认证评论 - Vacuum
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

贝雷 2022-10-14

2022.8.13 Submit
2022.10.6 Major revision
2022.10.12 Return
2022.10.13 Accept

maidangdang 2022-09-15

Hello, I would like to ask for help with Professor H's review issue. qq1622237717. Thank you, thank you.

chuanboy 2022-08-09

After dragging on for three months, finally rejected.

paper猪 2022-08-04

2022.06.26 submitted
2022.06.28 under review
2022.07.17 major revision
2022.07.22 revised
2022.08.03 major revision
2022.08.03 revised
2022.08.04 accepted
One reviewer and one editor for the first review, three reviewers for the second review. The process was fast. Thanks to Professor H.

WCGWD 2022-07-26

It's an old journal, and its impact factor has been continuously increasing in the past two years. It is classified as a second-tier journal by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and offers a relatively high cost-effectiveness. The editorial team of this journal is very efficient, and the submission process went relatively smoothly. It took two months in total, with one editor and one reviewer. We encountered similar problems as everyone else, especially for material researchers. It is highly recommended to carefully analyze XPS data, as the probability of acceptance is higher. Below are the various time points during the submission process for your reference:

2022.05.26: Submitted
2022.05.26: Under review by the editor
2022.05.27: Major review
2022.06.15: Revised, under review by the editor
2022.06.20: Minor revision
2022.06.26: Revised, the editor requested re-correction of XPS data
2022.07.10: Revised
2022.07.13: Under review by the editor
2022.07.17: The reviewer raised 3 questions regarding the XPS and UPS experiments, and the editor requested major revisions
2022.07.22: Revised, under review by the editor
2022.07.25: Revised, accepted

kaka问心 2022-07-12

Already submitted, looking forward to the results.

学习写论文的小白虫 2022-07-05

Accept is an established journal. The opinions provided by the three reviewers are all very professional, and the review process is quite fast, taking approximately three weeks.

iu 2022-06-19

Submit on the second day for review, receive feedback on the revised manuscript in 21 days, and get accepted directly after 10 days of modifications. The entire process takes less than two and a half months. The review speed is very fast, and the reviewers' feedback is indeed quite professional. Luckily, there were no strange reviewers encountered, which is quite fortunate.

科研老王 2022-05-28

2022-0122 Submission
2022-0402 Acceptance
The review process is quite fast, but the editing process is a bit slow once the revised version is returned. The study is about vacuum magnetron sputtering coating, and overall it feels like a quite authoritative journal. Best wishes for continuous improvement in the journal's ranking and impact factor!

投文章难 2022-05-26

2022.03.07 Submitted
2022.03.08 Edited and returned with Major Revision
2022.04.09 Returned after modifications and sent for review
2022.04.11 Major Revision
2022.05.07 Returned
2022.05.11 Major Revision
2022.05.21 Accept
During the process, some representations were added, and one reviewer added comments. There were not many issues with the reviewer, all related to XPS. The editor's comments were slightly more difficult to explain, but they were successfully resolved in the end. I learned a lot during this process, thanks to Professor H. Highly recommended!

fahsudf 2022-05-22

After three major repairs, it will be received and returned on time within 21 days each time.

YYDS Yujie Liu 2022-05-21

Five reviewers, four months, three major revisions and one minor revision, it was finally accepted.

鱼丸粗面 2022-05-06

I filed it a few days after you, and until now there has been no news of the first trial.

Harland 2022-05-01

4.29 acceptance, too fast, amazing magazine!

Harland 2022-05-01

3.26 Submission
4.22 Major revision
4.28 Revised version

Extremely efficient, there is no journal faster than this. The entire process took only a month. I am extremely grateful to Professor H for this amazing journal. How can one not love it?

nanacs 2022-04-23

Hahahaha, one of the reviewers is a senior from our research group, and both reviewers are pretty good. They didn't raise any issues.

鱼丸粗面 2022-04-13

May I ask how long it takes for you to receive news after the first review?

chuanboy 2022-04-12

Encountered a rubbish reviewer.

鱼丸粗面 2022-04-12

How long will it take to receive news after submission?

oooooooooo 2022-03-29

Hello, I would like to consult with you about some questions regarding XPS. May I add you on q2810214463?

YYDS Yujie Liu 2022-03-29

If you consider the first review as editing, there were five reviewers who mostly raised XPS-related issues. The editor requested major revisions. The second review has been under review for half a month.

科研打工人 2022-03-17

How to crack XPS? Family members, urgently seeking help: qq1573357627.

科研打工人 2022-03-17

I am in the process of returning for repair and encountered Professor Hultman, who repeatedly raised a question. I don't know how to modify it. Can we communicate? QQ: 1573357627.

nexus1997 2022-02-24

2021.8.19 received
2021.10.18 revised, accepted on the same day
There was a delay of half a month due to personal reasons in between, which should have been faster.

胡桃Daddy 2022-01-21

Posted on August 29, 2021, reviewed by the editor two days later, and then entered under review.
October 4, 2021 - Major revision (2 major revisions, 1 minor revision, plus minor revisions suggested by the editor), supplemented with experiments and data.
November 13, 2021 - Revision requested.
December 17, 2021 - Major revision (2 accepted, 1 major revision), supplemented with data.
January 13, 2022 - Revision requested.
January 19, 2022 - Minor revision, returned the same day.
January 20, 2022 - Accepted.
The editorial process was relatively fast; however, due to my limited abilities and insufficient data, it took a lot of time to supplement the data. Overall, the editorial department is very professional, and the journal is worth submitting to.

nanacs 2022-01-17

Hello, can I ask about the XPS calibration problem for the Vacuum journal?

nanacs 2022-01-14

Hello, can I add you as a friend? I want to ask you about XPS.

通通饿昏了 2021-12-24

Can I trouble you to ask if there is any news about your second review? I heard that recently, due to Christmas, the editors and reviewers are not working, so it might be a bit slower.

GG233 2021-12-22

11.14投 - Submitted on 11.14
11.17外审 - External audit on 11.17
12.15返修 - Returned for repair on 12.15
12.22 接受 - Accepted on 12.22
感受:超级快 - Feeling: super fast

imr.0716 2021-12-14

Has the OP received any news about the second trial?

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now