认证评论 - Scientific Reports
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

Beast F 2021-07-15

How is the reputation of this magazine? A few days ago, the editor-in-chief invited me to join the editorial board...

发文章啊先人 2021-07-12

There are not many people who write articles in elementary school geography. They mainly focus on topics such as the environment and climate. After two major revisions of EPSL were rejected, this one was accepted. I feel good about it, but I also feel that it is not practical because after all, it cannot compare to submitting an article to Lithos, which is a higher-tier journal.

平/ 2021-07-10

My current situation is also, editor evaluating revision.

平/ 2021-07-09

Congratulations to the author. Did the author return for revisions and submit it for review? Or did they accept the revisions and go back directly?

o33 2021-07-07

Submitted in December 2020, notified of revisions in April 2021. Two reviewers provided fair and constructive feedback. It took one week to make revisions and another month before being notified for minor revisions. After making the necessary changes, the paper was accepted. The process took about six months, which may not be considered fast. Opinions may vary, but it does not feel like a watered-down process. However, many individuals who have not submitted papers before might perceive it as such.

nihaojvzipi 2021-07-07

Finally accepted after submitting for 5 and a half months!
Submitted on January 30th.
Received first round of revisions on April 7th.
Resubmitted on April 17th.
Accepted on July 7th.

During this period, I followed up twice and the editor's attitude was very good!
I'm happy, the impact factor is 4.3 now.

海里的淡水鱼 2021-07-06

Now, at least this state must be maintained for over two weeks!!!!!!

CHYX 2021-07-06

One week after submission, the current status is "editor invited". I don't know how long it will take. Does anyone know about the field of geotechnical engineering and pile foundations? Please share some information.

承承麻麻 2021-07-03

I am also in the state of "1 reviewer report received". It has been two months.

tamatama 2021-07-01

Submitted in March 2021, received feedback in May. Three experts reviewed the paper, one rejected it, one suggested minor revisions, and one accepted it directly. The editor provided an opportunity for revisions, and the paper was quickly accepted after resubmission. The processing speed was fast. It is considered a low-impact journal, so it is up to the individual to determine the value of their own research work.

科研大实话 2021-06-30

This journal has been defined as a "trash journal", even if its impact factor rises to 10, it will not change the prejudice of the Chinese towards it! Of course, this journal also has many excellent papers. But the reputation of the journal is indeed very bad in China! Publishing an article in it is even considered a laughingstock in some places academically! To change the Chinese people's perception of it, it may require more than just time...

canceresearch 2021-06-30

2021 Latest Impact Factor 4.379

JUST-XIN 2021-06-29

Fast review speed. The submission was accepted within two months, with one major revision in between.

science blank 2021-06-28

We need to wait for the opinions of the reviewers to come back before the editor can organize and send an email to the corresponding author.

海里的淡水鱼 2021-06-24

It has been half a month since the manuscript was sent for external review, but the results of the review have not yet been received. Currently, it shows that seven reviewers have accepted the review.

lideguo 2021-06-23

The editing process took over a month, but progress has been rapid in recent days. The editing was assigned for external review on the same day, and three experts accepted the invitation to review on the same day. The next day, the external review results were received. I am amazed at how quickly this expert reviewed it. It's a bit overwhelming for me.

-----------------------------------------------

Review #1 received On 22 Jun, 2021
Reviewers agreed On 21 Jun, 2021
Reviewers invited Invitations sent on 21 Jun, 2021
Editor assigned On 21 Jun, 2021
Editor invited On 19 May, 2021
Submission checks complete On 18 May, 2021
First submitted to Scientific Reports On 18 May, 2021

nihaojvzipi 2021-06-23

It has been 2 months and 6 days since the repair, and there is still no news. It is still being assigned for editing...

李八九的爸爸 2021-06-23

My current status is also "only one reviewer's opinion," and it has been going on for more than ten days. I feel like they couldn't find enough reviewers at the beginning, so they put it on hold and forgot about it until now. After all, there are so many submissions.

阳光宅男 2021-06-18

June 18, 2021, 6:13 PM Accepted
Status changed to APC information requested

酸奶有点甜博士1989 2021-06-18

How are you doing?

nihaojvzipi 2021-06-17

It has been 2 months since the return for repair, and the assignment is still being allocated for editing.

lideguo 2021-06-16

I submitted it on May 18th, and until now it is still "Editor invited." Why is it taking so long? I don't know how much longer it will take.

小李子 2021-06-16

Maybe everyone feels that the water bar, there's no way, for survival, I feel that the review process is quite strict.

小李子 2021-06-16

Generally, it is two, approximately one month.

应该努力 2021-06-16

I would like to ask the older brothers and sisters who are familiar with manuscripts. How many reviewers are usually involved? Currently, my manuscript shows that one reviewer has accepted it. How long does it usually take for the review to come back with comments? Thank you all.

阳光宅男 2021-06-15

2021.1.13 Submission
2021.4.27 First review revision: Minor revisions suggested by one reviewer, another reviewer mentioned lack of innovation.
2021.5.7 Returned for revision
2021.6.8 Second review revision, one reviewer from the first review requested modification of a few words.
2021.6.10 Returned for revision
Current status: Editor evaluating revision

海里的淡水鱼 2021-06-14

2021.6.13 1 Reviewer(s) accepted

Translation: On June 13, 2021, 1 reviewer accepted.

llacc 2021-06-13

I have invited the editor for over a month, and recently it has been too slow.

酸奶有点甜博士1989 2021-06-13

I have reviewed it four times...

nihaojvzipi 2021-06-12

Quality check passed
Ready to be assigned to an editor.
It has been like this for 2 months.

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started