hmg1126 2021-03-08

Editorial decision: Reject after review On 08 Mar, 2021
Editor assigned On 05 Mar, 2021
Editor invited On 18 Jan, 2021
Submission checks complete On 18 Jan, 2021
First submitted to Scientific Reports On 11 Jan, 2021
Promised to pay but disappeared after two months of review. Rejected in just three days, hahaha.

khq 2021-03-05

The suggestions for modification have been sent to the corresponding author's email. Reviewers are usually fixed and unchanged, unless there are conflicting opinions among the reviewers, in which case the editor may invite new reviewers.

fangfei Lee 2021-03-05

It's in the email that the editor sent to you. I have written both reviewers' comments in the email itself, not as an attachment.

yunzhongjie 2021-03-04

Generally, the original reviewer does not conduct the second review. If they have given their approval this time, then it can be accepted.

江月 2021-03-04

It has been 40 days since the submission, and still no editor has been found. Should we remind the editorial assistant?

小伟子 2021-03-02

I would like to ask where to find the comments of the first review returned by the experts. The email I received doesn't specify the opinions of the two reviewers nor include any links. I have looked everywhere but couldn't find them.

fangfei Lee 2021-03-02

After the major revision of the article, it was sent back and the editor sought the original reviewer for further modifications. The status has been "reviewer invited" for almost two weeks. I would like to ask, what would be the result if the reviewer does not accept the review? Would a new reviewer be sought? I am in a hurry as it is needed for graduation.

江月 2021-03-01

The magazine company has sent you an email with a website link to check the progress. Click on it, enter your username and password, and you will be able to access it.

魔卡 2021-03-01

I want to know how to check the progress. Why can't I find the place to check the progress after I submitted it that day?

小伟子 2021-02-26

I have been in this state for 1 month.

农父三拳 2021-02-23

1. It feels a bit slow, I reminded them once in the middle, luckily they didn't reject me.
2. Useful information is always sent through communication, and it takes several attempts to modify and find the right communication operation or forward the email.
3. It is said that the reputation is average. P.S. I want to say that I have read some articles from this journal, and there are many low-quality ones as well as high-quality ones. Don't judge based solely on the journal, it's important to consider the quality of the articles themselves. All journals are the same in this regard.

江月 2021-02-19

26 days since submission, the Editor invitation has been ongoing for 22 days, but still haven't found an editor.

Geehy 2021-02-17

Starting from 2020, the review process has become much slower: it takes one month to find an editor, two months to find reviewers, one month for external review, and four months for three rounds of revisions. The entire process takes 8 months, which is not easy. The reviewers and editors are very meticulous and provide professional comments. They have strict requirements for the methods, results, and charts in the article. However, the processing speed is relatively slow, so it is advised to be cautious in submitting if graduation is urgent.

yunzhongjie 2021-02-17

It's not necessary to charge such a high price. I received over 12,000 for mine, and there was no requirement for language editing. Nowadays, many SCI journals in China charge nearly 10,000, and they are not open access. Publishing an article with color pages can cost seven or eight thousand. But in terms of the journal's impact, I personally think this fee is acceptable.

666hh 2021-02-16

I've had enough of this recently. I saw the editor inviting 20 reviewers, and they all accepted in a short period of time. Ten days ago, three reviewers provided feedback, but the editor did not give any feedback. The status remained as "Reviewer reports received / Ready for editor's decision." Surprisingly, two days ago, three more reviewers accepted. Didn't they only send out 20 invitations? This is my first time submitting to an open platform, and I don't know what this process is all about. I'm really worried.

阿云 2021-02-15

I would like to ask about the research directions in energy economics and power systems. Also, how much is the layout fee?

