认证评论 - APPLIED PHYSICS A-MATERIALS SCIENCE & PROCESSING
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

zczhao 2022-03-19

Excuse me, how much did you pay for the layout fee?

朝花夕拾123 2022-02-28

Too slow. I invested since October last year and it was fixed once in March this year, but it hasn't had much impact yet.

朝花夕拾123 2022-01-23

Hello? May I ask if the major revision requires changes to the entire text?

豆豆反射弧 2022-01-20

投: submit
大修: major revision
修回: revise and resubmit
接收: accept
online: online
sci检索: indexed in SCI (Science Citation Index)
非常好: very good

Translation: Submitted on October 30, 2021, major revision on November 24, revised and resubmitted on December 15, accepted on December 17, online on January 3, 2022, and simultaneously indexed in SCI. Very good!

论文小写手 2021-10-04

What happened after the major revision was made with the editor for four days?

s110 2021-08-27

Four reviewers, one of them accepted directly, 2 major revisions, 1 strange reviewer didn't provide any comments and rejected the paper in a vague manner, what an idiot. After revising, the one who provided many comments agreed to accept, one still needed minor revisions, and the strange expert who rejected the paper didn't provide any comments and rejected it completely. Finally, the editor rejected it. It's unbelievable that a journal from the fourth district would have such a reviewer who doesn't even understand nanomaterials and blindly rejects papers...

Fall 2021-08-08

It really happened quickly. I also went back for major repairs and accepted it the next day.

Fall 2021-08-08

Too fast, submitted on July 5th, sent for review on July 15th, major revision on July 23rd, returned on the evening of August 7th, and received on the morning of August 8th, the next day... I hope the magazine will continue to improve, the impact factor is now 2.5.

SmallN 2021-07-14

It took two months to submit the manuscript for major revisions. Two reviewers raised more than twenty questions and requested additional testing. Therefore, I applied to the editor for an extension of one month to submit the revised manuscript.

The questions raised were relatively simple but required strong expertise. The testing was required to be very thorough, even evaluating the errors of the testing equipment. The revised manuscript ended up being over 30 pages long, almost as long as a small research paper.

On the second day after resubmission, the editor accepted it without sending it back for further review. I suppose they must have appreciated the thoroughness of the revisions.

Fang Zhou 2021-04-27

20.5.8投 (20.5.8投) - Submitted on May 8th
20.7.11,外审意见,拒 (20.7.11, wàishěn yìjiàn, jù) - On July 11th, external review comments, rejection
理由是研究水平欠佳 (lǐyóu shì yánjiū shuǐpíng qiànjiā) - The reason is inadequate research level

Fang Zhou 2021-04-27

Translation:

20.8.1投 - Submitted on August 1st.
20.8.5编辑拒 - Rejected by the editor on August 5th.
理由是研究内容与期刊不吻合 - The reason is that the research content does not match the journal.

Fall 2021-03-21

Very fast speed, invested in mid-November 2020, major renovation by the end of December, acceptance in January 2021, and publication in February.

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now