ChaiFF 2021-07-06

After one month of retrial, still floating around in UR.

rain00000 2021-07-06

It has been two weeks since the major repair return, and it is still under review without any change in the date. Is it considered slow?

yunzhongjie 2021-07-03

The latest impact factor of Zonghuan in 2020 has reached 7.96. I wish all your articles can be accepted.

futianbo 2021-07-01

There are indeed some biased opinions from reviewers on the overall situation. My review comments are also very biased. Stay calm and good luck!

Mr. Liu 2021-07-01

6.30 already submitted
7.1 with editor
Hope for a good outcome, fingers crossed!

然然然然冉 2021-07-01

Change of submission status:
2021.03.18: submission
2021.03.18: under review
2021.03.29: under review
2021.04.04: under review
2021.04.15: under review
2021.04.26: under review
2021.05.05: under review
2021.06.01: required reviews completed
2021.06.02: major revision
2021.06.22: submit revision
2021.06.22: under review
2021.06.30: required reviews completed
2021.06.30: accept

My first SCI submission in life, I am very grateful for the tolerance and help of Prof. Sheridan and the two anonymous reviewers. I wish the Zonghuan Journal continued success!

gppt 2021-06-30

How much is the layout fee?

YYgg1028 2021-06-30

After communicating with the editor, the editor has reconsidered the opinions and it is now under review again.

YYgg1028 2021-06-30

Second reviewer's comments:
In fact, only one of the author's own articles is cited, which discusses how to detect certain indicators.
Reviewer #2: Analysis: This section is filled with references to published works, which may leave the reader uncertain about the validity and applicability of the collected information. It is not possible to determine whether the authors have included any innovative aspects, which are crucial for enhancing and innovating the work.

YYgg1028 2021-06-30

Two reviewers were extremely unprofessional and perfunctory, completely misleading the managing editor. Their opinions are as follows:
Reviewer #1: The work has been conducted based on a very outdated literature survey and is not very relevant at this time.

fanxin 2021-06-21

I voted on the 7th, and it's under review on the 9th. Let's encourage each other.

lee0316 2021-06-20

2021.4.21 Submitted
2021.5.14 Major revision
2021.6.3 Revised
2021.6.14 Minor revision
2021.6.17 Revised
2021.6.19 Accepted

芭乐 2021-06-18

Same situation, four reviewers, many opinions, two of them requested language modifications, so I made some revisions on the official website. After the revisions, I waited for a month for minor adjustments, and the next day it was accepted. I hope this can help you.

Sun YX 2021-06-18

Received a notice for major revisions two months later. The editing was done quickly, but the dates for "under review" changed three times throughout the process. There were five reviewers, and I received feedback from four of them. There were a lot of detailed issues pointed out, and they also mentioned that my English writing lacked professionalism and had grammar problems. They recommended proofreading. I'm wondering how everyone else handles this kind of situation. Do I need to get it proofread? This is the first round, and I'm really looking forward to getting accepted as soon as possible...

吟游生物电化学 2021-06-18

Has the return repair been directly employed? I am going for external review now, the status has not changed, the date has changed once, I'm worried.

Youngzhou 2021-06-17

Zone 2 top, now schools generally consider the basic version zoning.

gaodingshixiong 2021-06-16

Hello, how many reviewers are there for you?

大豆乖 2021-06-14

2021.4.18 submitted to journal/with editor/under review
2021.5.10 major revision Three reviewers, opinions vary greatly, some are minor and very detailed.
2021.5.21 revised with editor/ under review
2021.6.6 required review completed/minor revision
2021.6.7 revised with editor
Accepted 2 hours after submission
Thank you to the highly efficient editors (Ewa K and Philip K H) and angel reviewers. This is the first hurdle, let's encourage each other.

科研人-科研魂 2021-06-14

21/04/19 Submission
21/05/16 Major revision, five reviewers provided many comments and acknowledged the research significance of the article. The comments were very fair and included many suggestions on the details.
21/06/01 Revised
21/06/09 Accept
21/06/10 Online
Overall, the speed of the whole process was really fast, and the efficiency of the editors and reviewers was particularly high. The suggestions they provided greatly improved the article! I hope the process continues to improve, and this is also my first time submitting to the journal.

gaodingshixiong 2021-06-11

投 means "to invest" or "to contribute" in English. So the phrase 比你早一天投 can be translated as "invest one day earlier than you."

唉 is an interjection often used to express a sigh or disappointment, and 共勉 means "encourage each other" or "work together."

Putting it all together, the text 比你早一天投，唉，共勉 can be translated as "Invest one day earlier than you, sigh, let's encourage each other."

jackielw 2021-06-11

2021.05.8 Submission
It took about a week to be reviewed.
During the process, the status changed about five or six times, honestly, it made me quite nervous.
Currently, it has been stuck on 2021.6.4 and hasn't changed since. This timeframe is still considered normal, I suppose, but as a graduate, I rely on it to find a job. I just hope it won't be delayed any further. Please speed up the process!

gaodingshixiong 2021-06-10

How are you doing?

gaodingshixiong 2021-06-10

It has been a month since submission, why is there still no news?

深海鳕鱼子 2021-06-09

6.6 transferred to the main loop
6.9 under review
The speed is indeed very fast
Hope to have good results in the future

TiAmh 2021-06-07

This speed is too amazing... Submit and review on the same day?

123chemis 2021-06-07

Agree with the second floor. The large amount of published articles is indeed due to the high number of submissions. As you can see, I submitted my article at the end of February, and the manuscript number has already reached over 4500. This precisely demonstrates the recognition of STOTEN in the field of environment.

123chemis 2021-06-07

The speed of rejections is very fast, which is not suitable for immediate rejection. Recently, I submitted two articles and both were rejected by the editor for reasons of unsuitability. However, looking at the articles I have published in the past, there are actually quite a few. Maybe the difficulty level has increased recently.

无风 2021-06-06

Why is the overall progress so slow now? Wasn't it supposed to be an average of 2.3 weeks? It has been two months already, and there has only been one change in the deadline in early May, and nothing has happened since then... It would be better to receive rejection news earlier.

天火 2021-06-05

Double line spacing, New Time NR, full text with font size 5, charts separated by separators and placed at the end of the article.

多多益善~ 2021-06-05

"I am also. I was rejected for 4 days and they said I am not suitable for this journal. They asked me to submit to Environmental Advance instead."