菩提树 2022-04-19

It's already April 19th, and it has been over a month since the repair, but it is still in "under review" status. It's really frustrating. It has been over three months in total.

lxj晨曦 2022-04-17

This is normal, mine has changed 8 times, although I don't know the reason.

lxj晨曦 2022-04-17

11.26 with editor
12.10 under review
12.29 under review
01.04 under review
01.10 under review
01.24 under review
2.02 under review
2.10 under review
2.22 revise
3.15 with editor
3.15 under review
3.15 accept
The editing is excellent, very good, and the efficiency is high. We like it very much. This is our research group's first submission to this journal. We hope it will continue to improve!

金宇安 2022-04-11

Hey everyone, the "under review" status for me keeps changing every three days on average, from March 18th to April 11th. It has changed seven times already. What's going on?

chen_wu69 2022-04-07

Has your review comments come yet? I have been under review for 74 days as well.

菩提树 2022-04-06

On March 9th, we received revision comments from two reviewers. There were over a dozen comments, mostly regarding language, explanations of specific details, and minor revisions. We made the revisions and submitted the revised version on March 17th. As of April 6th, the manuscript is still under review. During this period, we also submitted another article and received constructive feedback from the editor. However, the editor mentioned that the volume of the manuscript is too large and suggested that we consider submitting it elsewhere. Therefore, we submitted it to a faster publication.

刘闪 2022-04-03

May I ask, how long does it usually take to receive the bill after acceptance?

gutilixue 2022-03-30

Materials & Design is becoming increasingly difficult. The real-time impact factor has already reached 9.3. Our research group has been rejected for several papers. Afterward, we should steadily enter the first quartile.

行走的五花肉hhh 2022-03-05

2021.9.27 Submission
2021.10.30 First revision, two reviewers provided fair comments and gave 20 days for revision, additional experiments were required, extended by 10 days
2021.11.30 Submitted revised manuscript, coincided with the pandemic and Chinese New Year
2022.3.05 Accepted by the editor directly, overall the editor was good and did not delay the review process, there were several substantial revisions which resulted in a longer review time, a reminder was sent in between and the editor quickly responded asking for patience; the questions were answered positively, the revisions were appropriate, so there was a high chance of good news.

发sci的张同学 2022-03-05

1.23投，3.3送审，，，太慢了，，，

1.23投 (1.23投) - Invested on January 23rd
3.3送审 (3.3送审) - Submitted for review on March 3rd
太慢了 (太慢了) - Too slow

Translation:
Invested on January 23rd, submitted for review on March 3rd... Too slow...

ZW_WWS 2022-02-28

This time is faster, probably because the content is related to the previous one, and it was easier to find reviewers. Submitted on 12.20, sent out around 01.10, received reviewer's comments around 01.24, made minor revisions, but due to the Lunar New Year, the revision was sent back later. It was accepted on 2.15.

爱举铁的兔子 2022-02-09

Excuse me, has your with editor status changed now? My status has been like this for almost 3 weeks, and I don't know what's going on.

853007793@qq.com 2022-01-31

In early December, I submitted an article and received revision suggestions after a month. Two weeks later, I completed the revisions and submitted them. After a few days, it was accepted. The time from submission to acceptance was about one and a half months, and the editing efficiency was high. This is considered one of the manuscripts that has been handled relatively quickly among the journals I have submitted to.

yuanyuan@ 2022-01-27

77 days under review, it's too slow.

菩提树 2022-01-24

2022.01.10 submission, still with editor on 2022.01.24. Previously, one article was under editor review for one week, and then it was under review. This time, the process is slightly slower.

Eggsphalt 2022-01-22

2021.08.10 submitted
2021.08.20 under review
During the review process, there were multiple changes in the review dates (approximately 6-7 times)
2021.11.26 required review complete
2021.11.29 changed to under review again
2021.12.20 revise (two reviewers, not sure why it took them so long, maybe they didn't have many comments?)
2021.01.08 resubmitted, changed to with editor one day later
2021.01.14 under review
2021.01.21 accepted
Objectively speaking, the efficiency of this journal is average, but it has a decent overall reputation in our industry.

