Yagamy 2023-06-03

How do you all view the situation of editors inviting reviewers?

特又投 2023-06-03

Excuse me, what could be the reason if the author didn't receive an email after submitting the manuscript?

张一了 2023-06-01

There have been no updates between the submission of r2 and its acceptance for two months.

I_AM_YP 2023-06-01

Invited 5 people, only one accepted and finished reviewing, the others have been silent. It has been almost 3 months since the first review, should I send an email to remind the editor?

袋底洞的木糖醇 2023-05-29

How to track the connection to see if there are any reviewers' comments?

abaflu1 2023-05-26

March 27th, submission
April 15th, received review comments from three reviewers, almost 30 comments were given within 14 days for revision
April 29th, submitted revised manuscript
May 25th, second review, minor revisions (two reviewers), 12 issues.

wttmm 2023-05-25

2022.11.30 submitted - Submitted on November 30, 2022.
2022.12.31 R1 - First round review on December 31, 2022.
2023.1.20 R1 submitted - Submitted for first round review on January 20, 2023.
2023.2.7 R2 - Second round review on February 7, 2023.
2023.2.24 R2 submitted - Submitted for second round review on February 24, 2023.
2023.4.16 Accepted - Accepted on April 16, 2023.

QooC 2023-05-16

April 14th - Submitted
April 19th - Under review
May 14th - Reject

One reviewer said it was okay, but the other reviewer rejected it, stating that the figures and tables were repetitive, and the model was not reasonable.

aidanmomo 2023-05-15

Hello, I would like to ask if all authors need to confirm when submitting a manuscript, or if confirmation is only required after acceptance?

托雅塔 2023-05-13

I don't know if it's because I missed it or for some other reason, but there are no words like major revision, minor revision, or rejection in the editing suggestions!

托雅塔 2023-05-13

2023/03/29 submitted
2023/03/31 with editor
2023/04/03 under review (Invited 4 reviewers, no one accepted)
2023/04/04 under review (Invited 1 more reviewer, no one accepted)
2023/04/14 under review (Invited 5 more reviewers, 1 accepted)
2023/04/17 under review (2 more accepted)
2023/04/28 under review (One reviewer completed)
2023/04/29 required reviewers completed (Two reviewers completed)
2023/05/11 required reviewers completed (Three reviewers completed)
2023/05/13 revise (Three reviewers, 34 comments, given 20 days for revisions, most comments were expected, the third reviewer provided particularly detailed feedback, overall, much more professional compared to previous submissions to open-source SCI journals.)

abaflu1 2023-05-07

March 27th, submission.
April 15th, received review comments from three reviewers. Nearly 30 review comments were given, and 14 days were given to make revisions.
April 29th, submitted revised manuscript, currently awaiting further processing.

undefined 2023-04-30

22.12.31 Submission
23.3.20 Major revision
23.4.30 Acceptance
The editing process is fast, and the reviewers are also quick. The main time is wasted on finding reviewers.

托雅塔 2023-04-25

It is not a submission system, but a email sent to your mailbox.

昨天太近6 2023-04-25

I wrote a total of 53 pages in Word, and the feedback from the reviewer is a total of 28 pages.

zzzzfreee 2023-04-24

Submitted on April 12, 2022;
Major revision in July, three reviewers had minor comments, one had slightly more;
Accepted on April 5, 2023, with online modifications;
Published on April 23.
Overall, the review process took up to a year, and I heard that there are currently many articles in the queue for the journal.

托雅塔 2023-04-24

If it is approved for review, an email will be sent to the corresponding author with a link inside.

hhuzww 2023-04-24

Are you so envious? We submitted our papers at the same time, but yours is still under review, and does it really take so long to make the revisions based on the reviewer's comments? My revisions were simple, just some minor changes in wording and content, didn't take much time.

昨天太近6 2023-04-24

The review time for this is really divided by the content. Sister wrote a minor revision and rejection in the first review, and it has been 7 months since the second review... still no progress.

昨天太近6 2023-04-24

January 28 submission
The first review took more than 20 days for major revisions, while the second review took more than 20 days for minor revisions. After making the revisions, it took six days.
Published on April 18.
Published on April 24.
It was really fast. I made the changes slowly according to the review comments, spending about two weeks (12 hours per day) and staying up all night for two days. Generally speaking, it is not easy for the manuscript to be rejected by the journal "OE," but it is also quite difficult to get accepted.

cx7 2023-04-23

Is it displayed on the submission system? Or is it known through email? I logged in with the corresponding author's account and didn't find this detail...

托雅塔 2023-04-23

The corresponding author has details.

cx7 2023-04-23

My previous article has been reviewed for nearly 5 months, and it has been 7 months since it was accepted for publication.

cx7 2023-04-23

How do you view several reviewers?

托雅塔 2023-04-23

2023/03/29 submitted
2023/03/31 with editor
2023/04/03 under review (Invited 4 reviewers, none accepted)
2023/04/04 under review (Invited 1 more reviewer, none accepted)
2023/04/14 under review (Invited 5 more reviewers, 1 accepted)
2023/04/17 under review (2 more accepted)

hhuzww 2023-04-22

May 21st: The status has been changed to "revise". The same two reviewers are still assigned to me. One reviewer asked me to answer two small questions and make simple revisions. The other one still thinks there are issues with my modeling and it needs to be redone. They have given me 14 days to make the revisions.

June 1st: I sent the revised version back. During this period, I was busy preparing for my master's thesis defense. I added a new model and obtained results that proved my modeling is acceptable. Hopefully, this will help me get through. I am prepared for the possibility of rejection.

June 20th: The feedback has arrived.

June 25th: Request for revision and resubmission.

June 30th: Acceptance! Wow! I am truly touched to have my paper accepted in a SCI journal!

金典喵 2023-04-20

desk reject
The email notification stated that the written content does not fit the journal's requirements.
What I wrote indeed involves the interdisciplinary field of ocean and electronic engineering, as well as the application of underwater vehicles. Moreover, there are also many similar articles in OE. It is regrettable that it has been transferred to an electronic journal.

hhuzww 2023-04-18

January 20th submitted
January 23rd status changed to "with editor"
February 11th status changed to "under review"
March 26th status changed to "revise". Two reviewers were found. One reviewer gave positive feedback and provided detailed suggestions for modifications. The other reviewer believed that there were issues with my wave modeling method and asked me to redo it and convince them, otherwise they would not continue reviewing my article. They provided 5 sharp criticisms about the modeling. The editor gave me 3 weeks to make revisions. I carefully addressed the reviewers' comments, avoided commenting on the negative feedback, and did not redo the modeling. April 14th, returned for revisions.
April 16th, status changed to "with editor". I am unsure of the outcome and have prepared for rejection.
April 22nd, under review.

托雅塔 2023-04-17

And finally, there is a half-month review manuscript opinion.

托雅塔 2023-04-17

Then, at most, one and a half months to review the comments on the manuscript.