v111 2021-03-21

Is it normal for the status to be "under review" after submitting for a month? Can I expedite the process? I'm really conflicted.

xiaopangge 2021-03-20

My reply to you is exactly the same.

xiaopangge 2021-03-20

May I ask where you found the contact information for the editorial department? Could you please inform me? I sent an email inquiry through the system, and the recipient mentioned that they are from MDPI. They specifically asked me to contact the editorial department, but did not provide any contact information.

xiaopangge 2021-03-20

May I ask where you found the contact information for the editorial department? Could you please let me know? I sent an email inquiry through the system and the recipient said they are from MDPI. They asked me to contact the editorial department directly, but I couldn't find any contact information. The status of my submission has been pending review.

Andrea Goldsmith 2021-03-19

It is normal for the editor not to submit for review. The positioning of the article and the journal does not match, and the quality of the article does not meet the standards. The editor believes it is unnecessary to waste the reviewer's time, so it is not submitted for review. The problem lies in your article.

希望早日毕业的渣渣 2021-03-10

Thank you all for your opinions, and we have hired the candidate.
Although the reviewers' opinions were all positive, the initial review took over 50 days, and the hiring process took nearly 90 days, encountering many difficulties and obstacles.
The second review took almost a month, and "pending editor decision" took nearly two weeks. After contacting the section managing editor, the decision was made by a different academic editor, and the candidate was hired three days later.

243034458 2021-03-09

Bro, is your section or issue column blank, or did it get assigned to a specific section or SI?

超超111111 2021-03-08

Do I need to write a cover letter when submitting?

whj8810 2021-03-07

Posted on February 10, 2021, the submission has been under review status since then and there has been no news so far. I don't know if it has been sent for review.
In the meantime, the system sent an email saying that the editor has been changed, but the article number in the email notifying the change of editor is different from the article number in the submission system. I emailed the editor to inquire about the article number, but I have not received a reply.
Has anyone encountered a similar situation? Requesting an answer.

屠龙者 2021-03-04

Do you have any results now, brother? I am also pending editor decision, it has been 8 days.

tutulili 2021-03-02

You can contact the assistant editor in this situation, ask about the specific situation. The assistant editor has a very good attitude since it is open-source after all, and money doesn't come for free.

LeoWan1992 2021-03-01

Shouldn't we reflect on the problems in our own paper? There must be significant issues with the paper, and if we don't make revisions and resubmit, it will only lead to continuous rejections!

希望早期毕业的渣渣 2021-03-01

The first review took more than 50 days, and now it has been almost a month since the second review. What's going on?
May I ask, is it normal for "pending editor decision" to last for two weeks?

RainMan 2021-02-24

On January 26, 2021, three weeks later, I received Xiao Xiu's comments on the manuscript, and then a week later, I received an acceptance letter. Indeed, it was very fast. There were three reviewers, the first one provided me with more detailed revision suggestions, including punctuation modifications. The other two reviewers only provided relatively general revision suggestions.

li1214 2021-02-22

I submitted twice. The first time, there were four reviewers and they provided more than 50 comments. After two rounds of revisions, the editor requested a resubmission with additional data. For the second submission, it was still sent to the same reviewers. After a few days, they provided minor revisions and the paper was accepted. The entire process took nearly 2 and a half months. Both the reviewers and the editor were very proactive and efficient. The reviewers had high expectations and demands.

北冰洋下棋的川谷 2021-02-20

First submission: 20210101 Submission, rejected due to incorrect email address of the corresponding author.
Resubmission: 20210103 submission
Initial review comments announced: 20210204, three reviewers, a total of 12 review comments (originally there were four reviewers, one of whom never submitted review comments, and the editorial department no longer waited for their review comments).
Submit revised paper: 20210214
Paper acceptance: 20210218
Editor Decision——
Decision: Accept in current form
Comments: The Authors did a good job in reviewing the paper. Thus, it can be accepted in its current form.

一根鸡丝儿 2021-02-12

Do you think water can be spared?