MUYYZ 2021-01-18

2020-9-28 submitted;
Then, during the process, there were several changes in the dates under consideration, which were October 1st, 2nd, 5th, 13th, 14th, November 3rd, 5th, 12th, 28th;
2020-11-30 major revision, with three reviewers, two explicitly mentioning minor revisions, each with two questions, and the third reviewer raising three questions;
2020-12-19 revision submitted;
Then there were several more instances of under consideration;
2021-1-15 accept;
However, the journal has been downgraded to the third tier (upgraded version). I hope it can be upgraded to the second tier by the time of graduation, go!

muyu113118 2021-01-16

Don't be discouraged, OP. Some reviewers are just like that, irresponsible. Last year, I submitted a work on method innovation to JMCA, and it was rejected almost immediately. They raised a lot of unrelated questions and criticized the lack of innovation, and even asked me to cite 5 specific references. Later, I submitted it to Angew, and it got accepted. I am still grateful for the rejection from the reviewer at that time. So, try submitting to a different journal, you might encounter a reviewer who appreciates and understands your work.

奇奇 2021-01-16

11.18 submitted
12.21 major revised
12.31 minor revised
1.4 accepted
1.16 proof

3° 2021-01-14

May I ask how much representation is needed if the degree of representation is not sufficient?

yingz 2021-01-13

Two months after the revision, the reviewer was particularly meticulous. In addition to providing modification suggestions, they also helped correct some grammatical issues.

胜利阳光 2021-01-09

The reviewers and editors are all very good. The review process of this journal usually takes about a month, and I hope this journal will continue to improve.