willoas 2021-11-03

Classmate, the status I see after submission is always "Under Review", and it remains "Under Review" after being assigned an editor. May I ask if the phrase "under review" you mentioned should be in lowercase?

555111222 2021-11-01

I submitted it three or four times, but it was not sent for review. However, without exception, it later got accepted by a top journal in the field and received high praise. So, I don't understand this journal.

John117 2021-11-01

Reply to the previous question: I have not seen the email, but if the status changes to "Under Review," it means it is being reviewed externally. Just wait for it. The first review result will probably be available in about one month. Good luck to you!!!

willoas 2021-11-01

May I ask if there will be an email notification after this journal is assigned an editor for review? If not, approximately how long does it take for the review to be represented?

关灯吃面肝论文 2021-10-29

The review process was quite fast, and the editor assigned two reviewers. It seems that both reviewers were students who casually gave their conclusions. Together, they provided a total of 5 comments, all of which resulted in direct rejection. They didn't even carefully read the article. I've encountered some strange reviewers before, but this time it's ridiculous. The editor also rejected it without taking any responsibility. I'm really frustrated. Attached is the evaluation of the rejection, so that everyone can see it and broaden their horizons.

All scores are 0. I believe these are definitely not normal review comments. I know my own work. Just last June, I published an article in MRC. I am well aware of the quality of my own work, and it definitely shouldn't be this bad.

[Significance: Lowest
Originality: Lowest
Broad Interest: Lowest
Technical Quality: Lowest
Is the manuscript appropriate for Langmuir: No
Are the references appropriate and correct: No
Is the English adequate?: No
Is the quality of the figures sufficient?: No]

From now on, I will directly block such people. What a strange situation.

POMEKWD 2021-10-25

I'm sorry, I read it wrong and published it in the wrong journal. Please ignore this comment, I'm very sorry!!!!

POMEKWD 2021-10-25

I'm sorry, I posted in the wrong journal. Sorry, I didn't have the confidence to read it clearly. Please ignore my comments.

POMEKWD 2021-10-25

2021-9-02 Submission
2021-10-13 Major Revision
2021-10-22 Minor Revision
2021-10-25 Acceptance
The review process is fast, and the expert opinions are truly "expert". However, starting in 2022, it will become an open-access journal (start making money)...

李李李四喜 2021-10-16

7.31 Submission
8.31 Reviewer's comments, major revisions requested by two reviewers, editor allows 20 days for major revisions
9.19 Minor revisions made
10.16 Accepted directly, notification of publishing agreement signed

John117 2021-10-11

Editor-in-chief Gilbert Walker, four reviewers, and 39 questions, some big and some small, were answered in nearly 9000 words. It is recommended that everyone answer in detail, with a sincere attitude, and there should be no major issues.

John117 2021-10-11

7.23 Submission.
8.23 Provide modification suggestions, 3 minor revisions, one reviewer gave top 5%, one major revision. The deadline for modifications is 21 days.
9.13 Return for further revisions.
10.7 Receive email notification that the article has been accepted, but requires formatting and other issues to be addressed.
10.11 Submit revised formatting.
10.12 Accepted.

表面活性剂勾兑学徒工 2021-10-08

Submitted on October 4th, assigned to Deputy Editor (Gilbert Walker) on the same day. Currently, there are no changes in progress.

职业矿工 2021-08-04

The translation of the text into English is as follows:

"Very fast speed
Submitted on May 11th
Minor revisions given until June 8th, with three weeks to make changes
Revised on June 29th (deadline revised on time)
Intention to accept on July 21st, with a request to resubmit after appropriately abbreviating the references
Submitted on August 3rd and accepted on the same day."

今晚吃鸡 2021-07-09

4.6 Submission
5.11 Reviewer's comments returned
5.30 Revision comments returned
6.29 Acceptance
There were four reviewers for this journal, with a strong impact factor. They raised sharp and focused questions, and the process was quite fast. We hope that the impact factor will increase further. Although the impact factor cannot completely define the issues, it is still important.