那年花开了 2022-01-20

Received repair information, including Then, place all Data in Brief files (whichever supplementary files you would like to include as well as your completed Data in Brief template) into a .zip file and upload this as a Data in Brief item alongside your Materials & Design revised manuscript. What does this mean? Do I need to package and submit the data? Does anyone know?

yuanyuan@ 2022-01-16

Recently, it seems that there are no comments from comrades. Does anyone know if there is a one-month break after the foreign Christmas, so the current review period will be extended?

yuanyuan@ 2021-12-31

Hello, is the review feedback suggesting major revisions or minor revisions? Mine has also been under review for 50 days, I'm really scared.

追梦缘 2021-12-21

The editing process is very fast.
September 15, 2021: Submission
September 21, 2021: Under review
November 26, 2021: Review completed/Review comments returned

阿浩的小跟班 2021-12-21

Reply 1: The layout fee is $2550 and it may vary.
Reply 2: "Under review" status change is normal, just wait for it, no need to rush the manuscript. If there is no response after two months, you can contact the journal!

笑忘书 2021-12-21

The names of the journals in the upgraded version of the Chinese Academy of Sciences are written with special characters "&" as "&-amp;", which causes matching problems. I see that the administrator has already corrected it. In addition, there is a new ISSN and a journal with the same name in the system here. These two pieces of data should be merged to avoid information divergence in discussions. You can find more information at this link: https://www.letpub.com.cn/index.php?journalid=10202&page=journalapp&view=detail

oathkeeper-Li 2021-12-18

Although I also submitted it, what you said is faultless. Recently, a friend submitted an article, with three reviewers. The first one rejected it, the other two requested revisions, but the editor rejected it. The key issue is that the first reviewer really lacked expertise. You may not understand, but he raised one or two pages worth of irrelevant questions. The author presented high-temperature performance, and he cited a bunch of references, appearing knowledgeable, but they were all about room temperature. He shamelessly said, "Your performance is not as good as others', I cannot see the significance of your work." It's really speechless. Other issues were either mistakes or fantasy, it's unbelievable!

yuanyuan@ 2021-12-14

What does the change in your "under review" status multiple times mean? My "under review" time has changed 4 times, and I feel very anxious. It has been over a month since the review started, and I hope for good luck. Can someone help analyze and provide insights? Urgently seeking assistance.

yuanyuan@ 2021-12-14

Hello, what does the change in status "under review" multiple times mean? My "under review" status has changed 4 times, and I am feeling very anxious. It has been over a month since the review started, and I have no idea when the results will be out. I hope for some good luck. Could the original poster please help analyze the situation? I am anxiously awaiting a response.

dudupipi 2021-12-12

How many reviewers are there, may I ask?

Yao eric 2021-12-12

Jul 30, 2021 Submitted
Aug 3, 2021 With Editor
Aug 9, 2021 Under Review
Aug 27, 2021 Under Review
Sep 22, 2021 Under Review
Sep 27, 2021 Under Review
Oct 01, 2021 Required reviews completed
Oct 07, 2021 Under Review
Oct 16, 2021 Under Review
Oct 25, 2021 Under Review
Nov 02, 2021 Under Review
Nov 10, 2021 Under Review
Nov 18, 2021 Revise
Dec 02, 2021 With Editor
Dec 11, 2021 Accept

The first review took three and a half months, which was a bit slow, but the feedback was minor revisions. The reviewer's comments were very professional, with many specific questions and a thorough examination of the paper. After the revisions were made, the process was much faster. Overall, the journal's review process was very professional and supportive.

Dr.Jiang 2021-12-11

How much does open source cost?

carpenter 2021-12-06

The translation of the text into English is as follows:

Feeling very slow, and there are many editing requirements, such as graphic text summaries, highlights, and citations, don't want to submit for the second time.

2021.07.28 Submitted
2021.08.02 With Editor
2021.08.05 Under Review (This status changed 8 times)
2021.10.09 Required Reviews Completed
2021.10.15 Revise (4 reviewers and 1 editor all provided revision comments)
2021.11.19 Revision1 Submitted, with Editor
2021.11.19 With Editor
2021.11.20 With Editor
2021.11.21 Under Review
2021.11.25 Required Reviews Completed
2021.11.30 Minor Revision
2021.11.30 Revision2 Submitted, with Editor
2021.12.04 With Editor
2021.12.06 Accept

阿浩的小跟班 2021-12-05

I guess they are looking for reviewers. If there is no response in two weeks, then remind them.