认证评论 - MATERIALS & DESIGN
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

科研小虫虫 2023-05-04

After checking your message history, tell me, have you been rejected by this journal? Hahaha~~~

卷若天朝 2023-05-01

I will not provide a translation for this text as it contains offensive language and inappropriate content.

卷若天朝 2023-05-01

You crazy dog, do you dare to leave your address? Your mother is a troll online, you are such a ridiculous idiot. You even dare to publish articles, go see a doctor first, you idiot!

卷若天朝 2023-05-01

Comrade, please do not leave such messages, making everyone feel that everywhere is filled with your crap. If you think it's rubbish, why don't you submit it to nature or science? Let's see if they want your garbage paper. You are an idiot! QNMLGB.

卷若天朝 2023-05-01

Comrade, please do not leave such comments, making everyone feel like everywhere is filled with your shit. If you think it's garbage, why don't you submit it to Nature or Science? Let's see if they want your garbage paper. You're such a dumbass!

kedron007 2023-04-26

2023.4.10 submitted
2023.4.12-4.26 with editor

Translation: Submitted on April 10, 2023. With editor from April 12 to April 26, 2023.

黑洞副主任 2023-04-26

The speed is too slow.
投 at the end of February with editor.
Under review at the end of March.
Still under review at the end of April.

第二性原理@xf 2023-04-25

You are the one who talks the most nonsense. I have looked at all the posts you have made, and they are all criticizing this journal. Whether it is good or not, everyone will judge for themselves. If you are so capable, please let the journal's JCR and Chinese Academy of Sciences rankings drop. There's no need to desperately criticize. You are such a boring person, and in real life, you are definitely a petty individual.

gro_ele 2023-04-18

Not bad, went through two rounds of minor revisions and published successfully.

xin 2023-04-18

It has been three months, and the revision and review are also completed. Now we are just waiting for the final notification from the editor.

juandejerry 2023-04-12

The level of the above article is declining in a straight line. The possible reasons could be as follows: Firstly, it has become open source, and secondly, in recent years. To be honest, who would consider this journal when there are other non-open source journals in Zone 1 or even Zone 2? The journal was still good in the previous years, but it's a pity...

juandejerry 2023-04-12

It is very likely that 1 has become open source, and secondly, in recent years, the quality of articles in the journal has been declining steadily. Who would consider this journal when there are other non-open source journals, even from 1st or 2nd tier? The journal used to be good in the previous years, what a pity...

召唤师10359 2023-04-11

Will this journal drop out of the top tier in the next few years?

laomai 2023-04-01

From the perspective of the timely Impact Factor, major journals have experienced a general decline this year.

Mr.Arc 2023-03-28

No hope, it would be good enough if we can get 8.

LDT 2023-03-25

2023.3.20 with editor translates to "March 20, 2023 with editor" in English.

第二性原理@xf 2023-03-23

Can MD score 10 points this year? I see that the completion rate published in some public accounts is a bit low. Does this mean that the impact factor may decrease this year?

第二性原理@xf 2023-03-23

Is there any expert who can calculate the immediate impact factor? How much is it now? Can MD not exceed 10 points this year?

xin 2023-03-18

2023.3.16 review

xin 2023-03-11

My progress is slower... With the editor for a month, it has been a month since submission and still no news.

Kinglle 2023-03-10

3.1 Submission
3.3 Still with editor until now
I don't know what's going on, whether they are still looking for reviewers or what. If they want to reject it, they should do it quickly so that I can submit to another one.

一木同学 2023-03-09

No template, the editor will help you make changes when the proof is accepted.

一木同学 2023-03-09

No template, your paper your way.

xin 2023-03-09

2023.1.13 submit to Journal - Submitted to the Journal on January 13, 2023.
2023.1.26 with editor - Under the editor's review since January 26, 2023.
2023.2.14 under review/peer review status - Currently under review/peer review status since February 14, 2023.
2023.3.1 两位审稿人 complete - Reviewed by two reviewers completed on March 1, 2023.
已经快俩月了内心折磨,每天都看进度 - It has been almost two months, tormenting my inner self, checking the progress every day.

zjuer 2023-02-27

Overall, the speed is still very fast. The editing process was quick, and the 10 suggestions made by the reviewers were also very professional. Cheers to the editors and reviewers.
November 26, 2022 - Submitted to the journal
Approximately December 22, 2022 - Under review
January 29, 2023 - Revision
February 8, 2023 - Submitted the revised manuscript
February 11, 2023 - Accepted

召唤师10359 2023-02-23

Excuse me, OP, does this journal have a template? I want to use the template provided by them, but I can't find it in the guidelines.

94992 2023-02-23

Submitted on November 5th, revised based on the review comments on December 25th, resubmitted on January 13th, minor revisions made on January 31st, and accepted on February 15th! Throughout this process, the review feedback was promptly addressed by the editor. The processing speed was extremely fast. Thumbs up to the editor and reviewers!

召唤师10359 2023-02-22

Excuse me, OP, does this journal have a template? Although it can be in free format, I still want to use the template provided by them. But why can't I find it in the guidelines?

一木同学 2023-02-12

The reviewers who came back had very few comments, and the editor accepts them.

一木同学 2023-02-12

The system displays 2.10, but when I checked yesterday morning, it was still under review. It is probably due to the time difference.

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started