bravery_Z 2022-09-28

Hello, may I ask if you use Word or LaTeX for typesetting? Do you have any Word templates?

fuzhiqiang 2022-09-09

Receive notice of major repairs in about 35 days, and receive job offer on the same day after returning for repairs.

苹果胡 2022-09-03

I have submitted my manuscript for three months. May I ask how long it usually takes to receive the review result?

littlevideo 2022-08-30

Is there anyone who has submitted a letter? How is the requirement for innovation?

fuzhiqiang 2022-08-19

The reviewing speed is very fast, the reviewing process is rigorous, and the manuscript is quickly accepted after major revisions. Thumbs up for the editors and reviewers.

不稳定选手36 2022-08-18

2022-4-10 Submission
2022-6-24 First round of review completed (major revision), three reviewers, all seem to be junior colleagues, very professional issues
2022-7-8 Revision requested
2022-7-26 Second round of review completed (minor revision), one comment, requesting to add an experiment
2022-8-2 Revision requested
2022-8-18 Accepted

铠黄 2022-08-12

Yesterday, just submitted work has already exceeded 1300.

littlevideo 2022-08-11

May I ask how many reviewers are there in total?

冯老师炸了 2022-08-10

3.25投 - Submitted on March 25th
5.13回稿 - Feedback received on May 13th
5.21修回 - Revised on May 21st
7.26录用 - Accepted on July 26th

he liming 2022-06-24

2022-05-02 Submission
2022-05-31 Notice of major revision
2022-06-03 Return after major revision
2022-06-24 Acceptance
I submitted using Latex and chose to publish without page charges. The entire process, from submission to acceptance, took less than 2 months.

冯老师炸了 2022-05-11

I am also currently one.

不稳定选手36 2022-05-11

How many reviewers did you assign? I can see that only one reviewer has accepted the review request.

冯老师炸了 2022-05-10

The manuscript has been delivered to the reviewers on the 5th of June, hoping for a smooth process.

he liming 2022-05-05

2022-05-02 Submission

NickXia 2022-03-01

Finally hired after major renovation on 2/21/2022. The opinions of the two reviewers were also quite mild. Looking at others, it seems that the speed varies from person to person. Personally, I feel quite fast.

PNTlab 2022-01-20

Submitted for 13 months, but already graduated and finally rejected for not meeting the journal's theme. Can't believe it.

NickXia 2021-12-20

2021/11/25 submitted
2021/12/03 under review
2021/12/05 under review
2021/12/19 under review

I hope for a good outcome..

good1 2021-12-10

I have been waiting for four months now. If there are still no results, I am prepared to withdraw the submission.

Maradar 2021-12-10

10.21--submitted to journal
10.22--with editor
10.26--with editor
11.02--under review
11.04--under review
11.14--required reviews completed
11.21--required reviews completed
12.07--completed - Reject

Overall, there is indeed a lack of innovation in the work, as noted by three reviewers who are familiar with the research content.

Maradar 2021-12-06

The status of "required reviews completed" has been for over a month. It would be better to reject it earlier and have it returned for modification!

大饼夹一切 2021-12-06

I am almost four months old, and still no news. What should I do?

good1 2021-11-27

It has been over three months since the manuscript was submitted for review, but there is still no detailed feedback. I can't even find the email address to inquire about it, so there is no way to push for the review. I also can't withdraw the submission. This journal is really frustrating. Be cautious when considering submitting to this journal.

good1 2021-11-27

Excuse me, have you obtained an email? Mine has been under review for over three months, and I also want to urge them, but I don't have an email.

Jukebox 2021-11-15

Hello, does this journal value innovation?

山神 2021-09-13

6.1 Submission
7.1 Major revision
8.30 Resubmission
9.7 Acceptance
9.9 Online

In the field of non-destructive testing, the revision process delayed me for a month, but the review was still very fast. There were three reviewers.

zephyrcui 2021-08-22

2021.2.5 submitted to journal
2021.2.16 under review
2021.3.25 under review
2021.5.24 under review
2021.6.10 under review
2021.6.15 Required Reviews Completed
2021.6.16 Revise
2021.7.15 with editor
2021.7.17 under review
2021.08.10 Required Reviews Completed
2021.08.11 Completed - Accept

Translated:

2021.2.5 submitted to journal
2021.2.16 under review
2021.3.25 under review
2021.5.24 under review
2021.6.10 under review
2021.6.15 Required Reviews Completed
2021.6.16 Revise
2021.7.15 with editor
2021.7.17 under review
2021.08.10 Required Reviews Completed
2021.08.11 Completed - Accept

zsbsuper 2021-07-23

Received at Editorial Office 31 May 2021
Article revised 16 Jul 2021
Article accepted for publication 21 Jul 2021
Received minor revisions one month later. The reviewers are particularly interested in innovation. As long as the article is well-written, there shouldn't be any major issues. They reviewed it very carefully.

Lico 2021-06-06

Yes, only by seeing whether the upgraded version will return to Zone 2 in December this year.

yellowvase 2021-06-02

The first review was completed in 2 weeks with 3 reviewers. After the revisions, I encountered a difficult reviewer who did not make any modifications according to the suggestions. Personally, I felt it was a bit exaggerated and responded to each issue. The reviewer expressed regret that I did not adopt his suggestions but pointed out some language problems and provided examples. I made modifications according to the language issues he raised. The editor accepted the revisions.

waitingmzp 2021-05-24

Submission Experience:
2021.2.6 - Submitted to journal
2021.3.9 - Major revision (revision time: 1 month)
2021.4.3 - Submitted revised manuscript
2021.4.5 - With editor
2021.4.24 - Accepted