LawLight_L 2021-10-13

I haven't received any news from editor for 11 days...

LawLight_L 2021-10-11

Posted on October 3, 2021
Reviewed by editor on October 4, 2021
Reviewed by editor on October 10, 2021
The current results are unknown~~

材料界李云龙 2021-10-09

Is it equivalent to a major revision? It is said that the situation is even worse than a major revision.

daizhiyong 2021-09-29

Don't worry, just have to wait.

Falcon1 2021-09-16

In the field of testing and characterization of material mechanics performance, this journal is considered authoritative and rigorous. The two reviewers were also very meticulous, raising nearly 30 questions and requesting additional experiments. After major revisions, the paper was accepted.

2021-05-06: Submitted to journal
2021-05-14: Under editor review
2021-05-16: Rejected for English expression
2021-05-23: Resubmitted to journal
2021-05-30: Under editor review
2021-05-31: Under review by reviewers
2021-06-27: Mandatory major revision
2021-08-06: Revised version received
2021-08-08: Under editor review
2021-08-14: Under review by reviewers
2021-09-12: Required reviews completed
2021-09-14: Accepted

MUYYZ 2021-08-31

2021-4-16 submitted to journal
2021-4-20 with editor
2021-4-24 with editor
2021-4-24 under review
2021-5-3 under review
2021-6-3 reject and resubmit
2021-7-28 with editor
2021-7-29 under review
2021-8-29 required reviews completed
2021-8-30 accept

Translation:
2021-4-16 submitted to journal
2021-4-20 with editor
2021-4-24 with editor
2021-4-24 under review
2021-5-3 under review
2021-6-3 reject and resubmit
2021-7-28 with editor
2021-7-29 under review
2021-8-29 required reviews completed
2021-8-30 accept

潇洒哥 2021-08-25

In the year 2020, there would occasionally be multiple reviewers, whereas before there was always only one reviewer. Starting from a certain time in 2020, MSEA started to prioritize the quality of articles. In 2018, I always had one reviewer. Even in 2020, my submissions also had one reviewer. This year, I submitted two papers, but only one was sent for external review. I feel that the difficulty of submitting papers has greatly increased. Moreover, the number of reviewers has increased, with at least two reviewers. MSEA is on the rise.

HR-z 2021-08-25

The first paper was submitted to SCI and focused on the hot forming process, with an emphasis on micro-mechanisms and material characterization analysis. The submission process was like the Long March, and it was fortunate to be accepted. There were seven reviewers involved throughout the process, with four providing comments, totaling 30+. Due to objective reasons, it was inconvenient to conduct experiments, so two extension requests were made, which were approved by the editor (Leila Ladani). Although the efficiency of handling the manuscript was not high, she was a very kind person who recognized the work and gave full understanding, sticking to academic principles. After supplementing a large amount of experiments and making significant revisions, it was directly accepted (I don't know where the rumor came from that MSEA only has one reviewer... Was this an exception this time?)
2020/8/28: Submitted
2020/9/15: With editor
2021/2/7: Revision
2021/6/9: Resubmit
2021/7/12: Accepted

潇洒哥 2021-08-18

Hello, may I ask how many days later will "under review" be with the editor?

yy-yy 2021-08-15

2021/4/6 submit
2021/4/10 with editormit
2021/6/12 mandatory revison
2021/8/9 resubmit
2021/8/14 accept

Translation:
2021/4/6 submit
2021/4/10 submitted with edits
2021/6/12 mandatory revision
2021/8/9 resubmit
2021/8/14 accepted

June。 2021-08-07

MSEA is a journal in the field of metallic materials that is always reliable and trustworthy.

godloveshy 2021-07-12

2021/3/18 submit
2021/3/21 with editor
2021/5/23 mandatory revision
2021/7/8 resubmit
2021/7/8 accept
The reviewer reviewed the manuscript very carefully, added experiments, and made changes to the formatting and grammar of the paper.
The editor processed it quickly. Thank you very much!

academic worker 2021-07-05

The peer review process in MSEA is really strict. There was a question that kept bothering me and the reviewer, and it was necessary to conduct additional experiments... In the end, after adding quite a few experiments seriously, I managed to convince this reviewer.

xiaosheng 2021-06-26

It has been 22 days with the editor, and it still hasn't been reviewed. What's going on?

So1arAy 2021-06-15

Second draft MSEA, very fast, recommend submission
March 12, 2021, submission
May 5, 2021, major revision
May 28, 2021, submit revision
June 15, 2021, accept

你算什么man 2021-06-04

Two months is the first round of review period, and it took a little over 6 months from submission to acceptance.

你算什么man 2021-06-04

2020-12-13 submit
2020-12-16 under review
2021-02-17 reject and resubmit (three reviewers, 45 comments, two months given for revisions)
2021-04-15 resubmit
2021-04-25 revise-minor (two reviewers, 6 suggestions, two months given for revisions, added one experiment)
2021-06-02 submit
2021-06-03 accept
Editor-in-chief Enrique J. Lavernia is really efficient!

小博努力变强 2021-05-20

Hello friend, I was also accepted that day, but I still don't have any proof and haven't received any updates. I wanted to ask if you have any news?

lyz666 2021-05-07

How long does it usually take for you to review? It has been over a month since mine has been under review and I'm starting to get worried.

土豆键盘 2021-05-06

2021-02-05 Submission
2021-03-17 First review, the editor requested an additional chapter on discussion. One reviewer provided fewer comments, while the other reviewer provided over 20 comments. Two months were given to make the revisions, and an additional experiment needs to be conducted.
2021-04-18 Paper revised and resubmitted.
2021-05-05 Just as the vacation was about to end, the teacher forwarded the acceptance email for the paper. It feels like a dream, hahaha, I still can't believe it.
My first SCI paper, I will work harder in the future, let's go!! Thanks to the editor and reviewers of MSEA, the efficiency of this journal is indeed very high.

弘毅 2021-04-06

Hello, I see that you are also in the field of composite materials. May I ask if your research paper is specific to resin-based or metal-based? It seems that the journal guidelines no longer accept research on resin-based and cement-based composites. Thank you.

BIT-Mu 2021-04-06

December 15, 2020: Submission
January 20, 2021: Reject and resubmit
February-March 2021: Go home for the Lunar New Year
March 24, 2021: Repair
April 5, 2021: Accept

做好自己，看开世事 2021-03-26

Submitted an article, hoping for a good outcome.

Will Night 2021-03-16

2.2 Submit
2.6 With Editor
2.9 Under Review
2.17 Under Review
3.2 Required Reviews Completed
3.10 Revise-minor (Two reviewers, a total of 4 questions)
3.14 Conducted an additional experiment, submitted revision, with editor
3.15 Accept
Thank you Editor E. J. Lavernia, very efficient.

享受简单 2021-03-07

1.8 submit
1.13 with editor
1.16 with editor
1.18 under review
2.20 revision (mainly minor revisions in sentence structure and references based on reviewer's comments)
3.2 revision submit
3.6 accept

Editor-in-Chief Jian Ku Shang

ustb-hwf 2021-03-06

Hey guys, does MSEA often give the "reject and resubmit" status? Is there a difference between this status and "major revision"?

So1arAy 2021-02-16

The first paper is in the top tier of Zone 1, which makes me happy.
On October 28, 2020, the manuscript was submitted. The reviewer requested additional experimental details and the redoing of some less important experiments. Furthermore, they required a major revision of the writing.
On January 6, 2021, the paper was rejected and asked to be resubmitted.
On January 29, 2021, the revised manuscript was submitted.
On February 14, 2021, the paper was accepted.