icepoloz 2022-08-13

Currently, in the published articles, approximately 1/3 are reviews, and the remaining 2/3 are research papers. The review process has become faster in the past two years.

441509 2022-08-11

Delivered on August 8th, not sure when it will be with the editor.

YYDS.. 2022-08-10

Is this journal a review journal? Does it accept articles related to technology?

兰陵笑笑声 2022-08-06

Why has it been almost a week since the submission, but the manuscript has still not been assigned a number?

我要炒股票 2022-07-28

2022.7.22 提交给期刊

Translated: Submitted to journal on July 22, 2022.

icepoloz 2022-07-22

5.9 submission, 6.20 received major revision comments, rejected twice (with minor revisions). The review process for the special issue submission was relatively fast, right?

The reason for rejection was lack of innovation and no other comments, while the other two reviewers had few comments, which were relatively easy to address. One reviewer requested an explanation of the technical application scope, while the other raised a few minor issues regarding modeling software and image modifications.

The editor-in-chief does not seem to be too concerned about the rejection and provided an opportunity for major revisions.

Revised on 7.11, sent for review on 7.19, accepted on 7.21.

Our research group has never submitted to this journal before, and this is also the first time aiming for such a high impact factor.

This is the first paper during my Ph.D., and I plan to write another review article to submit to RSER.

loner2 2022-07-04

Submission Date: June 30th;
With Editor Date: July 3rd.

BAOGEGE 2022-06-24

Classmate, which specific field of civil engineering are you in?

夜幕初下 2022-06-20

The processing speed of this submission feels much faster. Submitted in mid-January, sent for review in mid-February, received initial review in early May (three reviewers, editor requested language polishing), uploaded for review in early June, and accepted in mid-June. The processing speed is much faster compared to previous submissions, and this time it is also a review article.

miemieyang 2022-05-27

9.14 submit
9.20 with editor
10.1 under review
10.14 under review
11.18 under review
12.21 under review
2.21 under review
3.3 under review
3.15 require review completed
3.29 major revision
4.24 submit
4.26 with editor
4.28 under review
5.10 ACCEPT

Translation:
9.14 submit
9.20 with editor
10.1 under review
10.14 under review
11.18 under review
12.21 under review
2.21 under review
3.3 under review
3.15 require review completed
3.29 major revision
4.24 submit
4.26 with editor
4.28 under review
5.10 ACCEPT

zhenghu 2022-05-10

How is it going? Mine has been under review for a week and it has been several days now, feeling anxious!

天涯若比邻 2022-05-04

The submission has not been reviewed, and it has been 10 days since the decision process started. The rejection is also being delayed. What should I do?

科研乐 2022-04-30

Hello, may I ask if this magazine is inviting contributions for review articles?

cmyaz 2022-04-18

Summary of the investment, there are no experts in the group, both the teacher and I are new to this field. The summary must be written with care, read more of the latest articles, and the logical flow of writing is also important.

金典喵 2022-04-08

May I ask if the esteemed predecessors require a team of experts for submitting a review article to your esteemed journal? Is it necessary to be invited in order to submit a review article? I have written a 20-page review article and I am hesitating whether to give it a try. Can the review process take about one month? Seeking guidance as this is my first SCI paper.

不说了 2022-03-24

Around 20 or more days.

我最单纯 2022-02-23

Submitted a review, one month later it was desk rejected!

TENCAT 2022-02-20

Excuse me, senior colleagues who have submitted before, how long does it take for this journal to review and either accept or reject submissions? People say it is very slow and I am a bit worried.

Raffaello 2021-12-17

The actual process of being submitted to a journal and being with an editor, regardless of whether it is the initial submission or a revised manuscript, takes a long time (specific time not recorded).

Raffaello 2021-12-17

The first time I published a paper on RSER, it was a review article related to thermal energy storage.
Submitted on May 4, 2021.
Received reviewer comments on September 25, 2021. It required major revisions, with about ten suggestions from two reviewers, one of whom might have been an editor. The suggestions included modifying the paper's structure, but they were not particularly difficult to implement.
Submitted the revised manuscript on October 7, 2021.
Accepted on December 2, 2021. After submitting the revised manuscript, it went through another round of review, which took nearly a month. However, no further revisions were requested afterwards.

qazws 2021-12-13

Excuse me, but after "with editor", does "decision in process" mean tragedy?

