认证评论 - ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

复制粘贴 2023-07-05

投稿。

Translation: Submit on the 28th, arrive at the editor-in-chief of KS on the 30th, still on KS now.

dbdxlhl 2023-07-05

After the revised manuscript is submitted, how long does it take for the second round of results to come out? Is the second round of review directly for minor formatting changes?

HeRoy 2023-07-04

It has been one week since submission, and it is still in the hands of the editor-in-chief. I have also not received an email assigning an editor. Has anyone encountered the same situation?

dbdxlhl 2023-07-04

In ACS Publications→ACS Publishing Center→Your Manuscripts and Articles, you can check the status. If it is "In Peer Review", it means it is under review.

dbdxlhl 2023-07-04

Has anyone been assigned as the associate editor? Associate Editor (Osvaldo Oliveira) wants to ask everyone about their efficiency.

风中劲毛 2023-07-04

My submission will take two weeks for review, don't worry, bro.

harrisyun 2023-07-04

June 24th submission
June 27th: Assistant Editor Yu-Guo Guo assigned
July 4th: It has been a week, and it's still with the assistant editor without being sent for review.
For those colleagues who have been assigned to this assistant editor, how long do we have to wait?

JunePeng 2023-07-03

Dear, any news? I am also this editor, but there hasn't been any update on the status after submission...

蛋蛋打不死 2023-07-03

On the 7th of March, it's too early to say, it is still in the hands of the editor-in-chief.

harrisyun 2023-07-03

If you haven't received the email, it means it is still with the editor. You won't find it on the official website.

harrisyun 2023-07-03

How can I know if my paper has been sent for review? Will I receive an email? Previously, I could directly check on the official website, but now, after submitting, the website only shows the status "under review." How do you determine if it is with the editor or already under review?

HeRoy 2023-07-03

Have all of you submitted to the editor? Is there any result now?

蛋蛋打不死 2023-07-01

6.30 submitted - Submitted on June 30th
7.1 分配副编辑Kirk Schanze - Assigned to Associate Editor Kirk Schanze on July 1st
速度挺快的祝好运 - Good luck, you're quite fast

WYH 2023-06-24

Hello, may I ask how long it took for you to receive the article? I am also an editor and it took 12 days for it to be reviewed. I'm afraid it's been dragging on for too long.

Charming666 2023-06-22

Unfortunately, it is a journal that I have always liked.
Submitted on 04.18
Received by the editor on 04.22
Rejected on 05.21 (two reviewers, one major revision and one rejection)
It's a pity.

shaw112 2023-06-21

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
March 27th, Submission
March 28th, Under review
May 3rd, Minor revisions requested by two reviewers, major revisions requested by the editor, deadline is 21 days
May 23rd, Returned
June 20th, Second review completed, accepted after formatting modifications
June 21st, Accepted on the same day it was returned.

Super炫King 2023-06-21

Distribution Editor for June 21st

小皮 2023-06-20

Submitted on 3.31, the review process took about a week, with five reviewers.
On 5.4, the review comments came back, requiring major revisions and a 20-day revision period, during which additional experiments were conducted.
Revised version was submitted on 5.25.
Formatting modifications were made on 5.31.
Accepted on 6.8.
The editor was great, and the reviewers were professional. Overall, the process went smoothly. Hopefully, everyone will have a good outcome.

Super炫King 2023-06-20

The text you provided is already in Chinese. However, it seems to be incomplete or unclear. Can you please provide more context or clarify the meaning of the text?

翻斗花园牛爷爷 2023-06-17

I am also still at the KS editor-in-chief's place, for a week now.

pppppppinzz 2023-06-15

Mine too, may I ask if you are also the editor-in-chief of KS?

大哥快跑! 2023-06-15

Excuse me everyone, it has been almost a week since submission, why is it still with the editor-in-chief?

听歌就不会打 2023-06-14

Submitted on 0319, edited by Yiying Wu.
Reviewed comments received on 0420, with 5 reviewers, 3 major revisions, 1 minor revision, and 1 rejection. Editor requested major revisions, which took a month to complete. During this time, the deadline was extended, and the editor was very understanding.
Returned on 0522 with all 5 reviewers giving approval, with some minor modifications.
Accepted after format modifications on 0613.

熊熊大 2023-06-10

May I ask how long it takes for the review to come back with the comments?

哈哈哈AHU 2023-06-09

Submit for review in about a week, with four reviewers. Three minor revisions and one rejection. The editor gave twenty days for major revisions. After submitting the revisions, it took about another week to be accepted.

陶二小 2023-06-09

Recommend reviewers to find their own mentors.

阿淼 2023-06-09

I see that five reviewers are required for submission. Did you find them yourselves?

阿淼 2023-06-08

I see that five reviewers are required for submission. Did everyone find their own reviewers?

陶二小 2023-06-07

3.26 Submission
5.1 Minor revisions (but experimental supplement required)
5.23 Submit revised manuscript
6.5 Acceptance
The process went quite smoothly. Although it was a minor revision, the reviewer still requested an experimental supplement. Later, it was also realized that this experiment was indeed necessary. The reviewer was very professional. Wishing ACS AMI continued success.

西北蔡依林 2023-06-06

Associate Editor Assigned
Your manuscript has been assigned to an Associate Editor (Dr. Fengwei Huo) for further evaluation.

It has been 5.1 [date] until now, and it is still in this state. Is anyone working with this editor? It's so slow.

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started