咕噜噜 2023-02-16

2023.1.6 submission
1.7 under review
2.16 Two major revisions and one minor revision, but the editor rejected the submission, saying there were too many submissions and they needed to consider reader interest.
Perhaps my work was not meticulous and thorough enough. It's a great journal, but I'm disappointed!
I will make revisions according to the suggestions. Wishing ACS Catalysis all the best and good luck to everyone!

karl 2023-02-08

Recently, the review process has indeed been a bit slower, but it is definitely not a trash journal as some people claim. Both the manuscripts I reviewed myself and the advice given by the reviewers were relatively professional and impartial. Many people around me have had their papers rejected by JACS and Angew and had to transfer them elsewhere, but ACS journals are still very reliable. The reputation is also better than ACB (a unanimous conclusion of both domestic and international supervisors), although ACB does have a higher impact factor. For this submission, I dared to submit it because it had some new elements, even though the process was slower, fortunately, the outcome was good. PS: Professor Linic seems to be very busy lately, probably because he has to handle many manuscripts. Our group used to have a faster review process.

我爱国刊 2023-01-29

This is the most trashy magazine I have ever seen. It took three months to review, and there were only two review comments, one positive and one negative. As a result, it was directly rejected by Prof. Suljo Linic!! In one word, it's a fighter jet in the garbage!! I hope domestic journals quickly turn this trash into the king of garbage.

CNS 2023-01-26

Translate the following text into English: "20230126 immediate IF 11.9605, IF in June should not be lower than 2021."

CNS 2023-01-26

In the middle of 2020, I published an article at an average pace. Recently, some of the articles I submitted for review were rejected or not reviewed at all. However, I still have a positive impression of the editors as they provide convincing reasons for rejecting my submissions.

dataiyang 2023-01-19

How is the journal Chem Catalysis?

778899catalysis 2023-01-05

Just calculated it, the current impact factor is only 11.43. It is estimated that it will be difficult to reach last year's impact factor of 13.70 next year. It's starting to rise and then fall again. Buy when it rises, don't buy when it falls!

778899catalysis 2023-01-05

The quality of the articles is uneven, and some articles lack sufficient evidence for their mechanisms. It is expected that their influence will decline year by year, coupled with the impact of national journals. The future of this magazine is very bleak. It is recommended that everyone refrain from submitting their good articles to this magazine! After all, this magazine is just like this.

Steven96230 2022-12-20

Just wait patiently. I waited for 21 days before submitting for review, but the review process was surprisingly fast.

大砻坊人 2022-12-19

It has been 5 days in the hands of the Associate Editor, still waiting patiently.

没伞的孩子 2022-12-09

Posted on 8.25, it seems like it was sent for review in just a few days.
The major revisions were given on 10.15, and the deadline to revise them was 11.11. Due to reasons such as the pandemic, the submission was delayed until 11.23.
Then came the agonizing wait. Usually, they say there will be feedback in 1-2 weeks, but I waited for a long time and never received a reply. I was afraid of rejection, but luckily on 12.8, I received the acceptance notification, and finally, my heart was at ease.
I feel like this journal leans towards organic synthesis and such. The research in this article focuses on the interface adsorption and degradation of catalysts, and it doesn't have very impressive characterization. As long as the mechanism is thorough and the evidence is sufficient, there is still a possibility of being considered. Of course, the language and luck in writing are also important. This is just my personal feeling, and I hope everyone has good results.

牛肉汤不要辣 2022-11-29

Posted on August 29th, it finally took three months to complete, with two revisions.

cc 2022-11-28

After I submitted on the 6th, the editor has not assigned any tasks and there has been no news so far.

Steven96230 2022-11-25

The distribution of the associate editors on Double 11 submission day until now, half a month later, still has no news. Is the initial review that slow?

cc 2022-11-21

OP, did you submit it for review?

cc 2022-11-21

Has anyone encountered this situation before?

cc 2022-11-21

Your manuscript has been in this status for nearly 20 days, indicating that it has not been sent for review yet.

cc 2022-11-21

Your manuscript has been in this status since submission, and it has been almost 20 days. Does this mean it has not been sent for review yet?

少年与梦- 2022-11-11

Professor Linic is not in your field of expertise. The manuscript will be returned to the editor-in-chief for reassignment to an associate editor.

科研党美眉 2022-11-11

Original: 楼主，文章后来送审没？
Translation: OP, did you eventually submit the article for review?

科研党美眉 2022-11-09

May I ask everyone who submitted a manuscript on November 7, 2022, when the editor Suljo Linic was assigned on the same day, the ACS Publishing Center system shows the message "Your manuscript has been assigned to an Associate Editor (Dr. Cathleen Crudden) for further evaluation." What does this mean?

化学人 2022-10-25

Number 18 arrives in the hands of China's editors. According to this speed, come back to review the comments after school holidays.

化学人 2022-10-25

Did the OP win? I found that now there are indeed many Chinese editors to choose from for journals.

化学人 2022-10-25

It feels so frustrating. I submitted it on the 17th, and it is still in the hands of the assistant editor.

HAHA哈哈哈 2022-10-25

Submission 2022 10 04
The next day, the secretary sent a message saying that the form order was wrong, but in fact, there was no mistake. He just didn't look carefully. I replied to him and assigned the editing on the same day to Beattriz Roldan Cuenya. She truly lives up to her reputation, but surprisingly slow!
Rejected and not sent for review on 2022 10 25, the reason being that the experiment is innovative enough, but the theory is not innovative enough.
This article was rejected by Angew after a year of revision, and I decided to submit it to ACS catalysts thinking that it would be downgraded.

爬格子ing 2022-10-05

I am in the same situation as you. May I ask, how long did it take for the author to come up with the final result, and was the result good or bad?

诗剑逍遥 2022-09-25

Original text: 楼主，你列的状态过程，有误吧。感觉ACS Catal. 并没有你列的个别状态啊。

Translation: OP, there seems to be some mistake in the process you mentioned. I don't think ACS Catal. includes the specific states you listed.

梦想123 2022-09-08

It has been two weeks since the revision, no news, feeling anxious.

一叶知秋 2022-09-07

Submitted at the end of July, reviewed the next day, it took about two weeks to receive feedback. It took three weeks to respond to the feedback. It has been 10 days since the feedback was returned and there is still no news. Currently waiting.

biomass 2022-09-01

2022.6.20 submitted
2022.6.20 associated editor assigned
2022.6.22 in peer review
2022.7.14 major revision
2022.8.10 submitted
2022.8.25 minor revision
2022.8.26 submitted
2022.8.31 accepted

The editing efficiency is very high, and the reviewers are also very rigorous and responsible. I wish ACS Catalysis continued success and smooth submission for everyone.