slowlyandfirmly 2021-12-11

I never expected that this submission would be processed so quickly.
Submitted on 8.10.
Received major revision on 10.10, with feedback from two reviewers, both of which were quite positive.
Returned revised manuscript on 11.10.
Accepted on 12.10.
The reason for the quick process might be that the paper was quickly assigned to reviewers and went under review on the third day after submission. The journal's processing speed is fast, and the reviewers' feedback was professional. I hope this information is helpful to everyone and I wish you all a smooth submission process.

绝世枭雄 2021-12-02

Hello, may I ask how long after being hired will the proofreading be done?

绝世枭雄 2021-12-02

Hello, may I ask how long it takes for your paper to be accepted after being accepted?

绝世枭雄 2021-11-23

I was also hired in early November, but it has been over 20 days and they haven't contacted me about the manuscript. Is this normal?

清华隔壁王同学 2021-11-19

There were a total of 6 reviewers in the first review, with one acceptance, one minor revision, and 4 major revisions. The revision period was 12 weeks. In the second review, only one reviewer had language issues and helped modify the abstract in their comments. All other suggestions were accepted, and another 12-week revision period was given. Considering that the reviewers may also be editors, they improved the language during this revision. About a week later, an acceptance email was received, and the entire process took about 7 months. Proofreading and copyright agreement were conducted within 2 weeks after acceptance.
Wishing everyone a successful submission!

清华隔壁王同学 2021-11-19

20210407 Submit
20210622 Major
20210904 Submit
20211006 Minor
20211020 Submit
20211101 Accept

李佳琦 2021-11-19

Already submitted, with the editor for more than 10 days.
Feeling more bad than good.

不可思议 2021-11-02

14 Oct 2021 Editor Decision - Accept
21 Sep 2021
21 Sep 2021
21 Sep 2021
06 Sep 2021
23 Jul 2021
23 Jul 2021
23 Jul 2021
23 Jul 2021
23 Jul 2021
06 Jul 2021
05 Feb 2021
05 Feb 2021
05 Feb 2021
04 Feb 2021
04 Feb 2021
Summary: First SCI paper in life, loved it.

科研虾米 2021-10-27

04 Aug 提交 - Submitted on 04 Aug
06 Aug revise before review - Revise before review on 06 Aug
08 Aug 提交 - Submitted on 08 Aug
10 Aug editor assigned - Editor assigned on 10 Aug
19 Aug under review - Under review on 19 Aug
05 Oct Reviews completed - Reviews completed on 05 Oct
8 Oct accept - Accepted on 8 Oct

wearthas 2021-10-12

Recently, for the past week, it has been all about completed reviews, lasting for over a week. The situation is more bad than good... I am in the mechanical field, do you have any suggestions for journals, my friends?

不可思议 2021-10-10

Posted in early February 2021, received comments in early July, returned around July 20th, revised again in early September, returned on September 21st, current status is "Under Review" (UR).
Feeling extremely anxious.

taylor1993 2021-10-07

The second review has been assigned to an editor for three weeks.

RUNMO 2021-09-30

It is estimated that the request for review was sent but the reviewer did not agree to review it. I also submitted my contribution, and the reviewers have been assigned for a long time.

wearthas 2021-09-29

Posted in May 2021, it is now September 2021, and the status has been constantly switching between "under review" and "reviewers assigned". I'm anxiously waiting for any updates...

Jong 2021-07-08

The proofreading information was sent after more than 20 days of acceptance, and the proofreading can be done online to reflect any issues. It is also possible to reply to the proofreading through email. During this period, there will also be a process of signing a publishing agreement, and once the proofreading is completed, it will be published online quickly.

shuhuan 2021-07-04

The number of posts needs to be controlled.

zhouashin 2021-06-26

How long should I proofread the manuscript after receiving the offer letter?

zhouashin 2021-06-26

May I ask how long after receiving the offer email will the proofreading be done?

