xiangqq 2022-04-08

3.4 Submission
3.21 Rejected, given three options for resubmission, chose to resubmit

金隅 2022-03-22

3.17 submission, 3.17 with editor, it has been almost a week and still with editor, hoping for good luck.

xiangqq 2022-03-18

The translation of the given text is: "After two weeks of submission, is it still with the editor? May I ask what's next, OP?"

penguin 2022-02-23

Even though the impact factor has dropped to 23, it is expected to plummet by 8 points next year. The bubble has finally burst. This journal is basically composed of a few individuals who contribute, and the annual publication volume is only 200 articles.

boron2 2022-01-04

The editor is very nice and has high efficiency.

Academic Jason 2021-11-02

Hello, congratulations on being hired! I would like to inquire about the considerations when submitting a review article for publication that is not an invited manuscript. Specifically in the field of metallic materials.

chemilulu 2021-09-16

Same question as the one raised by the previous commenter, will there be any changes in status?

energy storage 2021-09-03

Do I need to write to the editor in advance for a review article? Or can I submit it directly?

Leve 2021-08-06

Hello, classmate. What are the specific statuses of submissions? Is there a status called "in peer review"? I have submitted it for more than ten days, and it has been "with editor" all this time.

Leve 2021-08-05

Hello classmate, what are the specific statuses for submitting articles? I submitted mine more than ten days ago and it has been "with editor" all this time.

huansheng 2021-03-15

A review article. With time at home during the epidemic, I invested a lot of effort into organizing it. The magazine has a high positioning and I really like the layout. Maybe due to the nature of a review article, the entire review and acceptance process was relatively slow. The reviewers were all pretty nice, and their suggestions were very helpful. With the growth of the Materials Today family and the inclusion of excellent research articles, I am optimistic about the increase in its influence.

Niuniu_Li 2021-02-15

Summary article submitted on October 25, 2020;
Received reviewer comments on November 29, 2020: 2 major revisions, 1 transfer, 1 unknown, editor gave one month for major revisions;
Revisions completed and returned on December 27, 2020;
Received comments again on January 18, 2021: 2 acceptances, 1 minor revision, returned one week later;
Accepted on February 15, 2021.

Received good news the day after Valentine's Day, thanks to Professor Gleb Yushin, the editor, who was very professional and nice; gratitude to the four reviewers, some of their comments were really helpful and made the overall framework of our summary clearer. It's truly lucky to be accepted, will continue to strive!