军哥93 2022-12-22

The self-quotation rate is a bit high.

siwei huang 2022-12-22

"Chinese Academy of Sciences, you've had enough. It's not fun anymore to play with partitioning like this."

tumuge13 2022-10-23

The format is completely different from other journals (double-blind review, cover page, references, and signatures of each author). I spent a week modifying the format, but luckily it was quickly rejected with the reason that it does not meet the scope of inclusion. I will not attempt it again in the future.

likyoo 2022-10-11

This journal does not have a Word/LaTeX template, so I spent a long time modifying the PDF and submitted it. However, it was returned saying that typesetting was not necessary.

The article I submitted was related to agriculture and computer science. The reviewer's comments were unprofessional, with most of the opinions having obvious common sense errors, except for one or two minor language issues.

The reviewer listed a bunch of papers that must be cited and compared, but the cited papers had very low citation counts and covered various areas, including but not limited to medicine, traditional machine learning, and image super-resolution.

The editor directly rejected the submission.

beautiful123 2022-07-07

This, unexpectedly giving advice in Chinese?

szw 2021-12-14

May I ask how the layout fee is charged? Is it charged per article or per page?

szw 2021-08-23

This is too slow, it took five months to send it for external review, and it has already been a month waiting for the results...

xina 2021-07-09

The submission editing process is fast, but I am frustrated with the reviewers. They gave me feedback in Chinese, which I tolerated, but they directly said that nothing has any meaning and that my research is unnecessary. Perhaps I didn't highlight the key points in my writing, or maybe the reviewers didn't carefully read the article. The reviewers always take almost half a day or less to provide me with their review comments.

nobodyno 2021-05-18

Thank you for the editor's prompt handling. One manuscript received a rejection notice within a week, while another manuscript received an acceptance notice within 2 months. After that, it was given priority for online publication, and it can also be seen on Google Scholar. Wishing JIA continued success!

nobodyno 2021-05-07

Reply to maryexe: Just select YES, JIA waives the OA fees for all manuscripts that pass the final review, but page charges are required.

h70w 2021-05-03

Posted on December 1, 2020
Edited and rejected on December 10, 2020
The speed is acceptable, but the main concern is the adopted analysis method.

5555555 2021-04-10

Low-income countries can apply, but China is basically not eligible for this, so don't choose it.

maryexe 2021-04-10

May I ask, do you want to select yes or no for this? JIA is a fully Open Access (OA) journal on ScienceDirect, and all accepted articles will be published as OA. Authors have the option to apply for waiving the Open Access (OA) fee, in which case the fee will be covered by us. Would you like to apply for waiving the OA fee?

xiaobai1 2021-03-30

I will no longer submit to this journal in my lifetime.

szw 2021-03-13

It has been two months since I submitted, and there is still no news. Holding onto myself.

笑纳接受 2021-01-15

Only represents personal views.
The two-year field experiment showed no significant results. I submitted the manuscript at the end of April and received revisions in early October. I only made one round of revisions and accepted it in December. Overall, the external review process was a bit slow, but it went much smoother than I expected. The editor was very responsible and the entire process from submission to final proofreading took very little time. I will consider submitting again in the future. I wish the journal's impact factor will continue to rise.