认证评论 - ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

一棵小草 2021-07-16

Who is the editor-in-chief of the manuscript?

zz123 2021-07-16

It has been three months since the submission, and there is still no news after the first review for revision. Is it going to be abandoned?

ennlemon 2021-07-14

3.25 Submission
5.5 First review result
5.26 Return
7.1 Second review minor revision
7.5 Return
7.8 Formatting modification
7.8 Return
7.12 Acceptance

自渡_zy 2021-07-11

On June 21st, the second review comments were received. Three reviewers accepted them, while the fourth reviewer asked for detailed parameters, even finer than before. On July 2nd, the second review comments were returned, and the editor submitted it for review again. It has been 9 days already, and this waiting is too agonizing. The first paper has been quite a hassle...

XIAOYANGXIAOEN 2021-07-11

4.20 Submission
6.3 First review comments received, one suggestion for resubmission, one major revision, no need to conduct additional experiments, a total of 8 questions from two reviewers, 21 days given for revisions based on editor's comments.
7.7 Submit revised version
7.8 Second review comments received, only technical issues need to be addressed
7.9 Submit revised version, received half an hour later
7.9 Sign copyright agreement
Waiting for publication.

tuantuan- 2021-07-10

There is another important thing, sometimes the status on the website is completely inaccurate. Hmph, it makes me anxiously wait every day.

tuantuan- 2021-07-10

Article in the field of biomaterials
Submitted on May 14th, received the email from the assigned editor on around the 19th and sent for review. The review process was really fast! Online sources mentioned that reviewers are given 21 days for review.
Received the major revision comments on June 4th, given 21 days for revision. Also received non-specific modifications and an invitation for additional cover (which required payment, so I declined as it didn't seem meaningful).
Replied to the revision comments on June 16th, there were no difficult questions, so the response was relatively easy. Made a few small experiments to supplement.
Now it's the anxious waiting period.
Finally received a response on July 8th, and it was accepted directly!!!
First time submitting, went through many difficulties, but finally got accepted in AMI. Sincere thanks to Prof. Nicolas Voelcker for editing, the speed was really impressive! It made me realize that even after major revisions, direct acceptance is possible! (I thoroughly checked the formatting issues, including reference format and capitalization of each word in the article title when responding to the revision comments)
The important thing is plagiarism check, I'm not sure about the specific requirement, but I checked and found 21% similarity, with the highest single section being 1%, and they didn't ask me to reduce it further.

潜风牧云 2021-07-05

Received the third AMI, big thumbs up, hope to reach 10+ soon.

tuantuan- 2021-07-01

How long will you know the result of the repair when you return? Can you get the result after one month of major repairs?

沉梦昂志 2021-07-01

Posted at 4.30, edited and submitted for review three days later.
On June 8th, the first round of reviewer's comments came back. There were three reviewers, one minor revision, and two major revisions, totaling around 35 issues.
On June 28th, the revised manuscript was sent back. Three days later, the editor prepared to accept it directly, with only two minor issues modified. The whole process took about two months, which can be considered relatively smooth.

DragonMa 2021-06-30

The latest impact factor is 9.229, which is even stronger than the water king CEJ's negligence of duty!!!!!!!!! Let's go! Let's reach 10 soon!

zz123 2021-06-25

Waiting for the result in silence, make a wish, if fortunate, will come back to share the process.

lilifefe 2021-06-25

Submitted on March 23rd.
Review results came out on April 21st. There were 4 reviewers, 2 minor revisions, 1 major revision, and 1 rejection, with approximately 25 questions. The editor requested a major revision with a deadline of 21 days and applied for a one-week extension.
Returned on May 17th.
Returned on June 5th for the second round of review. There were 3 reviewers who agreed to accept the paper. The reviewer who previously rejected the paper suggested 3 questions for the major revision. The editor requested a major revision with a deadline of 21 days.
Returned on June 18th.
Pre-acceptance on June 21st for technical modifications.
Returned on June 23rd.
Officially accepted on June 25th. The editor was very nice, and the reviewers were very professional.

自渡_zy 2021-06-19

Mine too, after receiving the review comments, I received an email with non-scientific changes. But it has been 25 days since I sent the revised manuscript and I haven't received any news yet.

自渡_zy 2021-06-19

4.4 First submission
4.30 Received review comments, four reviewers, two minor revisions, two major revisions. More than 40 questions were given, the editor suggested major revisions, but the system showed minor revisions, and 21 days were given for modification. An extension of 5 days was requested.
5.25 Second submission, it has been 25 days now and still no news. Is this second review period normal? Could it be a bad sign?

dataiyang 2021-06-18

Will the modified manuscript be sent back to the first reviewer of the rejected submission?

dataiyang 2021-06-18

Will the revised manuscript still be sent to the rejector's hands, please?

dataiyang 2021-06-18

5.14 submit
5.15 assigned to the editor
6.17 major revision - one small, one big, one rejection. Editor given 20 days for major overhaul.

roy 2021-06-18

ACS Publishing Center
https://sso.acs.org/idp/service/default_login.jsp?pageURL=https://publish.acs.org/publish/login&loginStyle=normal
Check here for the latest updates.

coco1234 2021-06-18

Just asking, is this journal currently in peer review? It was submitted on June 9th, assigned to an editor on June 12th, and it's still in this status until now.

roy 2021-06-18

Will the impact factor reach 10 this year?

laj 2021-06-15

Editor has not been assigned yet.

alejandro 2021-06-15

Submitted on April 16th, then the editor-in-chief discovered that we had written the title wrong and helped us correct it. As a result, the editing time was slightly delayed compared to usual, and it was assigned on April 24th. It was displayed for review on May 3rd. Therefore, if there is no news after 10 days, it should have been sent for review without a doubt.

大鱼 2021-06-15

Hello, upstairs buddy, may I ask, how many days after your submission was assigned to the assistant editor did you receive the copyright transfer agreement in your email? Approximately, how many days does it take for the review process? It has been 5 days since I submitted mine, and the status is still "Your manuscript has been assigned to an Associate Editor for further evaluation." I haven't received the copyright transfer email yet, does this mean the assistant editor is rejecting my submission? Thank you.

每天必来 2021-06-13

Hello, I would like to ask, how many days after submitting the manuscript and assigning the editor will it be sent for review? It's been a week since I assigned the editor, and it still hasn't entered peer review. I'm starting to feel rejected.

Lin 2021-06-13

Posted on April 26th,
Returned review comments on May 25th, with a total of four minor revisions and 15 minor issues. The comments were all very good, and there were no requests for additional experiments.
First revision submitted on June 7th.
Requested revision of TOC on June 8th.
Second revision submitted on June 9th.
Accepted on June 9th.
The speed was very fast!

alejandro 2021-06-12

4.16 submitted
5.19 major revision by three reviewers (two small and one big) requested by the editor for extensive revisions, 21 days for modifications
5.28 revision sent back
6.3 reviewers agreed to accept, requiring content reduction and technical modifications
6.6 R2 sent back
6.11 accepted
ACS is really efficient, hoping AMI will continue to improve! Thanks to Editor Prof. Zhongwei Chen! He is very nice! Thanks to all the reviewers! Wishing my friends good luck in their submissions! Let's start the Dragon Boat Festival holiday!

每天必来 2021-06-09

I would like to ask my colleague, will we send a copyright agreement email to the communication after the editing is completed?

每天必来 2021-06-09

What a coincidence, I also just applied a few days ago. I thought I would be rejected, but it's taking so long for them to reject me. It's agonizing!

crystal0123 2021-06-09

How long does it take to receive the proof after acceptance, please?

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now