Jong 2021-06-06

2020.11.29 submission
2021.02.07 major revision
2021.04.20 revision submitted
2021.05.16 minor revision
2021.05.20 revision submitted
2021.06.05 accepted

There were a total of 7 reviewers in the first review, with over 80 comments provided, and a 3-month revision period was given. In the second review, only one reviewer had two explanatory questions and some image formatting issues, while the rest were suggestions for acceptance. Another 3-month revision period was given in the second review. Due to the concern of giving the impression of not taking the revision seriously if the response was too quick, intentionally delayed the submission by one week. Approximately half a month later, an acceptance email was received, taking a total of about 7 months.

The reviewers provided detailed reviews, with industry professionals raising critical questions, which will greatly improve the article after revisions.

Wishing everyone a successful submission!

心昔xiang 2021-06-06

After two revisions, I requested to add a data statement and to include it at the end of the article. Specific data can be provided if needed. The paper has now been accepted.

Lonn 2021-06-03

I submitted twice and got rejected. They said I need a data availability statement and data links. Is this necessary? Even after adding "Data sharing is not applicable to this article" the second time, it still didn't work.

小 Jia 2021-05-30

Always assigned as a reviewer, it has been a month. May I ask what does this status represent?

moon21 2021-05-13

2020-06-16 Submission
2020-08-12 Major Revision
2020-09-23 Revision Submitted
2020-10-19 Accept

The process was fast, the editor was responsible. There were two reviewers, one with positive feedback and the other with over ten questions, indicating that they might not be familiar with the topic. The editor requested major revisions, and after the modifications, the paper was accepted. This journal in the field of dynamics is truly recognized as a top journal.

金刚1111 2021-05-06

Top journal of nonlinear dynamics, with many influential articles. I hope to publish one myself as well.

小 Jia 2021-04-23

Is it normal for an editor to still be assigned after 20 days of submission? I have a feeling that it might be rejected. Why hasn't it been reviewed yet? I'm curious to know how long it usually takes for others to get their submissions reviewed.

阴天别闹了 2021-04-19

The whole process took 5 months, and both the first and second reviews were quite fast. The main delay was due to a major revision coinciding with the Spring Festival. The opinions of the four reviewers were indeed helpful in improving the quality of the article. This journal did have some flaws a long time ago, but since the change of editor-in-chief, the reputation of the magazine has gradually recovered and the requirements for articles have become higher.

小马鲁鲁 2021-04-13

Because I am a reviewer for MMT, objectively speaking, MMT also has good articles. However, it has now been downgraded from Zone 1 to Zone 2 (after all, the impact factor and other objective indicators are not high). But as an author, there is no need to compare ND with MMT. The reason for the downgrade is because the Chinese Academy of Sciences is using a new algorithm, which seems to be called the Journal Citation Reports. It takes into account the level of each article in the journal's field. ND undoubtedly has very good quality articles, but it cannot be ignored that the annual publication volume is over 700, which inevitably leads to some articles lowering the zone of ND. However, luckily, there are top journals in the field of mechanical engineering like TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS. If you are worried about the journal being downgraded, you can try these journals. After all, the downgrade has a significant impact on everyone, especially for those who are not able to advance or leave.

想去深圳 2021-04-10

I would like to ask, after one month of the nd review process, it has been constantly showing "editor assigned" and the editor has not provided the final result. I wanted to ask if you are aware of this situation?

wo 2021-04-09

Fortunately, the eyes of the masses are keen, and for some objective evaluations, the malicious downvotes have not exceeded the number of upvotes.

wo 2021-04-09

Without a doubt, ND is a top journal in the field of mechanics. After reading the comments, objective comments expressing opinions are maliciously disliked, while troll posts are maliciously upvoted. I was wondering what was going on, but it turns out that one can upvote or downvote an unlimited number of times. This is definitely the work of one person. Please, this troll should accumulate some virtue and refrain from baselessly criticizing a good journal. You should first publish an article in ND before saying anything.