少年与梦- 2022-08-11

7.31 submission
8.1 editor-in-chief
8.2 transferred to deputy editor-in-chief
8.11 still being evaluated by the deputy editor-in-chief
So slow, previously the review process was quite fast, but these two times it takes around 20 days in the hands of the deputy editor-in-chief, it's agonizing...

liven 2022-08-09

5.4投 - 5.4 Submission
5.7送审 - 5.7 Submit for review
5.21一审结果回来，两个小修一大修。编辑给大修 - On 5.21, the results of the first review came back, with two minor revisions and one major revision. The editor requested the major revision.
6.17返回 - 6.17 Return
6.25二审修改一个小细节 - On 6.25, one minor detail was modified in the second review.
6.26返回当天接收 - On 6.26, it was received on the same day.

liweiliwei 2022-08-01

Allocated to domestic editor Ma.., feeling very disappointing, it's been almost 1.5 months, and there is no news at all. There was a major revision before, but he still rejected the manuscript.

阿贾 2022-07-31

Thank you very much for checking the status, which is in peer review and has been submitted for review. Thank you very much.

催化小白 2022-07-27

After submission to ACS, the status remains "under review" until the results are published. To view the actual status, please enter the ACS Publishing Center.

妈的智障转圈圈 2022-07-26

July 18th distribution editor Susannah L. Scott, there has been no progress so far. It should be that it has not been submitted for review.

bing 2022-07-25

Excuse me, has the paper been submitted for review? Has there been any changes in the status? When I submitted it, it only showed "submitted to editorial office," and the current status is "under review." It has been two weeks and it has been in this status consistently. I'm not sure if it has been sent for review or not.

阿贾 2022-07-18

Translation: The submission was made on July 6th, and on July 7th, it showed "Submitted to Editorial Office". It remained in the "Under Review" status until July 18th. Can you confirm if it has been sent for review?

妈的智障转圈圈 2022-07-17

Just submitted an article, and the status is immediately Under Review. I don't know why.

YX-ZJU 2022-06-29

I also delivered it to this editor. May I ask how long it will take for the review?

浅淡于心 2022-06-25

After the major revision, the chief editor added a reviewer. There were two minor revisions in the response. After the third revision on 06-22, it was accepted two days later, hahaha.

摘星不得 2022-06-09

2022.03.11, submission
2022.05.13, received revision comments, major revisions, three reviewers
2022.05.20, sent back revised manuscript to reviewers
No news received until now.

浅淡于心 2022-06-07

Is there any news about the curious renovation?

浅淡于心 2022-06-06

A major repair and a minor repair have returned but there are no results yet, feeling anxious...

BCN没完了 2022-05-20

It has been 20 days since my major repairs, but there is still no news. It's so slow now.

Klose 2022-04-25

If there are prominent innovations in the mechanism and some novel in-situ characterization, you can give it a try. In our field, CEJ has 8 reviewers. One of them has previously reviewed an article for CEJ, and the editor also assigned it to 8 reviewers. After the article was rejected, it was published in JPCL, and it was also well received.

Lee 2022-04-25

"Oh my god, the way you said it, bro, I'm a bit panicked. I have been posting several CEJ articles before and I'm getting a bit tired of it. That's why I wanted to try ACS cata. I always believed that ACS cata and ACB were at the same level. Your words got me worried."

Klose 2022-04-24

Yes, now the chemistry field is dominated by top-tier journals such as ACS Catalysis, Nature Catalysis, Chem, and many other new and domestic journals. If the impact factor of ACS Catalysis continues to hover around 13, it is highly likely to follow in the footsteps of Journal of Catalysis.

Klose 2022-04-24

I have successively submitted to Applied Catalysis B, Chemical Engineering Journal, and Journal of Energy Chemistry, but unfortunately, they were all rejected. Currently, JC is in the second quartile. Finally, with the encouragement of my former mentor, I tried to submit to ACS CATA and after one major revision and two minor revisions, it was accepted.

calm1111 2022-04-21

Is it normal for ACS journals to be this slow? I've been editing for ten days now.

西南雄鹰 2022-04-17

Suddenly realized that there are already 18 associate editors, and it is still expanding continuously. There is a possibility that it may follow in the footsteps of the Journal of Catalysis.

西南雄鹰 2022-04-17

Since changing the editor-in-chief, the quality of articles in this magazine has noticeably declined while the quantity of articles has continued to increase. My article was rejected by ACB, but they surprisingly accepted it after some modifications! I didn't expect that. I am not optimistic about the future development of this magazine. I hope that the impact factor and ranking will not decrease when I graduate. I can't predict whether the Chinese Academy of Sciences will downgrade this magazine to the second zone.

shawfang 2022-04-14

The system status did not change to peer review, so the review comments were returned directly. The reviewer raised many questions, and after making the changes, let's try again. The chances of success are estimated to be low. The main issue is data supplementation. Are there really so many reviewers now? It's really difficult.

bigjar 2022-04-13

Did you come back to review the comments without seeing the peer review?

吃点小海鲜 2022-04-13

If you think there is a problem with the reviewer's response, you can appeal it. I appealed and the editor gave it a second chance, and it was finally accepted.

shawfang 2022-04-12

2022.4.11 Reject suggestion and submit to ACS AEM
There were 5 reviewers, 1 minor revision, 2 major revisions, and 2 suggestions to submit to ACS AMI and RSC Adv. It is indeed difficult to aspire to such a journal.

吃点小海鲜 2022-04-08

2022 2.18 submitted
2022 2.19 associated editor assigned
2022 2.25 in peer review
2022 3.14 major revision
2022 3.31 submitted
2022 4.4 minor revision
2022 4.4 submitted
2022 4.7 accepted

Translated:

2022 2.18 submitted
2022 2.19 associated editor assigned
2022 2.25 in peer review
2022 3.14 major revision
2022 3.31 submitted
2022 4.4 minor revision
2022 4.4 submitted
2022 4.7 accepted

shawfang 2022-04-04

2022.3.23 Submitted
2022.3.23 Associate Editor Assigned: Prof. Paolo Fornasiero
Up until now, it still hasn't been reviewed, very confused!!!

Gormi 2022-04-03

Sending for review will not receive an email, the status will change to "in peer review."

方潇 2022-04-01

Could you please confirm if an email will be received for the submission review meeting? Will the system update the status?