cyf 2021-02-24

Excuse me, are you the chief editor Pawel Oclon, or is he the deputy editor? How can I consult Elsevier's customer service?

cyf 2021-02-24

Can I ask if you are your editor-in-chief, Pawel Oclon, or is he the deputy editor? How can I consult Elsevier's customer service?

小帅123 2021-02-23

With editor10 rejecting it for many days, I'm not exaggerating or criticizing, but it is indeed the slowest I have ever seen in the first and second districts. It could be because they have too many manuscripts. The direction itself doesn't match, it was just a trial, and I didn't expect it to waste so much time.

青睐 2021-02-23

Ah, I'm done with this~~~
First review, major revisions (two reviewers)
Second review, major revisions (two reviewers, same as before)
Third review, minor revisions (both reviewers agree, same as before, editor asks for one image change)
Fourth review, minor revisions (no external submissions, editor asks for only one reference to be cited in a certain place)
Honestly, this is frustrating. Which article in JCLP doesn't sometimes have two or three references in parentheses?
Fifth review, minor revisions (six reviewers, all new, you read it right, five agree, one minor revision)
Sent back for revisions~ Until now, (Under Review, Elsevier customer service said they invited three more reviewers, and they all agreed to review)
The above content is true, not a word is false, provided for everyone's reference, the editor is Pawel Oclon.

李哲 2021-02-20

It has been almost a month since I submitted my application and it shows "required review completed." Does this mean it's not going well?

xjk123 2021-02-20

The editors and reviewers process the manuscript quickly, carefully edit it, and write a well-crafted response letter. They respond seriously to each point, so there is still a good chance of being accepted.

Aeros 2021-02-20

Share a submission experience

2020 -
8.10 With Editor
8.24 With Editor
8.25 Under Review
9.09 Under Review
9.24 Under Review
10.13 Under Review
10.28 Under Review
11.13 Decision in Progress
11.18 Major Revision
12.16 Revised - With Editor
12.17 With Editor
12.21 With Editor
12.22 Under Review


2021 -
01.03 Required Review Complete
1.14 Decision in Progress
1.16 Major Revision
1.17 With Editor
1.18 With Editor
1.22 With Editor
2.2 Decision in Progress
2.16 Accept

xjk123 2021-02-18

Excuse me, do you not have the status "Required Reviews Completed" after your repair? My major revision was sent back for repair with the editor and it has been three days without being under review. It directly shows "Required Reviews Completed". I'm not sure if it's going to be rejected.

xjk123 2021-02-17

Could you please tell me if we are supposed to choose a new editor when submitting for major revisions? Why was I asked to select one of three editors when submitting for revisions, even though none of them were my previous editor? Will this have any impact? Because the response letter mentioned the name of my previous editor.

xjk123 2021-02-17

Hello, may I ask if you were given the option to choose a different editor when submitting your major revision for resubmission? Why did they ask me to choose one of the three chief editors when I had a different editor before? Does it have any impact? Because the response letter mentioned the name of the previous editor in terms of the topic.

大圣圣 2021-02-16

To do environmental ecology.

kust 2021-02-16

The editor changed sides, it's tragic.

小帅123 2021-02-16

It has been 7 days since I submitted, and it is still "with editor". This is the slowest journal in terms of processing speed that I have encountered so far. If it were under review, I could still understand, but if it gets rejected, then this efficiency is really low.

科研小菜 2021-02-12

It is possible to have an editor for two months for this journal. The volume of this journal is very large, and even if the editor reads hundreds of copies a day, they cannot finish reading them all.

kust 2021-02-10

Excuse me, may I ask, it has been a week with the editor, does it mean the submission will be rejected?

TrRick 2021-02-10

Submitted 2020/08/26
With 2020/08/27
Under review 2020/08/30 until now
It has been five months since submission, and I haven't received the initial review comments yet. The "under review" status has changed more than 10 times. Be cautious about submitting to this journal!!! I have never seen such a slow journal before. This speed is simply outrageous!!! I was in an online chat, and the customer service told me that only one reviewer has completed their comments. Five months, one reviewer. I am amazed.

李先森 2021-02-09

Excuse me, experts, does this journal require a page fee? Is it expensive?

李先森 2021-02-09

Is this journal open access? Do I need to pay for page charges?

matlab的旋律 2021-02-09

After 7 months, it was finally accepted. The second review returned and took 2 months and 1 day to be accepted, which indeed tested one's patience.

Luca603 2021-02-08

How to see which editor I have been assigned to? Can only the corresponding author see it?

瓜瓜 2021-02-07

Exchange submission experience

牛能 2021-02-06

Hello everyone, how long does it usually take for the status of "with editor" in JCP? Does anyone know about Deputy Editor Jing Meng? Thank you.

牛能 2021-02-06

No need for DOI, it's not the reason.

cyf 2021-02-05

Hello everyone, what is the reference format for this journal? The editor mentioned that there are issues with the reference format. I noticed that the reference format for "in press" articles does not include a DOI. Should we include the DOI or not?

cyf 2021-02-05

Reply to the melody of Matlab, there are some formatting issues. Can we communicate about it? QQ: 1720566788

zasphalt 2021-02-05

Now JCP is really TMD delicious, two months still with editor.

willow_yin 2021-01-30

Posted on 2020-08-02, received major revision comments on 2020-10-23, and took 2 months and 21 days for review. (Given 2 months for revisions, the major revision deadline was December 21, 2020.)
Submitted major revisions on December 21, 2020, received minor revision comments on January 15, 2021, and took 25 days for review. (Given 2 months for revisions.)
Submitted minor revisions on January 23, 2021, and received acceptance notification on January 29, 2021. Review process took 6 days.
The associate editor was very friendly and provided many suggestions for improvement. As long as the research problem and background align with the journal's style and the research method is innovative, there will be an opportunity for major revisions. Following the suggestions of the reviewers and associate editor, I diligently made the major revisions and publicly shared the code as requested for inspection. This led to acceptance. It is a great journal that has taught me a lot.

Oliver 2021-01-29

Excuse me, can this journal reject and ask for resubmission? The reviewers provided two major revisions, one minor revision, and one rejection.

matlab的旋律 2021-01-29

Bin Chen

Maggieluan 2021-01-29

One month after submission, they said that my topic does not match their journal (I am researching ecological economics) and suggested that I submit it elsewhere. They also recommended a few open access journals that provide free services. Has anyone else encountered this situation?