晋西北乌克兰 2021-12-01

The review process is really slow.
2021.05.26 submit
2021.08.04 under review
2021.09.07 major revisions
2021.10.04 submit
2021.11.17 minor revisions
2021.11.25 submit
Now: revision submitted to journal

jkjiangkai1 2021-11-23

2019-2021 One article per year. The first two articles took three months with the editor before entering the review process. This article waited for a little over a month.

The reviewer's suggestions were very pertinent. Personally, I feel that one of the reviewers is an editor. Although they affirmed the research significance of the paper, they raised many challenging questions, especially regarding geopolitical and national competition issues.

July 16, 2021: Submitted
September 12, 2021: Major revision
October 10, 2021: Due for submission, but due to work reasons, I couldn't complete it and applied for a two-week extension.
October 27, 2021: Submitted
November 20, 2021: Accepted

木叶小飞虫 2021-10-08

Submit (2021.05.31);
With Editor (2021.06.01);
Under Review (2021.06.31);
Required Reviews Completed (2021.07.20);
Major Revisions (2021.08.05);
Submit (2021.09.03);
With Editor (2021.09.06);
Under Review (2021.09.07);
Required Reviews Completed (2021.09.18);
Accept (2021.09.23);
Available online (2021.10.01)
A review article, feels quite fast.

马兰花 2021-08-24

Posted for 2 months, still with the editor. RESR used to publish reviews, so the slow speed of the journal doesn't have a big impact on the quality and timeliness of the papers, as review materials can be supplemented at any time. Now RESR has published many research papers, and the slow speed is affecting the practicality of the papers. In addition, for a small paper that has been completed, it is generally not worth spending a lot of time maintaining the work in the paper. A delay of half a year or a year has a significant impact on resubmission and revisions of the paper. It is suggested that the editorial department handle the manuscripts as soon as possible, otherwise it will not be conducive to attracting high-quality research papers.

xrcau 2021-08-07

Another article was submitted on April 1st and rejected by the editor on August 3rd. The aforementioned article focused more on macro-level calculations and was a research piece. The rejected article, on the other hand, was a serious review, which might be comparatively more challenging. This information is provided for reference only.

月ld神 2021-08-06

Dynamic model and applications of supercapacitors
Submitted on September 29, 2020
Received a reference number one week later
Entered the review process after three months
Received the review results on June 5, 2021: Major revisions requested and deadline for resubmission set for July 3
Resubmitted the revised manuscript on June 28 and received the second round of review results on July 19: Major revisions requested and deadline for resubmission set for August 3
Resubmitted the revised manuscript on July 28 and the paper was accepted on August 5, 2021.
A very smooth submission process!

笑嘻嘻xxx 2021-08-04

Reply, this is my second submission to RSER. The first submission was relatively fast, taking about 4 and a half months from submission to acceptance. The second one was more difficult, as it was rejected once and then resubmitted after revisions to RSER. The two submissions combined took almost 20 months, over a year. The speed of the second article was slower, with the editor taking about four months. However, once it entered the under review stage, it was relatively fast and similar to the speed of a normal journal. But now, the review cycle of this journal is indeed very long, mostly over six months, mainly due to the long with editor time.
In addition, if there are format or language issues, the rejection usually occurs during the with editor stage, as this journal shows with editor for both plagiarism check and language editing. However, considering that the impact factor of this journal is already high, almost 15 this year, it's better to tolerate it. Nowadays, even though people say they don't look at the impact factor, papers with high impact factors are still favored when it comes to awards, job applications, and funding applications.

学术白痴 2021-07-26

Submitted at the end of May and sent for Under Review on July 10th.

WD0256 2021-07-22

It is normal for several months with the editor. Last year, it took a full 7 months with the editor before receiving the result after submission. As long as it is submitted for review, it seems to be fast.