alilili 2021-09-02

July 26th - Submitted, quickly with editor
July 29th - Under review
August 3rd - Submitted to journal
August 11th - Required reviews completed
August 25th - Revised, same day with editor
September 1st - Under review

There were two minor revisions and one major revision in the review comments, totaling 25 comments. The person who requested the major revision understood my research direction well and asked for additional Raman data. I couldn't collect the data during the vacation, so I explained my situation as best as I could. I'm unsure if they will ask for further revisions. I'm quite anxious. Is there a high chance of this journal allowing revisions?

元气森林 2021-08-25

Garbage journal, it took them two months to review, and in the end, there was only one reviewer who rejected the manuscript claiming it didn't meet the journal's standards. They should have rejected it earlier instead of dragging it out for over two months. Be cautious when submitting.

浅笑心柔 2021-08-24

2021-06-29 submitted to journal
2021-06-30 with editor
2021-07-01 under review
2021-07-08 required reviews completed
2021-07-12 major revision
2021-08-09 revision submitted to journal
2021-08-09 with editor
2021-08-19 accept
There were a total of four reviewers, and they all provided very professional questions, giving a month for revisions. Thanks to the editor and the reviewers.

dongdongqiang 2021-08-23

20210603 Submission
20210607 Assigned editor FATIMA MONTEMOR, Prof.
20210614 Email notification sent to four reviewers for review
20210619 Email notification sent for required reviews completed
20210709 Email received with feedback, made modifications, total of three reviewers
(Delayed for personal reasons for one month)
20210808 Submitted revised manuscript
20210814 Sent for review again
20210821 Accepted

一棵小草 2021-08-21

7.28 Submission
7.31 Assigned Editor-in-Chief
8.2 Under Review
8.14 Received comments, one reviewer, four questions, minor revisions
8.20 Revisions
8.21 Acceptance
This is the fastest record of acceptance among published articles, less than a month. Thanks to Prof. Weixin Huang, the Editor-in-Chief, for the incredibly fast speed.

myprayer 2021-08-20

Waited for nine days, finally submitted for review, looking forward to good results.

moling 2021-08-19

Normally, this process is quite slow. It has already been three months for me up until now.

moling 2021-08-19

I resisted the urge to rush the manuscript. It was submitted for review one and a half months later. The review process was quick, with minor revisions. Now it has entered the "with editor" status again.

moling 2021-08-19

After I submitted my article, it took a month and a half with the editor. The review process took half a month with two reviewers. One accepted it directly, while the other requested minor revisions. Now it has entered the "with editor" status again. I hope the editor can finish it soon.

DianHei 2021-08-18

Has the situation changed? Mine has been like this for many days too.

元气森林 2021-08-17

Submitted on June 13th, under review since July 12th. The review status changed once during this period. It's too slow, causing anxious waiting.

Elec_tang 2021-08-15

I'm the same, it's been a week and it's still submitted to the journal.

myprayer 2021-08-15

It has been five days, and I feel that time has been passing by slowly recently.

O0o 2021-08-11

Has there been any new progress on the main post?

O0o 2021-08-11

Has the original poster made any new progress with the article now?

lilililili_ 2021-07-26

It has been two weeks, anxious with the editor.

AAsad 2021-07-26

Received at Editorial Office
6 May 2021
Article revised
7 Jul 2021
Article accepted for publication
25 Jul 2021

Less than a month for the review process, with three reviewers. Two reviewers agreed but suggested significant revisions, while the other reviewer recommended rejection and raised three questions. Following the reviewers' suggestions, the paper was carefully revised, and the questions raised by the reviewer who recommended rejection were also addressed. The paper was submitted after the revisions and went under review the same day. After 16 days, the required review was completed, and within 2 days, it was accepted. The entire process, from submission to acceptance, took around 80 days, which is relatively efficient, although slower compared to the previous article, which took less than a month from submission to acceptance.

科研小白一个 2021-07-26

I feel that the review process is quite slow. It has been almost 2 months since submission, and the review has been going on for over a month without any news.

唯青 2021-07-22

Did it not go through Under Review?

wxinseu 2021-07-22

5.01 with editor - This means that the document or work is currently being reviewed by an editor.
5.25 Required reviews completed - All necessary reviews have been finished.
6.03 Major revise - A significant revision of the document or work is needed.
7.01 Revision submitted - The revised version has been submitted.
7.18 Accepted - The revision has been approved or accepted.

victory乔治 2021-07-20

It has been two months since I haven't received any news, and "under review" has changed twice.

王杰 2021-07-17

My article has also been under review for a month without any results. May I ask how do you know the real-time status of an article, such as the number of reviewers and when their comments will be returned to the editor?

科研小白一个 2021-07-17

I have been waiting for my review for a month without any result. Just wait patiently, there will always be a result.

科研小白一个 2021-07-17

My submission has been pending for a month without any results. I'll wait patiently.

imr.0716 2021-07-16

6.16 submitted, quickly under review, five reviewers agreed to review
7.5 required reviews completed
7.16 status updated. Still required reviews completed
Anxiety. It has been 11 days, and the editor hasn't made a decision yet.

imr.0716 2021-07-16

The text translates to: "There have been two changes in between, and the status of 'Required Reviews Completed' has been for 11 days now."

元气森林 2021-07-16

I am too, changed twice, the outcome is now unknown.

zhuozipl 2021-07-14

When I submitted my work, it took more than five minutes. After a year, I completely couldn't reach the same level anymore. Both of my submissions were rejected. The me from back then even said it was easy to get accepted, which was a total embarrassment. I am the fool myself. However, the rejections were very quick.

科研小白一个 2021-07-13

Dear experts who have submitted articles, could you please share your submission process so that the newcomers can learn from it? Thank you.

藤沝 2021-07-09

2021.5.26 Submission
2021.6.21 Major Revision
2021.7.7 Revised
20121.7.9 Accepted
Editor FATIMA MONTEMOR processes manuscripts quickly!