研无止境 2021-12-05

Congratulations! It has been a week since I submitted my work and it is still with the editor. Should I remind them?

阿浩的小跟班 2021-12-04

2021.12.4 accept (English)

czhpy 2021-11-30

Translated text: "Received acceptance on the last day of November, marking a successful conclusion to my graduation journey!!"

我就看个评论 2021-11-29

Have you reminded them in the middle?

阿浩的小跟班 2021-11-21

2021.10.2 submitted to J - Submitted to J on October 2, 2021.
2021.10.3 with editor - Under review with the editor on October 3, 2021.
2021.10.5 under review - Under review on October 5, 2021.
2021.10.29 revised - Revised on October 29, 2021.
2021.11.18 resubmitted - Resubmitted on November 18, 2021.
2021.11.18 with editor/under review - Under review with the editor on November 18, 2021.

The current result is unknown. The first review had two reviewers who provided 20 comments. We conducted additional experiments and made improvements to the article. We hope for good luck and acceptance!

小宋同学 2021-11-16

It should not be necessary, not very certain.

hubugeorge 2021-11-14

Do you not need confirmation from each author?

小宋同学 2021-11-13

The review process is quite slow, possibly because it is a special issue submission. However, the email also mentioned that there is a large volume of submissions, but it is unclear how exactly it is significant. Even minor revisions need to be resubmitted for external review. It took a full four months, which has made me very exhausted.

Autumn是我 2021-11-11

It's okay, MD controls the self-citation rate, although it's open source, it's not considered a low-quality journal.

发sci的张同学 2021-11-09

September 26th submission, October 7th review, it has been a month and still no news...

陈陈陈 2021-11-05

The original text is in Chinese. Here is the English translation: "The original poster only received opinions from two reviewers, but the speed has been quite fast afterwards. I have been updating within the past half month, but still no news."

Nice187 2021-10-30

I want to ask, is this journal chargeable? If I want to submit, do I have to pay?

ZW_WWS 2021-10-29

It should have been submitted on June 25th and only delivered on August 2nd. Suggestions were given around August 20th, and it was revised and sent for review. It only came back in the past two days and has been accepted.

ZW_WWS 2021-10-29

The speed is a bit slow, it took almost 40 days to be reviewed after submission;
I don't know how this journal is doing recently, but it seems like its reputation is not very good, which worries me a bit;
However, I have put a lot of effort into preparing the paper, and I believe it is innovative and not bad. I don't know if it will be accepted or not;
As someone in the field of mechanical processing, a suitable journal would be IJMTM for various reasons, so I cannot submit to it;
I hope this journal turns out well, at least before I start looking for a job next year...

l... 2021-10-29

Wrong, received on 10.27.

l... 2021-10-29

Follow-up
7.2 Investment
8.12 Submit for review
9.24 One rejection and one acceptance
10.11 Re-investment
10.12 Submit for review
11.27 Acceptance

fengzhong 2021-09-29

The first paper was published during my 15-year doctoral study. At that time, the process was relatively slow and it was not open source. It took about 5 months to be accepted, and I was very excited at the time! This was my first paper after starting work, so I had a relatively good understanding of the journal and had strong emotions towards it. The specific process is as follows:

616, 2021: Submitted
626, 2021: Under review
720, 2021: Received feedback with 24 comments from two reviewers. One of the experts differentiated between critical comments and general comments. The comments were direct and constructive.
810, 2021: Resubmitted
820, 2021: Under review again
912, 2021: Received further revisions. One of the reviewers was not satisfied with four of the modifications I made. I completed the revisions and submitted them on the same day.
917, 2021: Accepted
920, 2021: Published online

Overall, the process was relatively fast. It is important to be patient after submitting a paper and not to rush. Personally, I believe that the research level of this journal is not on par with Nature Communication and Acta Materialia. However, this journal has a good reputation and is highly recognized within my field. Its advantage lies in its high impact factor. Unlike the journal "Applied Surface Science," which received a warning last year, this journal did not. Furthermore, this journal should not be compared to the open access journals under MDPI.

l... 2021-09-22

My required reviews are completed. It's another long wait, and the efficiency is too low. Everyone who submitted with me has been accepted.

3232 2021-09-22

Hello, may I ask when did you make the modification and return it? After returning, did the status change? I have made the modification and returned it for 20 days, but it is still "with editor".

追梦缘 2021-09-21

Excuse me, has your submission been reviewed?

陈陈陈 2021-09-21

How are you doing now? I submitted on 7.17 and it was reviewed on 8.9. Until now, there have been no updates. I feel like I have been forgotten...

陈陈陈 2021-09-21

How are you, OP? I submitted my work on July 17th, it was reviewed on August 9th, and the status has not changed until now. I feel like it has been forgotten.

678678cy 2021-09-18

I want to ask, is it only possible to view the status of this with a submission account?

678678cy 2021-09-18

"Submitted on September 14 with editor"

l... 2021-09-14

Someone is slower than me.
投 (to submit)
送审 (to submit for review)
Now there is still no feedback on the manuscript (the date changed to September 5th).

Alces 2021-09-14

Submitted for a month, received reviewer's comments, made minor revisions, resubmitted, currently waiting for the results!!

Gee.Figo 2021-08-16

Yes, indeed. It has been a bit slow recently.

BBCYZH 2021-08-16

It has been 8 days since submission, but it is still "Submitted to Journal". Why is it so slow?

XLiu 2021-08-11

The editor handles it very quickly, and the time depends on the reviewers. Many people have said that the quality has decreased after going open-source, but at least from the perspective of my personal field, the quality of most articles is still worthy of the impact factor, with an increasing focus on systematic and comprehensive analysis. The number of submissions is large, and many are rejected without review, which has probably caused dissatisfaction among many people. Some people commented that it is too expensive and stopped submitting. They criticize what they cannot obtain, but if they were selected, they would be willing to pay for it. What can you do with 20,000 yuan for testing? Some have also mentioned that they no longer submit to the journal focused on additive manufacturing, but I don't know how much you know about us. Many of us who feel good about it still want to submit to this journal and have our work published. This journal now competes with JMST, and I wonder if someone is deliberately manipulating the comments.

l... 2021-08-09

Extremely slow, the 7.2 investment is still being edited. I just sent an email to urge two days ago, but there is still no response.