CDC 2023-01-22

23.01.17 Revised Manuscript Submitted
23.01.18 Under Review
23.01.20 Accept

Translation:
23.01.17 Revised Manuscript Submitted
23.01.18 Under Review
23.01.20 Accept

CDC 2023-01-17

22.12.22 Submitted to journal
22.12.2X With editor
23.01.09 Minor revision

潇洒哥 2023-01-16

No matter what you say, the influence of JMST is there. The current impact factor is 9.350, and the official impact factor for June this year is approximately 12. Apart from Nature Communication and Science Advances, this is the only journal in the field of materials science with an impact factor above 10. Although Acta Materialia has a good reputation, the current Acta no longer focuses on metal materials. Non-metallic materials and computational articles make up a large proportion now. JMST is expected to surpass Acta's historical position and become the leader in the field of metal materials in the future.

778899catalysis 2023-01-05

Nonsense, the quality of that article is really poor. Where did it come from? (Many of the picture data cannot be seen clearly), stop talking nonsense. Applied Surface Science is far from being included in this journal. Applied Surface Science can only revolve around an impact factor of 6-7, and the quality of the articles keeps declining. I think this classmate shouldn't always talk about how good domestic journals are. If you really have the ability, support domestic journals with good work.

778899catalysis 2023-01-05

Is this person on the wrong medication? How can they say that saying good things can lead to success? Domestic journals are already progressing rapidly, and many journals have gradually surpassed foreign journals. This troll should stop always saying negative things and being so sarcastic!

花柳朵 2023-01-04

It's all based on personal connections. Look at the dates, many are accepted in less than 20 days with an urgent fee. By speaking well, one can secure acceptance. Domestic journals are still far less authoritative than international journals, with higher quality.

花柳朵 2023-01-04

The quality of the article is very poor, many images cannot be seen clearly, too blurry, negative review. Domestic journals are all based on personal connections. It is not as good as Applied Surface Science.

催而化之 2022-12-22

A very good magazine. I prepared according to AFM's format and quality. It was very smooth to be accepted. Then I researched this magazine and found that it is a potential stock. It publishes about 1000 articles per year, which is definitely considered large in national journals. Moreover, its impact factor is above 10, which is really not easy. Its immediate factor has already surpassed Nano Research, and it is estimated that in a couple of years, it will become the leading journal in national materials. Moreover, I heard that they have started working on some high-level sub-journals, if JMST energy...

读者665 2022-12-18

It has been 6 days since submission, and it is still "Manuscript Submitted." It is really slow. Even if it gets rejected, it wouldn't hurt to have a faster response. This submission is wasting too much time.

Pu 2022-12-15

I have not received any email notification about the charges yet. It should be a publication fee for the paper. I saw downstairs that it varies from 5000 to 7000.

Pu 2022-12-15

There's an editor, and it was just one day, the next day it was under review, so I didn't write.

张大帅1996 2022-12-15

Excuse me, does the host of this forum need to pay a page fee for this journal? Thank you.

张大帅1996 2022-12-15

Excuse me, may I ask if there is a page fee for this journal? Thank you.

张大帅1996 2022-12-15

Excuse me, can I ask if this journal requires a page fee?

张大帅1996 2022-12-15

May I ask, does the host charge a page fee for this journal?

CSgogogo 2022-12-13

Excuse me, for this journal, is there no "with editor" status for the first submission?

Pu 2022-12-07

I wish JMST will continue to improve.

Ranpii 2022-11-22

2022.9.21 Submitted to journal
2022.9.22 Under review
2022.10.23 Decision in process
2022.10.23 Major revision
2022.11.16 The revised JMST manuscript has been submitted
2022.11.16 Revisions being processed
2022.11.18 Accept
Overall, the speed was quite fast. A total of three reviewers provided 32 comments in total. Two reviewers gave minor revisions, while the other reviewer suggested major revisions. The editor ultimately decided on major revisions. It took one week to make the revisions and supplement the data, and the reviewers' comments were fair and reasonable.

Pu 2022-11-22

Submission experience:
2022.10.29 submitted to journal
2022.10.30 with editor
2022.10.31 under review (changed 5 times)
2022.11.20 decision in process
2022.11.21 major revision
2022.12.01 revised manuscript submitted
2022.12.01 under review
2022.12.05 under review
2022.12.06 Decision in Process
2022.12.07 accept

Pu 2022-11-21

How many reviewers are there usually?

一支黑团子 2022-11-19

I don't have it, I'm just guessing.

laser_001 2022-11-19

Is there any indication in the email about the expected breakthrough of next year's JMST's IF?

laser_001 2022-11-19

Excuse me, does the email mention how much the IF is expected to exceed next year?

一支黑团子 2022-11-16

2022.10.9 Submitted to Journal
2022.10.15 Under Review
2022.10.22 Decision in Process (No Required Reviewers Completed in between)
2022.10.23 Major Revision
2022.11.02 Revised Manuscript submitted
2022.11.14 Under Review (Waited for 12 days before being reviewed, and the decision was made within two hours after review, I was really anxious)
2022.11.15 Accept (I think it was accepted without being sent back to the reviewers)
It took 37 days from submission to acceptance, the fastest paper so far. I wish JMST continued to improve and its impact factor to exceed 15 next year!!!!

xxxxxrong 2022-11-11

I voted on the 4th, it has been really slow recently.

科研小鼠 2022-11-11

What date did you vote? I already voted on the 1st, and now it's still in the initial assessment stage! It's been a bit slow recently!!!

xxxxxrong 2022-11-10

Do you have any friends who have recently submitted articles? My paper has been in the "with editor" status since the 6th, is this normal?

科研小鼠 2022-11-05

What specific changes have been made to the impact factor algorithm? Can you please inform me?

催而化之 2022-11-05

This is a rare and excellent magazine, with both quantity and value on the rise. Even with a conservative estimate, its impact factor is expected to remain above 10 next year. It is worth noting that this year SCI changed the calculation method for impact factor, and many magazines will experience a direct decline in their impact factors next year. However, this magazine has been able to continuously increase its impact factor through an increase in the number of publications and changing the rules of the game. Its influence will soon surpass many other well-known material journals. Keep up the good work and push forward! @

潇洒哥 2022-10-31

If someone passes at 15 years old after 23 years, it would be excessive. It feels like 13-14 is about the same.