cyf 2021-01-28

Reply to the melody of matlab: Who is your editor?

matlab的旋律 2021-01-28

I feel like I have encountered a similar situation. There were two reviewers, one suggested major revisions and the other suggested minor revisions. The editor requested the major revisions, and after the second round of review, both reviewers agreed to accept the paper. However, the editor pointed out some basic formatting issues and requested minor revisions. After making the revisions, the paper entered the "under review" status for a month now. The current status has been continuing for a month...

nanhhh 2021-01-26

I am also Mizhifu, this editor, with editor for 20 days.

cyf 2021-01-23

Brother, I seem to have encountered a situation similar to yours. I submitted it in August last year, and it underwent major revisions by two reviewers for the first time. After resubmission, one reviewer agreed to accept it, while another proposed completely new opinions. The third time was still a major revision. It feels like finding a new reviewer who gave some vague opinions, and the Associate Editor also pointed out issues with the reference format and multiple citations, which seems similar to what you encountered.

cyf 2021-01-23

After the second major revision, another major revision was given. The editing efficiency is still very high, but why is a new reviewer added each time? And every time there is a major revision, could it be a never-ending loop?!

sddn 2021-01-22

The reviewing process feels quite fast, and it indeed greatly helps improve the quality of the article. However, the editing process is a bit slow. It takes around 10 days for the Executive editor and editor, and then another 10 days for the associate editor to review it before finding reviewers. After submitting the revised manuscript, the process starts all over again with the reviewers. Then, it takes about 10 days for the review to be completed. Haha, I strongly urge the editors to improve efficiency.

白云 2021-01-22

I guess after the second review, there were reviewers who disagreed with publication. However, the editor didn't want to reject it, so they are giving you another chance for another review. Generally, JCLP requires approval from three reviewers before accepting for publication.

jyj928 2021-01-21

May I ask, how is the result? Mine is also the same situation.

jyj928 2021-01-21

How can I check the review status from the Elsevier official website chat? Thank you.

笨拙的小老虎 2021-01-21

Sorry, my reply is for comment 533, "I love Sun Xiaomei" and "Clancy".

Just want to vent, why doesn't this webpage have a delete post function... And every time I reply, I have to input the relevant field and whether it should be accepted, so troublesome.

笨拙的小老虎 2021-01-21

In my experience, if after "with editor" there is no "under review" and it becomes "decision in process," then most likely it will be rejected. Be prepared for it. I had a similar experience before when submitting to another journal, where "decision in process" took 12 days and I was eventually notified to transfer it. Some editors are just slow in processing.

笨拙的小老虎 2021-01-21

Second review for minor revisions. I don't think there's a big issue. Just wait patiently. Sometimes, reviewers can be very slow in their speed.

Clancy 2021-01-19

What happened in the end?

135467841321 2021-01-18

Even if the evaluation is low, it is still considered a first-tier institution of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, with an Impact Factor of 7 or higher, and it is still popular.

陌上桑槐树 2021-01-18

2020.12.14 submit
2021.1.7 under review
2021.1.17 Required Reviews Completed
The JCP evaluation has been declining since 2020. However, I have been wanting to submit an article since 2018 but only managed to finish writing it by the end of 2020. My heart still belongs to JCP, and I hope for a positive outcome.

135467841321 2021-01-16

I have submitted several times and encountered the same result as you. There may be several possibilities:
1. Unable to find reviewers or the reviewers' comments are not considered professional enough by the editor, or they didn't reply within the given time. Each time you submitted, it took almost a month, and even if a new reviewer is assigned, it seems impossible to find a suitable one.
2. Another possibility is that there are conflicting opinions among the two or three reviewers who returned their feedback. For example, two reviewers may suggest minor revisions, while one may reject your submission entirely. Normally, if the editor thinks your article is good, they would continue the review process and send it to additional reviewers. I once had six reviewers assigned to my paper. In your case, I guess the editor also holds a positive view, and there is a high probability of major revisions. Let's see if the final outcome matches my prediction.

junglemix 2021-01-15

Thank you for your comfort, just keep waiting, haha.

铁生 2021-01-14

I am also like this, suppressing under review, it's fine. I guess the reviewer hasn't replied, keep looking for the reviewer. This is a good thing, if the editor doesn't think highly of your article, they would directly reject it without continuously seeking reviewers. If they keep looking for reviewers, it indicates that the editor still has a favorable opinion of your paper, most likely requiring major revisions.

PuraPur 2021-01-14

I have also seen journals like CEJ, which accept papers directly within a week.

matlab的旋律 2021-01-13

Posted on July 13th, after a minor revision on December 30th, it entered under review and there is still no result. I don't know what the situation is...

junglemix 2021-01-13

2020.09.04 - Submitted
2020.09.16 - Under review
2020.10.08 - Under review
2020.11.23 - Under review
2020.12.08 - Under review
2020.12.10 - Under review
2021.01.12 - Under review

Dear experts, can you help me analyze what's going on? Does this mean it's not going well...

无牙 2021-01-12

How about editing?

Pepsi 2021-01-11

The article recommended by the original poster is indeed accepted incredibly quickly. Could it be that it was commissioned? I noticed that the article has only two authors who are both correspondents. I don't mean to offend or argue, just casual conversation.

笨拙的小老虎 2021-01-09

Overall, the submission feels that the review speed of this journal is moderate (each review takes about a month), and the reviewers are very professional. The reviews and questions are detailed, including issues with the capitalization and formatting of references. Some reviewers may not have any specific suggestions and only give positive feedback. However, the efficiency of the editorial handling feels relatively low. The time taken from "with editor" to the next step is longer than the review time combined. Of course, it is also noticed that this journal publishes articles that can be accepted very quickly. It is recommended for fellow researchers to submit cautiously and not be impatient.

In addition, I have been following LetPub for a long time and have noticed that there are too many discussions under this journal. I hope everyone can contribute more useful comments instead of posting subjective, provocative, and argumentative remarks. It is a waste of time and effort. It is better to focus on self-improvement. Thank you, everyone.

笨拙的小老虎 2021-01-09

Share the experience of submitting a contribution
2020/07/12 Submitted
2020/08/03 Under Review
2020/08/23 Required review completed
2020/09/03 Decision in process
2020/09/16 Major Revision
2020/10/12 Revised, resubmitted
2020/10/29 Under Review
2020/12/12 Decision in process
2020/12/14 Minor Revision
2020/12/14 Revised, resubmitted
2020/12/29 Under review
2021/01/08 Accept