dilirejun 2021-08-09

Excuse me, everyone, how long does it take for "with editor"? I submitted it on July 16th, and it's still "with editor" on August 9th.

XIAOFEIXIANG 2021-08-06

2021, 4, 5 submission
2021, 4, 15 external review
2021, 5, 21 minor revisions
2021, 5, 22 revised
2021, 6, 1 accepted and open access fee paid
There were three reviewers, one of whom did not understand it well and suggested a few grammar corrections. The other two reviewers understood it and asked if there were any similar studies currently, requesting to add a literature review section. I directly replied that there were none. My teacher said that my paper would at most be published in a core journal, but it ended up being accepted by a top-tier journal. It was a slap in the face. It is my first top-tier paper, and I am about to graduate with a master's degree, putting a perfect end to my academic journey.

l... 2021-08-03

How are you doing? I submitted for a month or with the editor.

129 2021-07-30

Not recommended to invest, this journal is extremely slow now, with no end in sight.

129 2021-07-30

It has been 4 days since submitted to Journal, why is it so slow now?

山海ttt 2021-07-22

May I ask where to find this journal template?

yyyyywwww 2021-07-21

Excuse me, how many days after sending it to the editor will it be reviewed? Why is this issue suddenly so slow?

yyyyywwww 2021-07-21

It has been 12 days and it is still with the editor. Is this the speed lately? It's too difficult.

逍遥子-2021 2021-07-16

80% of the hydrological articles are from Chinese authors. Spending almost 20,000 yuan to invest in this journal, wouldn't it be nice to do more to represent them?

哈哈啊 2021-07-14

Almost all of the author guidelines in the Journal of Louisville are written like this. From your expression, it can be seen that you do not want to provide the original data, possibly because you think there are problems with the data. However, there is no need to worry, as very few people have perfect data, even if they are publicly available, there are often issues upon closer inspection. You can handle this from a few angles. First, when submitting, choose a paper with no data or include all the data in the paper. Second, upload the modified data table. Third, do not upload the original data, only upload the secondary data after statistical processing. Hope you get accepted soon.

111727 2021-07-13

No, I saw his reply. We need the original data form mentioned in the author's guide.

仔仔王 2021-07-12

If there is solid evidence of someone fabricating articles, present the evidence and let's all fight against it together; if there is no evidence, it's still better not to make unfounded accusations, let's maintain a rigorous approach in academia.

检查 2021-07-11

Without looking at the original data, one can directly falsify it. You just need to prepare the money. It has already been designated as Zone 2 by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and there is an extremely serious problem of data manipulation.

111727 2021-07-07

Do you need to provide the original data for the article?

仔仔王 2021-07-02

Many students believe that the quality of open-source journals has declined, but the decrease in the number of submissions by this journal is precisely to improve the quality of the journal. I have been submitting to this magazine since its inception, and over the years the magazine has made great progress, with increasingly demanding requirements for perfection, detailed content, clear representation, and compliant charts. Do you think it is easier to be accepted in a journal that receives three to four thousand submissions a year, or in a journal that receives six to seven hundred submissions a year? The acceptance rate is there for everyone to see. Does everyone think that paying money can guarantee publication? People without money or without acceptance should not deliberately degrade the quality of the journal and mislead others. Not every article in a journal is excellent, so even if you come across a bad one, do not completely negate it. I hope everyone can objectively evaluate with a rigorous scholarly attitude.

Amity-yu 2021-06-30

Does anyone know what the difference is between the special issue "Additive Manufacturing" and the regular "Research Paper"?

五谷杂粮 2021-06-23

Our research group is also affected, and our school no longer rewards journals. Previously, our school encouraged publishing in journal directories, but now it has been removed. Moreover, even during the blind review of doctoral dissertations, this journal is not considered excellent anymore. It is treated as an ordinary journal, which should not have been open access. After it became open access, numerous mediocre articles flooded in.

六味地黄丸 2021-06-23

After open sourcing, the mentor has banned submissions due to high fees.

xiaobai 2021-06-22

The journal has already become completely open source. Some people say that open source is embracing the future, while others say that open source is not good. In fact, those who have submitted articles understand it well. Except for a few journals like Nature and Science, the quality of completely open source journals is generally lower than that of hybrid open source and non-open source journals. This is because completely open source journals already know that you will pay before you submit your manuscript, while hybrid open source and non-open source journals only ask if you want to make it open source after your article is accepted. Therefore, the quality of hybrid open source and non-open source journals is generally better than completely open source ones. This journal has a high impact factor and caters to Chinese preferences, but the quality of the articles is average. They charge around $2000-2500 per article. Our research group (at Jiaotong University in the field of additive manufacturing) used to keep submitting articles to this journal, but we stopped after it became open source. I see many people demanding to openly criticize articles, so why don't those who give positive reviews dare to publish their articles openly? If they believe the quality is good, they should share them for everyone to evaluate.

YYYYYDY 2021-06-19

Is it the "with editor" before submission? How is it going now?

YYYYYDY 2021-06-19

May I ask which editor you are coordinating with?

YYYYYDY 2021-06-19

2021.3.19 Submitted to Journal
2021.3.20 With Editor
2021.4.1 Under Review
2021.4.9 Under Review
2021.5.17 Under Review
5.20 Reminder response says waiting for the opinion of the second reviewer
6.4 Reminder response says waiting for the opinion of the second reviewer
2021.6.5 Required Reviews Completed
2021.6.6 Required Reviews Completed
6.10 Reminder response says under evaluation
2021.6.11 Decision in Process
2021.6.13 With editor

I don't understand what's going on.
Wishing you good luck!

红豆 2021-06-15

Submitted for 2 months with minor revisions, the editor's response was that the reviewer found it good and the figures were beautiful. They provided some minor suggestions. After half a month, it was resubmitted and sent to a third reviewer. One and a half months later, it was rejected. The third reviewer was very unprofessional, as more than half of their nearly 20 comments were incorrect, such as not properly defining certain terms. They didn't understand the paper and claimed that I hadn't defined them. To make matters worse, this reviewer suggested further revisions, but the editor rejected it directly. I wrote three appeal letters, but received no response. It took me 4 months for the submission process, only to have my minor revisions rejected and no response to my appeals. This journal is truly garbage.

XJTUWYH 2021-06-14

Jun 08, 2021 Submitted to journal
Jun 13, 2021 With Editor

Translation:
Jun 08, 2021 - Submitted to journal
Jun 13, 2021 - With Editor

ubw8pt 2021-05-27

It has been 20 days with the editor. What does this mean? Have you encountered any colleagues?

annhappy 2021-05-21

It changed in 15 days, and now it has been over a month and still undergoing external audit.

火咖 2021-05-18

May I ask which editor it is?

fyj94510 2021-05-18

May I ask if your status is still "submitted to journal"?

MR Chang 2021-05-18

2021.3.16 Submitted to Journal
2021.3.16 With Editor
2021.4.23 Required Reviews Completed
2021.4.23 Revise and resubmit within 30 days.
2021.5.6 Resubmit
2021.5.7 Under review
2021.5.17 Accept

Translation:
2021.3.16 Submitted to Journal
2021.3.16 With Editor
2021.4.23 Required Reviews Completed
2021.4.23 Revise and resubmit within 30 days.
2021.5.6 Resubmit
2021.5.7 Under review
2021.5.17 Accept

yxf--- 2021-05-17

Hello, may I ask if your status has changed? I also submitted for a week and the status is still the same.