李茂娇 2021-06-19

Did you provide three sets of original data for WB?

李茂娇 2021-06-19

May I ask if the WB data you submitted is all the original data repeated three times?

清水023 2021-06-02

04.17 submission, then estimated many manuscripts, continuously in initial assessment for 10 days
04.27 in peer review
05.14 major revision, the review process was quick, 2 reviewers provided minor revisions, one rejected and requested resubmission, a total of 11 issues. Due to significant disagreements among reviewers, the editor requested major revisions.
05.21 R1 submission
05.25 minor revision, the last 2 reviewers accepted the manuscript, while the first reviewer remained focused on two particular issues. However, from the questions asked, it can be seen that their research area belongs to the same general direction, but they are not familiar with the specific subfield.
05.27 R2 submission, actually finished writing it the same evening but procrastinated and submitted it a few days later
06.01 in peer review (surprisingly, the diligent editor even sent it for review again for minor revisions)
06.02 accept

It took exactly 1.5 months. Thanks to Professor Kim from South Korea's Ewha Womans University for being very efficient.

material super 2021-05-21

"Applied template"

leone l 2021-04-30

Finally, I also have the opportunity to share.
Submitted on 2.22.
It took nearly two weeks to reach the editor.
Returned with major revisions on 3.29, with 10 revision suggestions from two reviewers. One reviewer had very professional suggestions with minimal questioning.
Due to an internship, a lot of time was delayed, so it took nearly a month to return the revised manuscript after being reminded twice by the editor.
Returned with revised manuscript on 4.28.
Notification of acceptance on 4.30.
Thanks to editor Quan Li, the efficiency was really high. The first SCI paper was published in Nanoscale, and I hope Nanoscale continues to improve. I also wish everyone success.

超越附体 2021-04-30

May I ask you, do I need to use the template provided on the official website for submitting the manuscript?

超越附体 2021-04-30

I would like to ask you, do I need to use the template provided on the official website to submit the manuscript? Thank you.

xiaozi 2021-04-27

Mine too, it has been 10 days since I submitted, and it is still in the initial review status.

行云流水之科研 2021-04-25

The submission has been over ten days now, and it is still in initial assessment. I wonder how everyone's progress has been lately.

Dr_Still 2021-03-31

May I ask, even after submission, will "with editor" remain unchanged until the review comments are received?

一只工科女 2021-03-30

Excuse me, I would like to ask, I have submitted and it has been in the initial assessment status, but it has not yet reached the "with editor" stage. How long did the initial assessment pause for?

Dr_Still 2021-03-16

Already with the editor, a few days ago I asked for the result, the future is unknown!

Dr_Still 2021-03-16

It has been 12 days since I have been with the editor. I had to submit the wb results a few days ago, and I have already sent them. Do you have any updates? I wonder how the results will turn out.

leeric 2021-03-14

My 7 days with the editor, 10 days later in peer review, maybe there are more manuscripts recently.

moonlight丶 2021-03-14

Hello, may I ask if the editing has been assigned? I have also been waiting for five days and still haven't been assigned to an editor.

Dr_Still 2021-03-03

Posted on February 23rd, currently still with the editorial office. Is there anyone knowledgeable who can analyze what this situation is?

唐古拉 2021-02-17

The visible editorial status in peer review has been ongoing for two months. Brother, any updates? Better me/？

守望者的幻梦 2021-02-05

2020.12.31 Submitted
2021.01.08 In peer review
2021.01.18 Major revision
2021.02.04 Revision submitted
2021.02.05 Accepted

This manuscript was initially submitted to ACS Nano, but after two reviewers requested major revisions, the editor rejected it. Afterwards, it was also submitted to AMI and CEJ, but neither of them sent it for review. Finally, it was submitted to Nanoscale. Many thanks to the editor Quan Li for their efficiency, and the two reviewers for their promptness. The results were obtained in about ten days, and after the major revisions were made, it was accepted in less than a day. The impact factor has been decreasing in recent years, so it is hoped that the journal can operate as well as other materials journals and improve its impact factor.

安乃近 2021-01-29

A non-invited review article
Submitted on 23rd November 2020
With editor on 24th November 2020
In peer review on 30th November 2020
Major revision on 13th January 2021
R1 submitted on 25th January 2021
Accepted on 26th January 2021
The editor is Prof. Xing Yi Ling from Nanyang Technological University, who is very nice and efficient.

Better me 2021-01-11

The text translates to: "Submitted on the 9th, revised on the 16th with the editor, and started peer review again on the 18th. Bio-materials are not electrochemical."

唐古拉 2021-01-10

Better me, buddy, has your middle part become "with editor"? Is it also electrochemistry?

Better me 2021-01-08

My submission on December 1st, I have not received any news since it was sent for review on December 9th. I am anxiously waiting.