认证评论 - Tribology International
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

jinx的微笑 2021-04-11

Your blackness is so fake, you don't even have the basic qualities of a troll.

明傲 2021-04-02

January 15th was the first submission, Michel FILLON rejected it, saying it failed the plagiarism check.
On January 19th, it was resubmitted and reviewed on the 20th, thanks to Michel FILLON's quick response.
Around February 20th, minor revisions were received. The revised manuscript was submitted on March 5th and reviewed on March 7th.
It was accepted on March 30th.
Two articles were published in Tribology International. Wishing the journal continued success.

东海 2021-02-25

Three reviewers, one of them had a very negative opinion. Although it was rejected, I still appreciate the opportunity to submit to this journal. After all, if you want to submit to Friction, you don't even have the chance to review it.
Currently, Friction is very popular, but unfortunately, it doesn't have much to do with ordinary people like us.
This journal is the second best friction journal that ordinary people can submit to.

zhuozipl 2021-02-18

Submission: 2020/12/01
Review: 2020/12/09
Revision comments, a minor revision + a major revision totaling 22 issues, added two experiments, the reviewer was very professional: 2021/1/14
Revised response: 2021/2/08
Acceptance: 2021/2/16

YuanChangYuan 2021-01-28

The top 5 mechanical engineering colleges in the eastern region, which are part of the 985 Project, are implementing a new policy. They no longer recognize the classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and only consider the Excellent Journal Program, the Mechanical Engineering Society, and their own list. The mentors of this journal are not allowing submissions anymore. This could be considered good news for the general 211 and non-Double First Class universities, as it increases their chances of acceptance.

meng 2021-01-21

Aug 25, 2020, submit
Oct 15, 2020, major revision
Nov 16, 2020, revision submitted
Nov 23, 2020, accepted
Nov 27, 2020, available online

The preparation for this submission took a long time, almost a year. However, the submission process went smoothly.
After sending it out, I received reviewer comments in about a month, which required major revisions.
The reviewers were also very professional, and their questions were all related to the paper and very fair.
After spending nearly a month making revisions, it was accepted without further changes.
This is the first paper I have written during my doctoral period, and I hope for smooth sailing in the future.
Best wishes.

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started