WQ1997 2021-07-03

Why do some people receive reviewer comments in just 20 days, while it has been almost a month for me and I still haven't heard anything, it's been under review all this time, emmm...

NANOJING 2021-07-02

I would like to ask, what is the requirement for the rate of repetition in this journal?

YangC_Liao 2021-06-30

LANGMUIR 2020 Impact Factor: 3.882

NANOJING 2021-06-30

Is there any requirement for the duplication rate for this journal?

光催化-yh 2021-06-24

2021-04-29: Submission
2021-05-20: Feedback received, minor edits
2021-05-31: Upload revised draft
2021-06-02: Upload revised draft again
2021-06-03: Accepted

YangC_Liao 2021-06-17

2021-04-09: Submitted to Macromolecules
2021-05-24: Two reviewers, one suggested minor revisions and the other suggested submitting to another journal; the editor asked us to submit to ACS Applied Nano Materials.
2021-06-06: Revised the manuscript and submitted along with a response letter to ACS Applied Nano Materials.
2021-06-07: The editor of ACS Applied Nano Materials found that the research content did not align with the journal's theme, so it was not sent for further review.
2021-06-08: Resubmitted the manuscript along with a response letter to Langmuir.
2021-06-15: The editor of Langmuir informed us about a series of manuscript formatting issues, such as modifying the font size of the table of contents. After making the necessary changes, we resubmitted the manuscript.
2021-06-16: The manuscript was accepted by Langmuir!

I am very happy that our research on the surface adhesion of macromolecular films can be published in Langmuir, as it is a leading journal in the field of surface chemistry. According to predictions, the Impact Factor of Langmuir in 2020 was 3.778. Although Impact Factor should not be the sole criterion for evaluation, I sincerely hope that Langmuir's Impact Factor continues to increase, and the journal thrives even more!

shirley12138 2021-04-19

May I ask if it's convenient to provide the submission website? Thank you.

shirley12138 2021-04-19

May I ask what browser you used when submitting the manuscript? I used Google Chrome but couldn't log in. Thank you!

观沧海 2021-03-29

Directly reply within 3 days, suggesting to submit to another journal as the topic is not suitable for publication here. That's great, efficient.

myprayer 2021-03-09

Submit on December 4th
Return for repairs on January 20th, one minor repair, two major repairs
Submit revised draft on February 16th
Accept on March 8th

小T 2021-02-15

I want to submit to this magazine. May I please ask if I can add a contact information to inquire?

Lemonnn 2021-02-01

10.1 Submission
10.30 Received first round of comments. Four reviewers, two minor revisions, one major revision, and one rejection. The editor gave us 3 weeks to make the major revisions, and we requested a one-month extension to conduct additional experiments.

12.19 Submitted revised manuscript.
1.18 Received second round of comments. The editor found a new expert reviewer who raised two questions and requested major revisions. The editor gave us two weeks for minor revisions (speculating that the previous reviewer who rejected the manuscript may still have rejected it, so a new reviewer was found).

1.31 Submitted revised manuscript for second review.
2.1 Accepted.

The editor is Prof. Heng-Kwong Tsao, who is very dedicated and handles manuscripts exceptionally quickly. We are extremely grateful to him for giving us the opportunity to revise this manuscript.
All four reviewers in the first round provided detailed suggestions. Although one of them rejected the manuscript, their questions were really helpful and greatly improved the article.
The expert reviewer in the second round also provided valuable suggestions.
Both the editor and reviewers were very diligent and prompt. We are very happy and grateful!

萧蔷Hedy 2021-01-18

First submission, read the comments, asked senior colleagues, and submitted. It was quick and relatively fair. The publishing agreement was sent within three days of editing. It took five weeks for the review, with two rejections and one major revision, which the editor rejected. The reviewers were very professional and their opinions were accepted. The first submission made me realize the gap and also taught me a lot. Thank you.