认证评论 - Scientific Reports
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

ylm2021 2022-09-29

Editorial allocation is two months, reviewers are invited for one month, has it not yet reached under reviewer? Is it that slow?

junjie20200506 2022-09-27

6.6 Submission; 7.18 Major revision; 8.22 Return; 9.12 Minor revision; 9.26 Acceptance.

大佬捞一下啊 2022-09-23

I only submitted to this one after being rejected by other publications.

我de豪杰物语 2022-09-23

A 3-zone one, there's no need to endure for a year. Just change it, and besides, it's open-source.

大佬捞一下啊 2022-09-23

Finally recorded, it took three months, and the submission process was agonizing for a year, considering it as an account to oneself.
Accepted On 22 Sep, 2022
Major revision On 09 Aug, 2022
Invitations sent on 20 Jul, 2022
Editor assigned On 20 Jul, 2022
Submission checks complete On 23 Jun, 2022
First submitted to Scientific Reports On 16 Jun, 2022

workday 2022-09-22

5.10 Submission
6.15 Major revision
6.28 Revised
9.05 Minor revision
9.07 Revised
9.20 Accepted
A total of three reviewers were sought. One reviewer's comments greatly improved the article. Another reviewer delayed for over a month and then did not review, wasting time. The editor responded to the email promptly. A third reviewer was found, and the editor's attitude was also good. It is still worth submitting. The publication fee is $2190, expensive.

平凡生活 2022-09-22

The review process of this journal is very standardized, and the requirements for charts and tables are also quite strict. They even ask for the revised version to be sent for external review if it only requires minor revisions after the initial review. This results in a very long review period. However, the quality of articles has improved in the past one or two years, especially in the field of science and engineering, and they are more recognized. But the speed is really slow. It depends on luck whether it can be reviewed within a month. So it is advisable to be cautious when submitting.

沈某某1 2022-09-19

How is your thesis now? Did you submit it in July or is the editor appointed now?

yeah 2022-09-17

What does "正在考虑" mean? Is it looking for an editor or a reviewer?

zche215 2022-09-16

It was submitted in June, and received modifications in early August. After the modifications, it underwent one more minor revision and has been accepted. Overall, the process was relatively fast.

xiejian668 2022-09-15

From July 12th until now, I have been continuously looking for reviewers. It has been over two months.

hbzyydx 2022-09-14

The current status I'm in is "1 reviewer report received," and this status has been ongoing for more than ten days. I sent an email to inquire about it, and they said they couldn't find the second reviewer. I'm wondering if I should continue waiting for the second reviewer's report or if one reviewer's report is sufficient?

bagba 2022-09-13

Excuse me, I am currently in revised requested status, which means I need to make modifications before resubmitting. However, the corresponding author did not receive the email. What should I do? The email address is correct, so could it be because the corresponding author did not register for a Nature account before? How can I find out who the editor of the article is?

bagba 2022-09-13

Come and ask the expert. I have already sent the revision comments to the corresponding author, but the corresponding author did not receive the email... I have checked the provided email and everything seems fine, what should I do? How do I contact the editor? How can I find out who is responsible for your article as the editor? Can someone please help?

你管我 2022-09-13

It's been more than ten days, and I'm still considering. Guys, is this normal?

yeah 2022-09-12

I also submitted it on August 4th and it is still under review. Previously, they sent an email saying they couldn't find a suitable editor and asked me to recommend one. I made a recommendation, but there has been no response. It's too slow.

RLZ 2022-09-10

The reviewer has already received your manuscript and is ready to start reviewing it. As for the speed, it depends on how many reviewers were found. In my case, 3 reviewers accepted and the review process took about a month. After that, it entered the revision stage.

南方小镇 2022-09-10

First time submitting to SCI, not familiar with the process. Can anyone please inform me if "Reviewer(s) accepted" means that the reviewers have agreed to review the manuscript or if they have agreed to publish it? At this stage, how much longer does it usually take to receive the final decision?

wangshown 2022-09-09

I go... Is it so slow?

zn98 2022-09-09

Hello, may I ask if you have submitted the edited document for re-review after the external audit and repair?

李八九的爸爸 2022-09-09

Mine too, it has been two months and it is still inviting edits.....

wangshown 2022-09-09

8.4 editor invited
9.9 editor invited
Is the current water journal also this slow now?

ZZong 2022-09-08

I have been invited for over two months.

xusanle 2022-09-07

I just submitted the manuscript in the morning. At the end, there is a "In Review" service on Research Square, which allows everyone to see the preprint version of the article online and provides a DOI. What is the purpose of this operation?

yeah 2022-09-07

I have also been investing for more than a month. Previously, I was always looking for an editor, but now I cannot access the website.

BXaiueeee儿 2022-09-05

How can I check the progress of my submission if I can't access the website? It has been over a month and I haven't received any updates. I also can't access the submission website. Can someone please provide a link? Thank you!

航海家 2022-09-02

Received the revised email on August 9th, requesting a 14-day revision;
Revised on August 23rd;
Accepted on September 2nd.

唐唐不爱吃糖 2022-08-27

First time submitting to this journal, hoping for smooth progress~
8.23 Manuscript submitted and quality check.
8.25 Quality check completed and manuscript assigned to editor, editor assigned, and reviewers invited.
8.26 2 Reviewers accepted.
8.29 1 Reviewer report received.
9.6 Reviewer reports received/Ready for editor's decision.

神隐幽灵 2022-08-26

I would like to inquire about the submission of revised manuscripts. Should we submit a PDF file with tracked changes, a LaTeX file, and a review comment explanation? For the response to the review comments, do we need to provide a separate file for each reviewer? Also, should the returned LaTeX file include the revisions or not?

麒麒 2022-08-25

Can you please provide more details on where to download the template?

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started