MWH 2021-02-12

This publication seems to absolutely never reject submissions. After receiving a review invitation, they felt that the author's writing was not perfect enough and rejected it. However, after some time, they surprisingly found that the article had already been published, and the editor was quite daring.

yunzhongjie 2021-02-10

Everyone is engaged in scientific research, so let's be objective when speaking. Each person only reads articles in their own field, while others read from comprehensive journals. From this, it is difficult to evaluate the quality of journals, so it is more straightforward to directly consider the impact factor.

hmg1126 2021-02-09

I'm sorry, but the provided text is a mix of Chinese characters and numbers that don't form a coherent sentence. Could you please provide a complete sentence or a clear context so that I can assist you better?

anglar 2021-02-08

Excuse me, may I ask how long it took for you to receive the editorial comments later? My paper has also been in the "editors invited" status for 40 days, and I am anxiously waiting...

牙医 2021-02-07

HollenCAI is just discussing, but it feels like everyone has a strong hostility. Can you share the articles you have published on Sr? If you haven't published any, how can you make random evaluations?

In addition, the experiments are all strictly repeated three or more times, the results are reliable, and the content is very new, just lacking an animal experiment. The reviewer raised very detailed questions, and I spent several months solidly supplementing the experiments. So as someone who has published, I cannot say that this journal is not good.

HollenCAI 2021-02-06

Yes, Sci.Rep is highly regarded overseas. Everyone takes pride in publishing their work there.

牙医 2021-02-04

Can you please show me some of the speculative articles that you think are high quality? Mainly, we have published articles in our field that are much higher in quality than Frontiers in Immunology (IF=5, Q2). I am genuinely seeking advice because I will be discussing this matter with my boss later, and I am really curious.

DY 2021-02-04

Looking at this matter from a neutral standpoint, both overseas and domestic situations are actually quite similar, with many people who are unclear about the situation. This situation exists worldwide, especially with SR having the reputation of being published in Nature and having a high impact factor. In China, due to the large population, there are relatively more speculative individuals, naturally leading to the observation of various phenomena, whether good or bad, which results in both more supporters and critics. However, the commercial value of SR cannot be denied, along with its impressive business model. It is also undeniable that SR has some good works. However, it cannot be considered a high-quality journal. It is an expensive journal with a high publication volume. If there is a journal that requires a high price to publish and another free journal with similar submission difficulty and point allocation, no one would choose to spend a lot of money to submit to a journal. I have friends around me who have obtained their professional titles solely through publishing in open access journals, including one article in SR. However, a few years ago, he couldn't even publish articles in the fourth quartile, and published very few articles. In recent years, almost all of his publications have been in OA journals, and he finally obtained a senior position. However, this does not mean that his abilities should be dismissed. Some people are simply not good at academics or have difficulty with English. However, they may excel in other areas, such as the ability to transform industry. I just wanted to share the actual social phenomena without any intention of refuting others' opinions. I hope you don't mind.

牙医 2021-02-04

Friends who have left comments, please leave your thoughts on the article about water. I am just curious and would like to discuss it with everyone. Because I have really mastered the techniques in our research building. It is true that the scores for oral exams are generally not high, but our school is also very prestigious, and our teachers are industry leaders. Other research labs also find it difficult to publish articles on chromosome staining in the top dental schools in China. This is purely for discussion, I am really curious.

牙医 2021-02-04

The following text translates to English as:

"I published an SR (scientific research) for my doctoral work. The idea was not open access (OA), but I still needed to spend an extra year conducting experiments since the animal experiment cycle was too long. Therefore, I decided to publish it as an SR.
Due to public opinion in China, I always felt uncomfortable. However, my classmates and teachers around me read my research and published it in an SR, thinking highly of me.
My teacher was also very happy, and I was bewildered.
Then I asked three international students from different countries, and they all thought SR was very famous and good.
I am not trying to whitewash, just stating the fact. I am very curious why there is such a big difference in the perception of SR between China and other countries?!"

LH1023 2021-02-01

I would like to ask if this journal has a submission template?

LH1023 2021-02-01

May I ask if there is a template for submitting manuscripts to this journal?

zmm0222 2021-01-23

How long is the review cycle for this journal? I want to submit now but I don't know how long it will take.

酱油哥哥 2021-01-23

Whether a journal accepts or rejects a submission, one only knows after it has been submitted. It took me almost half a year to complete it.