认证评论 - APPLIED ENERGY
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

星星点灯123 2023-08-01

Hello, may I ask if your re-submission was suggested by the editor in the rejection email for you to make revisions and submit again? Or did the editor directly reject it without inviting a re-submission, and then you made revisions and re-submitted it yourself? Thank you.

笔如刀 2023-08-01

Jul 24, 2023 Submitted
Jul 26, 2023 With Editor
Aug 1, 2023 With Editor, outcome unknown

windturbine 2023-08-01

Can I submit the next journal directly after being rejected? Or do I have to wait for a rejection before submitting to the next journal? Does anyone downstairs know?

windturbine 2023-08-01

Can I submit to another journal directly without going through the review process if my paper was withdrawn before being reviewed? Or do I have to receive a rejection before submitting to another journal?

噜啦啦 2023-08-01

2023-06-01 Submission
2023-06-04 with editor (Zita Vale)
2023-06-14 with editor (Senior Editor H Yang)
2023-06-16 reviewer invited
2023-07-07 under review
2023-07-18 required reviews complete
2023-07-21 required reviews complete
2023-07-23 required reviews complete
2023-07-25 Decision in Process
Waiting for the result, the editor's handling is quite fast, but it took a long time to invite reviewers. According to the system query, a total of 23 reviewers were invited, and the last 3 accepted the review.

刘博论文多多 2023-07-30

Update 7.23 under viewer, a reviewer has accepted the review.

ssss_y 2023-07-30

uu, did you not submit for review after being invited to review? My status has been like this for over a month, and it feels like the handling editor hasn't logged into the system.

刘博论文多多 2023-07-30

I feel that the unsubmitted dip is done for.

刘博论文多多 2023-07-30

Non-communicating authors will only receive an email at the submission stage at present.

RYzz 2023-07-29

How is the brother upstairs doing? I also waited for three weeks, from "with editor" directly to "decision in process". Does it mean that if it's not sent for review, it's not going to work out?

windturbine 2023-07-28

Is the email only sent to the corresponding author? Will non-corresponding authors receive the email?

广隶士口 2023-07-27

Hello, I would like to ask if my first submission is rejected because of DIP? Does the article go through the main editor first, and if they find it acceptable, do they assign it to an assistant editor? Or can the first submission be directly handled by an assistant editor?

刘博论文多多 2023-07-25

The email will notify, several emails, one of which is sent by the editor-in-chief, and later received another email saying that the article will be handled by *** deputy editor.

文静123 2023-07-25

2023.06.06 Submission
2023.07.11 Reviewer invited
2023.07.23 Under Reviewer

windturbine 2023-07-24

How can I check which editor has been assigned to the article? I have always been with an editor on my side.

刘博论文多多 2023-07-22

2023.6.29 Submission
2023.7.1 Format modification
2023.7.1 with editor (Zita Vale)
2023.7.16 with editor (Associate Editor)
2023.7.21 reviewer invited
Good luck, hoping for good news in the future.

xzh_zlf 2023-07-22

7.4 Submission
7.6 with editor until now

Eros2012 2023-07-21

Too slow, submitting for 10 days or with editor.

Shuang 2023-07-20

7.18 Submission
7.19 Revised and submitted with editor regarding the formatting issues from the corresponding author
7.20 with editor
8.1 with Associate Editor
(The journal is taking too long to process)
8.7 Reviewer invited
How can we check how many reviewers have been invited? The corresponding author has not received the tracking email.

hafolada 2023-07-20

On the third day of submission, it turned into "decision in process". It has been over a week in this status, if they want to reject it, they should do it decisively.

srdong 2023-07-19

My situation is the same. I have been waiting for more than twenty days with the editor. On the 18th, it changed to "decision in process", and it's been a long time.

呐呐酱 2023-07-19

Jul 18 Decision in Process.

Translation: The decision made on July 18 is currently being processed.

了-1 2023-07-17

2023.07.17 Con Editor

Devin_AB 2023-07-16

Submitted in early May, the first review comments were sent back in early June, and the feedback was very positive. It was accepted in early July. The second article was handled by the Associate Editor (AE) with the same steady speed. Each reviewer was very professional, making it a good journal. Currently, there are two editors-in-chief, and occasionally the review process may fluctuate, but overall, it is still quite stable.

论人海战 2023-07-14

It has been two months since informing the editor that it has not been submitted for review, which is a bit too trashy.

随喻而安 2023-07-12

Is it possible to vote again if mine is like this too?

随喻而安 2023-07-12

Jul 05, 2023, submission. Jul 07, 2023, in Decision in Process. This journal is so slow, if you're in a hurry, never submit here. They simply reject without any communication, it's obvious they want to reject, but they just want to waste your time.

something_ 2023-07-11

The processing speed edited by a retired professor is really not commendable...

snowypig 2023-07-10

Oh, I forgot. The status also changed during the first review period. It was initially UR, and after about a month, it changed to RRC. Then, within two days, it continued to UR.

snowypig 2023-07-10

The journal is not bad, but the review process may be longer, and the speed of editor handling is average.
Submitted in early April.
Review comments returned in mid-May, with six reviewers, five positive and one not reviewed. Major revisions took 45 days. Each person's comments were fair and not excessive, but there were many reviewers...
Returned in late June for re-review, all five reviewers requested re-review. The status kept changing during this period, UR-RRC-UR-RRC-UR-RRC...
Three weeks later, four out of the five reviewers returned their comments, and the next day the editor accepted the submission.
The whole process from submission to acceptance took three months. Most of the reviewers were quite professional, and their questions were targeted. The editor usually processed them within one week. There was a change in editor during this period.

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started