认证评论 - ACS Nano
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

科研汪~ 2022-08-22

May I ask what the current outcome is for the original poster?

William930709 2022-08-22

5.11 submitted
6.13 First round of comments received, 4 reviewers, 1 accepted directly, 2 minor revisions, 1 major revision. Given two months for revisions.
8.11 Revised version submitted, currently anxiously waiting.

旼旼 2022-08-19

Thank you all for sharing. Today's article has been accepted, and I am here to offer my gratitude. It was submitted on June 23, 2022, reviewed the next day, and received the first round of comments on July 6. It took two major revisions and two months to make the necessary changes. It was resubmitted on August 16 and pre-accepted on August 18, with the need to modify the table of contents (TOC) image and some language embellishments. It was officially accepted on August 19. ACS Nano is truly incredibly fast and touching.

当校长 2022-08-17

5.20 submission; received feedback after 6 weeks, requiring major revisions from a total of five reviewers; revised manuscript sent back after 1 month, with a response letter of 7,000 words; received a conditional acceptance notice after four weeks of the second review, requiring modification of the Table of Contents; made the revisions on the same day and the manuscript was accepted; the whole process took exactly three months.

这是真的MA? 2022-08-11

Submitted on August 2nd, the status is "Submitted to journal".
Received an email on August 5th, assigned to the associate editor. The status is "Associate Editor Assigned".
So far, there have been no updates. It is the first submission, hoping for a review.

缺舟一帆渡 2022-08-07

May I ask the original poster, if submitted for review, will the status change to "in peer review" or "under review"?

一夜很静 2022-07-16

May I ask about the editor that you assigned?

111111234 2022-06-20

Which associate editor did you assign?

LL 2022-06-09

Will ACS NANO send an email notification like other journals after a successful submission? I haven't received any email notification!

Collby 2022-05-31

How long does it take to receive the review comments?

Collby 2022-05-23

How long does it take to submit for review?

musen 2022-05-16

Assign assistant editor Ali Jarvy within 3 days, and reject the manuscript within 9 days.

zlf1314 2022-05-11

Excuse me, which deputy editor are you?

科研农民工1 2022-05-11

The editor-in-chief assigned the review to the deputy editor. It has been two weeks and the review has not been done yet, so I sent a reminder letter, but they directly asked to transfer it to someone else... I am truly speechless...

Six、 2022-05-10

Submit for review in one week, receive feedback on the manuscript in three weeks, make three minor revisions, pass in one week after modification. The deputy editor-in-chief is a prominent figure in the relevant field, making it a wonderful submission experience.

祥梦伊飞 2022-04-28

Chen Xiaodong is the chief editor. Changing editors is a normal process, indicating that it is going to be reviewed. No need to worry, wishing for a successful publication!

祥梦伊飞 2022-04-28

The reviewer's comments were given about one month after submission. There were two minor revisions and one major revision suggested. Two months were given to make the revisions. However, due to the Chinese New Year holiday, I requested an extension of one month. After the editor agreed, I took two and a half months to complete the revisions. Upon returning the revised manuscript, the editor replied within two days, ready to accept it. They requested some formatting changes, which I completed in one day and returned. The next day, the manuscript was accepted for publication! The efficiency was quite high!

shelfon 2022-04-27

Is Molley Stevens fast at handling manuscripts?

Nanotoxicity 2022-04-20

Submitted on 4.06, assigned to associate editor Wolfgang Parak on 4.07, currently in peer review status, hoping everything goes smoothly, graduation goes smoothly.

Eeffd 2022-04-16

The editor expressed doubts about the reliability and reproducibility of my data. I conducted several stability experiments to address these concerns. After one month, I resubmitted the manuscript according to the editor's requirements. It has been 11 days, and it has not been reviewed yet, haha.

哈哈666 2022-04-07

The submission was assigned an editor on the same day. After 21 days, the reviewer's comments were received, with two major revisions and one minor revision suggested, and a month was given to make the revisions. After 12 days, the revised manuscript was submitted again. Three weeks later, reviewer's comments were received, with one still requiring major revision and two accepted. Two months were given to make the revisions. After 8 days, the revised manuscript was submitted again. After 25 days, a pre-acceptance email was received, requesting formatting changes. The formatting was modified twice in a row, with feedback received the next day after each modification, until finally being accepted. The editor was Deji Akinwande, who was nice. It seems that the reviewers took longer than usual in each review process, resulting in an overall longer processing time.

Eeffd 2022-03-31

I am exactly the same as you. I also gave it to Chen Xiaodong and then transferred it to this deputy editor. However, the deputy editor replied to me saying that he doubts the repeatability and authenticity of my data. I am speechless.

penguin 2022-03-24

Did you finally submit it for review? Which day did you submit it for review?

penguin 2022-03-22

Did you submit your article for review? On which day did you submit it?

冰箱 2022-03-16

March 4th submission is still in the hands of the editor, it has been 10 days. Hoping for good luck.

上官大牛 2022-03-16

Not bad, they hired me in less than two hours, very efficient.

lorencat 2022-03-10

March 10th, already in peer review.

dszpr3 2022-03-08

On February 28th, the submission was made, and on March 1st, it was assigned to Xiaodong Chen. Later, there might have been a change of direction, and on March 3rd, it was switched to William Chueh. It is the first time encountering a change in editors, and until today, March 8th, it still hasn't been reviewed. Hoping for a favorable outcome.

lorencat 2022-03-08

Posted on March 5th, today assigned editor Mathieu Salanne, hoping for good luck.

hbhuang 2022-03-04

We submitted our manuscripts two days apart, and the assigned associate editors are the same. Let's see who gets reviewed first. Hehe.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started