学术菜鸟 2021-10-02

There should be no big problem, it will definitely hit!

学术菜鸟 2021-10-02

2021-09-27, accepted offer.

Bear547 2021-10-01

2021.9.30 17:53 Minor Revisions (to be revised and returned at 8:30 PM)
2021.9.30 22:29 Accepted for publication
Wishing everyone a happy National Day and smooth research!

jaycheney 2021-09-30

8.25 pending review means that it is awaiting evaluation.
8.26 under review means that it is currently being evaluated.

Bear547 2021-09-30

Submission experience:
2021.8.25 submitted to journal
2021.9.16 major revision (three reviewers, two minor revisions, one major revision, but the major revision actually just added a constraint on the research scope, nothing else, felt like a minor revision but the editor classified it as a major revision)
2021.9.23 revision submitted to journal
2021.9.24 revised version review
2021.9.30 pending editor decision (reviewers had no comments except for one suggesting a word change)
Luckily, there is no national holiday in foreign countries, looking forward to acceptance before the national holiday.

denglongyun 2021-09-28

Can this journal be resubmitted after the initial review rejection?

TTTong 2021-09-28

A reviewer's response was received on September 24th, and there is no response from the other two reviewers. The status was then changed to "pending editor decision." It has been four days now, and I'm getting a little anxious.

TTTong 2021-09-26

2021.8.7 submitted
2021.8.8 reviewed
2021.9.11 major revision
2021.9.23 major revision submitted

学术菜鸟 2021-09-26

The problem shouldn't be big.

学术菜鸟 2021-09-26

Then I will also record it:
2021-08-24 pending review
2021-08-25 under review
2021-09-13 pending decision
2021-09-14 pending major revisions
2021-09-24 Resubmitted
2021-09-24 Revised Version Received
2021-09-24 Revised version review
2021-09-25 Pending editor decision

WZY 2021-09-25

Did you only find out the result after such a long time?

QT_balala 2021-09-25

The special issue on deep ocean remote sensing, which was submitted on 7.4, has now been accepted.

doctor_su 2021-09-24

"Under review, is it being reviewed or in the hands of the editor?"

碧海星空 2021-09-16

This is just a rejection template, and rejections are written this way after peer review.

lueluelue 2021-09-16

We are writing to inform you that we will not be able to process your submission further. Submissions sent for peer-review are selected on the basis of discipline, novelty, and general significance, in addition to the usual criteria for publication in scholarly journals. Therefore, our decision is not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your work.

We rejected it directly during the internal review, and looking at this rejection reason, it is quite inexplicable. Isn't it innovative enough?

保护我方输出 2021-09-15

May 19, 2021: Submission
July 8, 2021: Rejection and resubmission
July 30, 2021: Resubmission
September 7, 2021: Major revision
September 14, 2021: Acceptance

Overall, the process was relatively fast, but not as fast as expected. The external expert reviewer may not be familiar with this field, so the issues in the major revision did not seem to be very relevant to the research content. However, in order to be accepted as soon as possible, I made all the modifications as suggested. I hope everyone will have good luck~

WZY 2021-09-15

Has it been this long now?

loveforever 2021-09-14

2021.6.11 submitted to journal
2021.6.12 with editor
2021.6.14 under review
2021.7.6 under review
2021.7.13 under review
2021.7.29 under review
2021.8.8 under review
2021.8.27 major revised (Two reviewers, one provided minor revisions directly, the other didn't explicitly state, but seemed positive. Not sure why it ended up as major revisions, sigh)
2021.9.13 Revision Submitted to Journal
Looking forward, eagerly waiting, my dear ones.

千里独行 2021-09-14

Did you finally get hired?

WZY 2021-09-12

What special issue did the original poster submit?

WZY 2021-09-12

Record the special issue of urban remote sensing submitted on September 7th.

QT_balala 2021-09-06

May I ask how to interpret a few "yes"? Underneath my "yes" options, for example, 3 out of 5 options have checkmarks, 2 out of 5 are blank, and there is nothing else. So, should I consider it as 0 "yes" or 2 "yes"?

QT_balala 2021-09-06

I submitted a special issue of RS on July 4th, and only received the comments from the first and second reviewers on August 23rd. The comments from the third reviewer were received on August 28th.

TTTong 2021-09-05

May I ask if there is any news?

22hao 2021-09-03

The first review took about 20 days, with four reviewers in total: one must, two can, and the rest all yes. Two reviewers gave a full YES, one suggested that improving English writing skills would be beneficial, but the editor still recommended significant revisions. It took 10 days to make the modifications and receive feedback, and one week later, acceptance was indicated. Overall, the process went relatively smoothly, except for the delayed response from the last expert's opinion, which came out after I had already made the changes.

弓长广文武 2021-08-31

Worship the master, hug the master's thigh.

弓长广文武 2021-08-31

The text "楼主好厉害，我好喜欢" translates to "You are so impressive, I really like it" in English.

wyuan1 2021-08-30

8.30 directly receive after major repairs.

复旦大学Nancy 2021-08-29

2021.7.26 Submission
2021.8.19 Minor revisions - Experts' feedback can be viewed in the system in advance. One expert returned on August 12th, providing 5 "yes" and 2 modification suggestions. Another expert returned on August 15th, providing 3 "yes" and 2 "can" along with 12 modification suggestions. The editor requires revisions to be completed within 5 days.
2021.8.25 Submitting revisions - Although it was a minor revision, due to the need to improve based on each comment, the workload was quite heavy. I worked two nights extra, but still didn't have enough time, so I applied for a 2-day extension to submit. In the end, nearly 70% of the content was changed. The second half of the introduction was rewritten (2 days), a summary paragraph and a flowchart were added to the methodology section (1 day), two large figures and textual analysis were added to the results section (2.5 days), and the discussion section was supplemented with limitations explanation, etc. (0.5 days).
2021.8.26 Accepted

致富大仙 2021-08-23

8.23 Reject and Resubmit