认证评论 - ACS Nano
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

seekyu 2023-04-03

The deputy editor Dean Ho has been handling it for nearly 2 months.

缺舟一帆渡 2023-04-03

The second round of minor revisions has been sent back for two weeks now, but there is still no response from one of the reviewers. Vice Editor-in-Chief Dean Ho is handling it. Has anyone else encountered this situation?

科研萌新66 2023-04-02

My editor-in-chief and deputy editor-in-chief are just like moderators. We have already resubmitted for peer review for two months now, and the wait is driving me crazy.

科研萌新66 2023-04-02

The original text is in a mix of Chinese and English, here is the translation:

"The poster and I have the same editor. I resubmitted on February 1st, but still haven't received any news. What's going on? Did the poster send an email inquiring about it?"

seekyu 2023-03-31

2023.3.31 has not yet returned.

西屋 2023-03-30

Now assigned to Professor William Chueh.

seekyu 2023-03-27

Good luck, I am also Editor-in-Chief Chen.

西屋 2023-03-26

Submitted on March 24, 2023.
Assigned to Editor-in-Chief Chen Xiaodong on March 25, 2023.
Wishing you good luck!

EricX 2023-03-24

The timeline for the submission process is as follows:

2022.12.08 Submitted
2022.12.09 Assigned to Dr. Ali Javey
2022.12.16 In peer review
2023.1.5 Revision requested - major and minor revisions given two months for modification
2023.2.18 Revision submitted
2023.2.20 In peer review
2023.3.23 Accept pending formatting revision - possibly due to funding, the second review took a bit longer
2023.3.24 Revision submitted

This is my second SCI paper during my PhD, and also the first paper to score above 10 in iF. I am very happy and excited. Thank you to the editor and reviewers!

seekyu 2023-03-20

I have also submitted the second review for five weeks.

seekyu 2023-03-19

It feels indeed possible to review the manuscript...

mingming2021 2023-03-18

Recently the review process has been very slow. It has been one month since the second review, but I have been busy lately. It is possible that the teachers are applying for funding projects and don't have time for reviews. Additionally, it is graduation season and there are a lot of submissions, making it difficult to keep up with the workload.

EricX 2023-03-18

Is there a possibility that there are domestic teachers among the reviewers who were recently busy applying for funding?

缺舟一帆渡 2023-03-18

Which editor is handling this, the OP? It has indeed been a bit slow recently.

seekyu 2023-03-17

May I ask all the experts, is there any situation that has caused the delay in response for such a long time?

seekyu 2023-03-17

2022.11.15 Submitted
2022.12.16 Major Revision - The editor requested a major revision which took two months to complete (the system title is "Major Revision" but the content refers to a minor revision decision).
2023. 2.13 Revision Submitted
2023. 3.17 Not yet returned.

月下独酌zz 2023-03-09

It has been two weeks and still no response.

大哥快跑! 2023-03-08

Thank you! Just saw it, indeed, there is a one-day delay in webpage updates.

手工宽粉加个蛋 2023-03-08

After logging in, the "submission" on the left side will display the submitted articles, and there will be a status. However, there is a one-day delay in webpage updates.

大哥快跑! 2023-03-07

Where can I see the status in the publish center after submitting a contribution? I still couldn't find where to check the status when I entered the website.

喔喔 2023-03-06

Who is the associate editor you assigned?

月下独酌zz 2023-03-06

In the hands of the anchor who was hired on February 24th, there were 28 deputy editors, and then there was no further movement. It feels cold.

喔喔 2023-03-06

Then you are faster than me, I am still in the hands of the chief editor, and I guess the chances of success are slim.

薛蛮蛮 2023-03-05

I am also in this situation. I first reached out to the chief editor, and then I have been with the deputy editor for a few days now. There has been no progress so far, and I also don't know what it means.

喔喔 2023-03-05

May I ask if this journal is first assigned to the editor-in-chief (Xiaodong Chen) and then assigned to other editors, or is it directly assigned to other editors? Thank you all.

NVP 2023-03-05

Hello everybody,

Can you please provide an example of an appeal letter?

My manuscript on battery materials was rejected after an external review (2 major revisions, 1 rejection). The reason for rejection was the lack of innovation.
I have decided to appeal.

Therefore, if you have an appeal letter, please share it with me.
Thank you very much.

Vampire429 2023-03-03

Hello, how did it end? I also encountered the same situation.

薛蛮蛮 2023-03-03

Hello, after I submitted my paper, it first went to the editor-in-chief and then was assigned to an associate editor. Does this situation most likely mean it will be reviewed?

EricX 2023-03-02

To see it, you need to go to the ACS Publishing Center (https://publish.acs.org/). If it has been submitted for review, it will display "In peer review."

leo3194 2023-03-01

220616 submitted, assigned editor Kazunori Kataoka
220712 received unprecedented feedback from six reviewers, with countless opinions. Three minor revisions, two major revisions, and one rejection. After rejection, the editor requested resubmission, and it took six months to make revisions.
221227 revised, with over sixty pages of comments.
220113 minor revision for one issue.
230206 revised.
230225 revised for formatting.
230228 finally accepted.

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started