CUIxiaolin 2023-02-04

People only invite, reviewers may not necessarily agree to review.

Notus 2023-02-03

I also found more than ten, and in the end, only three remained.

熊雄 2023-02-03

This review process is a bit convoluted, we need to communicate well with the journal.

熊雄 2023-02-03

After looking at the comments on this magazine, the opinions are mixed. However, it has never been featured in the warning periodicals. What do you all think of it?

Dr YS 2023-02-02

I have returned for repair four times already, really speechless.

LR0512 2023-02-02

The process of submitting this article to this journal has been extremely convoluted. First, there was the initial round of revisions, with three reviewers raising dozens of questions, requiring major revisions. After completing the revisions, we resubmitted the article and in the second round, only one reviewer suggested minor revisions, such as abbreviations. After the second round of revisions, which took about two weeks, the editor informed us that the reviewers were satisfied with the revisions, but the editor noticed some grammar issues that needed to be addressed before acceptance. So, we proofread the article and submitted it again. After another two weeks, the editor raised more grammar and other issues that needed further revision. We made the necessary changes and submitted it once again. About a month later, the editor informed us that they were seeking new reviewers, and invited thirteen of them. By this point, our patience had worn thin, so we sent an email requesting to withdraw the article (as it had already been six months since submission). However, the editor tried to persuade us, stating that they had found reviewers who were willing to review the article. So, we temporarily decided not to withdraw. After another two months, we received revision comments from two new reviewers, leaving us feeling frustrated and perplexed. We made the revisions and submitted it again. Then, it seemed like the editor was once again seeking new reviewers, and we haven't received any updates since then. Oh my, this has definitely been the most convoluted submission experience I have ever had. I have never encountered an editor who continuously seeks reviewers, and the suggestions from different reviewers naturally vary. The never-ending cycle of revisions is tiresome. It would have been better if they had just rejected it outright. This editor is truly unprofessional!

天池守望者 2023-02-02

After two months of waiting, it was returned to "Editors invited" status. What's going on... Is there anyone else experiencing the same situation? It feels like an endless wait.

氨酚黄那敏 2023-02-01

I am currently in the same situation. At first, it was said that four reviewers were required, but only two were invited. Currently, it shows that one reviewer report has been received. However, I checked the corresponding author's email and did not see any emails. Does this journal wait for all reviewers' opinions before sending emails? Also, I don't know when the second reviewer's opinion will be returned.

料哥 2023-02-01

Layer owner, what is the current status? It has been almost two months and it is still in peer review.

天池守望者 2023-01-31

Reviewers are invited to quickly communicate about the availability of the next two months.

xiaogaogao 2022-12-23

Hello, I encountered a problem when paying the layout fee. I would like to ask for your advice. Can you please help me with it? Thank you!

小丑① 2022-12-23

Two-month external audit

小丑① 2022-12-23

Within two months, the faster one returned within a week, while mine took one week and another month!

小丑① 2022-12-23

The first reviewer was very prompt and returned the revised comments in just one week. The second reviewer took a month, but still carefully read the article and provided valuable suggestions.

After receiving the feedback, the editor provided major revisions the next day. After completing the revisions, it was sent out again. It took about one and a half months for the external review feedback to come back, requesting minor revisions.

The revisions were sent back within three days and have been accepted. I just received the email today!

sincejulyzz 2022-12-23

I chose personal because I paid with the small boss's credit card.

chenna 2022-12-21

May I ask when it comes to paying the page charge, should I select "my own address" or "my institutional (research institute, university, company, funder) address" for the billing detail? Thank you.

chenna 2022-12-21

May I ask, when paying the page layout fee, should I choose "My own address" or "My institutional (research institute, university, company, funder) address" for the billing detail?

论文练习生1 2022-12-20

Excuse me, how long does the first repair and the second repair take approximately?

小丑① 2022-12-19

I think it was a pretty good submission. The editor was quite nice. The first reviewer agreed, while the second reviewer disagreed. The editor requested major revisions.

After making the modifications, it was sent for external review again. In the second external review, one expert agreed, and another expert suggested minor revisions. The editor asked for the minor revisions.

The minor revisions have already been made and sent back. There shouldn't be any major issues now.

让我中吧. 2022-12-18

Submit a journal article for the first time, not sure how to find the template format. Begging for guidance from all the knowledgeable experts.

淮河烟雨 2022-12-17

I would like to ask how to make a remittance.

sincejulyzz 2022-12-13

Which friend knows how to handle the subsequent proofreading and payment after receiving?

sincejulyzz 2022-12-13

Does anyone know what to do with the subsequent proofreading and payment after receiving the job offer notification?

sincejulyzz 2022-12-13

Hello, I would like to know how long it will take to receive the subsequent payment and sample notification after being hired.

sincejulyzz 2022-12-13

6.24 Submission
10.6 Repair
11.30 Received feedback from Reviewer 1, after a long wait of over a month, received acceptance email on 12.12.

LC@ 2022-12-12

10.20 Submission received - complete
11.18 Initial technical check
11.20 Ongoing peer review
Dear colleagues, could you please provide some guidance on my situation? After reading the comments, I feel like my system is different from everyone else's. Thank you!

Submit-accept 2022-12-08

December 7th. The paper has been accepted. Finally, it has been approved.

wmc 2022-12-06

Did you finally accept it?

WBZNJXJ 2022-12-06

From waiting for half a month for 7 invited reviews, it has now become 13 reviewers invited. The status has remained the same. Is it that we cannot find reviewers? Do we really need all 13 reviewers to review?

chenjiaona 2022-12-01

Waiting for the editor's decision... Waiting is so anxious.
Reviewer reports received / Ready for editor’s decision 01 Dec 22
Reviews received Received 28 Nov, 2022
Submitted to Scientific Reports On 16 Nov, 2022
Editorial decision: Major revision On 04 Nov, 2022
Reviews received Received 02 Nov, 2022
Reviews received Received 13 Sep, 2022
First submitted to Scientific Reports On 08 Sep, 2022