DOCTOR.guoshuai 2022-11-28

I submitted it on October 4th. Currently, it is ready for the editor's decision, but I haven't seen many reviewers. How much longer do I need to wait? Does anyone know?

11 2022-11-24

There's nothing else to wait for, sigh.

康大结实 2022-11-21

There should be the company's phone number in the email, and you can directly call for inquiries.

目标投遍SCI 2022-11-19

Just asking you all, how should I handle it if the invoice from the magazine is missing a few digits in the tax number? Can I contact them to make the amendment?

悲酥清风 2022-11-19

The text translates to: "My article published online on September 25th has not been indexed yet. I checked and the last batch indexed was on September 22nd. Since then, it still cannot be retrieved. How about yours?"

悲酥清风 2022-11-19

Submitted in January 2022, after several months of no response, I was prepared to submit elsewhere. However, I received a reply for the first time in June, and after several revisions, I was accepted in August. The article was published online on September 25th, but it has not been indexed yet. Upon checking, it seems that this journal has not indexed any submissions after September 23rd. Previously, submissions were typically indexed within about two weeks, rarely exceeding one month. I'm not sure what the situation is, so I was wondering if anyone has any insight on this?

LLQ HN 2022-11-18

If the editor indeed said that they are willing to accept the modifications, you can go and ask them about it, as long as there is no problem with the changes you made.

温婉+佩玉鸣鸾+歌舞。 2022-11-13

My feeling is that the review process in the engineering field is very strict. The research I conducted was on the seismic performance of a typical HSR (high-speed rail) bridge tested on a shaking table, in order to evaluate its performance during high-intensity earthquakes (such as the maximum considered earthquake, MCE). There were 57 reviewer comments. Please take a look.

Reviewer Comments:

Reviewer 1
The manuscript under consideration presents an investigation on the seismic performance of a typical RERSCSS (Resilient Reinforced Earthquake Resistant Segmental Concrete Sleeve) pier used in HSRB (High-Speed Railway Bridge) with varying seismic strength and design parameters through a series of shaking table tests.

Reviewer 2
_______
Only 500 characters can be commented, the rest is omitted.

11 2022-11-12

The receipt has been received by email. May I ask how long it will take to retrieve it?

11 2022-11-10

I have been online the next day, but I don't know how long it will take to search?

11 2022-11-10

I also didn't receive the receipt, and there was no reply even after sending an email. I am starting to feel uneasy inside...

caroline2351 2022-11-09

Has your problem been resolved? I also have the same issue, may I ask for some advice?

caroline2351 2022-11-09

I also have the same problem. The name of the organization can only display half. What should I do?

caroline2351 2022-11-09

Employed, it took a total of three and a half months, with one revision in between. The comments provided were quite targeted, and a prompt response will result in a quick acceptance.

ldMarilyn 2022-11-09

Hello, my status is similar to yours. May I ask if the real status at this time is "Editors invite" on the official website or "under review" on the preprint? (I did not choose to publicly publish on the preprint)

Wang Chenchen 2022-11-07

May I ask, how should I handle it when the school name is too long to write on the invoice?

Wang Chenchen 2022-11-07

Already hired, please tell me what to do if the unit name is too long to fit in when filling out the invoice.

xdsfefcrcda 2022-11-04

I hope to share my real experiences with everyone. It's frustrating that some journals don't tell the truth. I hope everyone can avoid such a situation. I have gone through major and minor revisions, and each time I made revisions based on the feedback received. During the minor revision, the editor-in-chief mentioned in an email that as long as I made the specified changes, it would be accepted. Eventually, it was revised as required, but still got rejected. During the first major revision, both the editor-in-chief and one reviewer agreed to accept it, but the second reviewer disagreed. In this situation, shouldn't another reviewer be assigned? However, the editor-in-chief didn't do that and instead asked for a minor revision. During the minor revision, it was explicitly stated that once the changes were made, it would be accepted. After completing the revisions, only the reviewer who rejected it was shown the revised version, and it was ultimately rejected. It took 5 months and 6 pages of revision comments, and after completing all the revisions, it was rejected, which is truly frustrating. I mainly don't understand what the editor-in-chief was thinking. The feedback and suggestions given were all reasonable, and we made the required changes. But I don't understand why they thought they could accept it, and one reviewer also thought it could be accepted, but another rejected it. If that's the case, why not reject it from the beginning? After occupying 5 months with major and minor revisions, it was ultimately rejected, which is indeed somewhat unethical. Everyone should be cautious.

姚姚的 2022-11-03

No major revisions, just concise and streamlined language, etc.

姚姚的 2022-11-03

May 9th submission, August 23rd message returned for modification, published on November 2nd.

康大结实 2022-11-02

I will be online on October 27th.

junjie20200506 2022-11-01

I submitted it on October 12th, and until now it still hasn't gone online. May I ask if yours is online now?

jeffvigi 2022-10-26

Direction of rock mechanics, submitted in May, accepted in October, still acceptable. First round of major revision, second round with one suggested revision, accepted after rework.
Editorial decision: Accepted 26 Oct, 2022
Submitted to Scientific Reports 19 Oct, 2022
Editorial decision: Major revision 19 Oct, 2022
Submitted to Scientific Reports 09 Oct, 2022
Editorial decision: Major revision 14 Sep, 2022
Reviews received Received 06 Aug, 2022
Reviewers invited Invitations sent 25 Jul, 2022
Editor assigned 25 Jul, 2022
Editor invited 02 Jun, 2022
First submitted 26 May, 2022

NJ98 2022-10-25

Hello, may I ask about the payment issue? Thank you!

DOCTOR.guoshuai 2022-10-23

Is it necessary to wait for such a long time?

康大结实 2022-10-22

Every day of waiting has become a bit impatient, increasingly anxious~

ReturnYG 2022-10-22

I replied to the offer of employment after approximately one month.

ReturnYG 2022-10-22

I submitted it on October 5th, and it went online on October 20th.

ZZong 2022-10-22

I waited for three months.

康大结实 2022-10-21

Dear all, may I ask how long it takes for the submission of proofs to be published online? I submitted my proofs on October 7th, but they have not been published online yet. Should I remind them?