一之濑夜 2021-12-09

You can try checking here at https://researcher.nature.com/your-submissions.

LCYu 2021-12-07

May I ask where to check the status after submission?

搞材料的 2021-12-04

It should be mostly of low quality, but there is a need for some good papers, which should account for a very small proportion. How desperate must one be to produce over 20,000 papers in a year?

LouShi 2021-12-02

I conducted a technical review for a week.

记住2018 2021-12-01

Posted on 7/21, received minor revisions from the first reviewer on 8/17, with a total of 4 comments. Revised and returned the next day. On 9/15, the editor requested changes in the formatting and referencing of the article. Revised on 9/21 and received acceptance notification on 10/11.

心怀感恩 2021-11-30

The displayed editor appointed has been 20 days already, why hasn't it been updated yet?

张小米 2021-11-30

Hello, I am also in the field of engineering. May I ask if you have been accepted now?

emily803 2021-11-29

I'm sorry, I am unable to translate the provided text as it contains personal and context-specific information.

nihaojvzipi 2021-11-23

It has been 8 days and there is no news.

zaozao123 2021-11-20

Hiring will take place one month after major repairs. The editor is very efficient; feedback from two experts was received at 4 pm, and it was already accepted by 1 am the next morning.

Liuuuy 2021-11-15

Hello, I would like to ask how long does the technical review process take? I haven't received any updates for five to six days. Thank you.

sdulht 2021-11-08

10.12 submitted
10.17 1 reviewer accepted
1.06 1 reviewer report received
1.06 minor revision
1.29 resubmitted
2.08 editor evaluation
3.18 1 reviewer invited
5.18 1 reviewer report received
5.18 minor revision
5.20 resubmitted
5.21 editor evaluation
6.17 1 reviewer invited
9.15 received

BCX 2021-11-06

Same here, I submitted in June and until now there is only one reviewer. It has been four months already, and I am already considering withdrawing my submission.

黄桂雄 2021-10-13

Is this journal a scam? I submitted my article and then withdrew it. I don't understand why there are still people submitting to it.

Grenzlinie 2021-10-04

6.13 submitted
7.13 1 reviewer accepted
1 reviewer accepted
7.16 1 reviewer report received
8.31 received all reports
8.31 major revision
9.8 resubmitted
9.8 editor evaluation
9.12 2 reviewers invited
9.14 1 reviewer accepted (morning)
1 reviewer accepted (afternoon)
9.27 1 reviewer report received
9.28 Received

This is my first work as a first-year graduate student. I started from scratch and conducted my own research. I am aware of my level and do not expect to publish in a high-end journal. Meeting the graduation requirements is sufficient. Thank you to the journal editor for giving me a chance.

sssssyq‘ 2021-10-04

Save your luck, share the submission process. It was submitted around June 20th, and the editor took a week to find reviewers. There were two reviewers, and their feedback was received in mid to late July. One reviewer had a positive attitude but pointed out many areas that needed improvement. The other reviewer had a harsh tone and demanded significant revisions to the article's structure. After more than a month of modifications, the revised version was returned in mid to late August. The editor spent a few days reviewing it and did not directly accept it but sent it to two reviewers again (probably the same ones as the first round). One reviewer completed the review in a week, while the other took about two weeks. By September 18th, both reviewers' feedback reached the editor, and on September 24th, the decision to accept the article was made.

This article was previously submitted to several journals but was not accepted due to various reasons, wasting more than half a year. Only I know the bitterness I experienced during this time. I am grateful for the tolerance of this journal. I used to think that it was a bit mediocre, but this time, I could feel the reviewers' level of expertise through their feedback. Their suggestions were targeted and helpful for improving the article. Through my first article in life, I have gained some insights. Whether a journal is good or not depends on the overall environment of your laboratory. If your laboratory is top-notch, fellow researchers may look down on submitting to this kind of journal, and naturally, you may consider it mediocre. However, if your laboratory's level is average and you can finally publish one article in this journal through your own efforts, it is still a reward for your hard work. I wish you all good luck and hope you can be successfully accepted by a journal that matches your article's quality.

超嗨小萌葱 2021-10-02

Submitted in July of the 21st year, it has been showing "1 reviewer(s) accepted". What does this mean? When can I expect the results?

长大背包客 2021-09-30

During the submission process, I mistakenly selected to publish a preprint. The editor sent an email requesting submission of a Mini review/Short Communication instead. Will refusing to submit it affect the peer review process? Urgent!!!

心有灵犀 2021-09-24

I feel that this journal has a very strict review process. I have had one paper accepted in 2016, with a total of four rounds of major and minor revisions. The impact factor is also decent, but I'm not sure why it is classified as a third-tier journal.

海里的淡水鱼 2021-09-13

Finally hired, it took nearly five months, with one major revision in between. Although the reviewers didn't raise many questions, they hit the key points of the paper. It was difficult to answer and make the necessary changes. But this also shows that this journal is not as easy as everyone says! However, different people have different opinions! For reference, the submission process is attached below:

First submitted to Scientific Reports On 19 May, 2021
Editor invited On 20 May, 2021
Editor assigned On 10 Jun, 2021
Reviewers invited Invitations sent on 10 Jun, 2021
Reviewers agreed On 20 Jun, 2021
Editorial decision: Major revision On 09 Aug, 2021
Submitted to Scientific Reports On 26 Aug, 2021
Reviewers invited Invitations sent on 02 Sep, 2021
Editorial decision: Accepted On 13 Sep, 2021

馄饨 2021-09-12

Do you need the original data?

我的SCI呢 2021-09-07

May I ask what direction your article is in?

rudie 2021-09-07

"Is it true that a third-tier journal is top?! Are you kidding me?"

LR0512 2021-09-01

The layout fee is a little over 12,000 RMB.

Lucky0805 2021-08-31

Are there any issues with Track your submissions these days? How did my status go back from external review to invited editing state?

古城萧笙 2021-08-31

Hello, host, may I ask how much is the layout fee?

GeoCarto 2021-08-27

Did Scientific Reports decide not to send it for a second review? I submitted a major revision, and now it is being evaluated by the editor after the revisions. Does it mean they will either reject it or accept it without a second review?

zaozao123 2021-08-27

What area are you in?

哈哈哈1992 2021-08-26

The translation of "投了结果未知" from Chinese to English is "the outcome is unknown after submitting."

笑夜独醉 2021-08-26

Editor evaluating revision.