xxyyyyy 2022-11-18

May I ask what does "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" three times mean? Does it signify the appointment of three different peer reviewers?

科研汤 2022-11-13

2022.9.5 submit
2022.9.11 awaiting reviewer assignment
2022.9.12 awaiting reviewer selection
2022.10.10 awaiting reviewer assignment
2022.10.11 awaiting reviewer selection
2022.11.9 awaiting reviewer assignment
2022.11.9 awaiting reviewer selection
2022.11.9 awaiting reviewer scores

Translation:
2022.9.5 - Submitted
2022.9.11 - Awaiting reviewer assignment
2022.9.12 - Awaiting reviewer selection
2022.10.10 - Awaiting reviewer assignment
2022.10.11 - Awaiting reviewer selection
2022.11.9 - Awaiting reviewer assignment
2022.11.9 - Awaiting reviewer selection
2022.11.9 - Awaiting reviewer scores

科研汤 2022-10-01

Hello friend, may I ask how long the process of "awaiting reviewers selection" usually takes? It has been a month now and the status hasn't changed.

科研汤 2022-10-01

Dude, why is this journal still in "awaiting reviewer section" status even after a month of submission? May I ask when the different stages of your submission were?

噜噜噜噜噜噜 2022-09-27

Reply after five months, rejected.

GreenEli 2021-09-20

I checked the replies and there were a total of three reviewers. The first one gave fewer suggestions (minor revisions), the second one gave more suggestions (major revisions), and the last one had no comments. Finally, the editor gave a rejection.

nobody_0 2021-07-11

I never expected that a journal with an impact factor of around 1 would give me the feeling of submitting to a top IEEE journal.

nobody_0 2021-07-11

Before submitting, I specifically downloaded the relevant papers from this journal. After reading them, I found that they were poorly written, so I confidently submitted my own paper.

Review results:

Submitted in January 2021, received a response for the first review in July 2021, 6 months for the first review to be completed.

There were 3 reviewers, 2 were positive with not many modifications suggested, and they even provided related articles for citation. The remaining 1 reviewer was negative, emphasizing the lack of theoretical content and insufficient contribution.

Associate Editor: Suggested acceptance after revisions.

Action Editor: Rejected and prohibited from resubmission.

Conclusion: The review process was excessively long and the journal lacked any sense of human touch.

In other foreign journals, a situation like this would usually allow for major revisions or a chance to resubmit. However, not only did this journal delay for 6 months, but the rejection was also very thorough.

magarrrr 2021-06-29

Brother, I just submitted this journal. Now I am waiting for the editor to process it. How long does it usually take for the editor to handle it? Thank you for answering!

屁屁飞 2021-06-28

One month of revisions, but it was turned into a letter.
After one month of revisions, it was submitted and accepted within 20 days.