认证评论 - Journal of Cleaner Production
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

DeepLearning 2021-10-19

Hasn't moved again since 10.2 was submitted on 10.4, is this normal?
Also, who is the editor and where can I see it?

简单 2021-10-18

Add me as a friend, let's chat in detail.

笨笨哒 2021-10-18

What's up? My decision in process has been 15 already and still no news.

qf123 2021-10-16

Do you feel like you need to control the frequency of your posts? It's already close to 5k.

yydtiffany 2021-10-15

May I ask where can I see which editor is in charge?

Edward_XIN 2021-10-12

2021-9-27 Submission
2021-10-10 Under review (Transferred to Associate Editor by Managing Editor LENG ZHEN before the review process)

Cancerrr 2021-10-11

After the review status date is updated on September 27th, we will start repairing the Buddha.

gsq嘿嘿 2021-10-11

Received at Editorial Office
20 Apr 2021
Article revised
24 Sep 2021
Article accepted for publication
4 Oct 2021

Translation:
Received at Editorial Office
20th April 2021
Article revised
24th September 2021
Article accepted for publication
4th October 2021

zz章章 2021-10-11

decision in process, and it has been 3 days. Can I remind and ask about the progress? I feel like I'm falling behind!

zz章章 2021-10-11

You can search "Baidu" online, usually it's available.

洛离桑 2021-10-09

2021.5.7 submitted to journal
2021.5.9 with editor
2021.5.20 with editor
2021.5.21 under review
2021.7.19 under review
2021.9.19 decision in process
2021.10.4 reject
It was the most frustrating experience submitting to SCI. First, it went through the editor's review, then it was sent to the handling editor, and after that, it went for peer review. It took another half a month to receive the reviewers' comments, which was extremely inefficient. The most disappointing part was in mid-August when my advisor felt it had been a long time and emailed the editor to inquire about the status. The editor replied that they had received comments from two reviewers and were waiting for the third one. On October 4th, I received the rejection letter, and upon opening it, I found that there were only comments from two reviewers. One of them simply stated that the paper lacked innovation and rejected it directly, while the other provided six suggestions for improvement regarding the innovation aspect. In other words, I wasted two months from August to October. Submitting a paper feels like going on a blind date. If it's not a match, it's better to be straightforward and direct. Everyone's time is valuable, and there's really no need for this.

DDDoris 2021-10-09

I would like to ask where can I find the email information of the suggested reviewer when filling out the information? I have been searching on the official website for a long time but couldn't find it. Please help! Thank you, kind-hearted people.

zz章章 2021-10-09

SOS, please help a third-year graduate student. From the first year of research, conducting experiments, writing articles in the second year, submitting them for review in April, and sending them for external review in May, the paper went through major revisions once and minor revisions twice. This time, it was submitted to the editor on September 17th and went under review on the 24th. Until today, it remains in the same status. I hope to achieve a national scholarship through this evaluation. Pursuing a graduate degree is not easy, and writing and submitting articles is truly agonizing. Previously, it was difficult with Chinese articles, and unexpectedly, it is also challenging with English articles. The results will be announced on the 12th of this month. Writing articles is truly a tormenting little demon. From May until now, it has been a painful process. I hope to endure and have good luck. I will diligently finish the experiments, write my thesis, find a job, and perhaps research is not my true calling!

DDDoris 2021-10-09

I would like to ask where to obtain the email information of the suggested reviewer when filling out the information.

Superwave 2021-10-09

I would like to ask, what are the formatting requirements for this journal?

1594369135@qq.com 2021-10-07

Forget supporting, is there any way to remedy it?

lithiumer 2021-10-07

Is one of them called Zhou Yifan? It has been reviewed, I will submit the comments next week.

1594369135@qq.com 2021-10-07

How do I know who the editor is? 10.6 submission, 10.7 with editor. Can we know who the editor is now?

赵寅 2021-10-06

Can we exchange some thoughts, bro? I'm also researching carbon emissions.

简单 2021-10-06

The submission period was set incorrectly, it should be 6 months.

简单 2021-10-06

Many people say that this journal has low standards and suggest being cautious when submitting manuscripts. However, it has a high impact factor and is in the top tier, which makes it very desirable. I submitted my first carbon emission paper to this journal, and there were a total of three external reviewers. Two of them showed great interest, but one rejected the paper, and ultimately the editor rejected it as well. Compared to before, it seems that this journal has become more strict in controlling the quality of articles. I am not familiar with reading the journal's review schedule, so if anyone knows how to do it, please share the tutorial below, and I will provide the review period for everyone. Once again, I want to thank Professor Wang Yutao.

赵寅 2021-10-06

I sent it to Teacher Wang, but it was rejected by the editor after one month.

material super 2021-09-28

"with editro, it will be submitted for review after more than a month."

qxingjian 2021-09-27

Is this journal currently slow in terms of initial review speed? I submitted on September 14th and it is still with the editor, Kathleen Aviso. Is there anyone else who is experiencing the same?

qxingjian 2021-09-27

How long have you been here? Mine has been with the editor Kathleen Aviso since the 14th.

L 2021-09-26

Excuse me, has the manuscript been delivered to Editor Wang Yutao? My submission has been with the editor for a long time.

沈北 2021-09-25

I would like to ask, how can I check the specific review process? It has been over half a month since I submitted and it is still "with editor". I don't know what is happening.

BYgogo 2021-09-25

The renovation has been completed for half a month now, but it is still with the editor. I am worried.

雨落凡尘 2021-09-23

Wait patiently, the speed of reviewing completely depends on whether your reviewer has time or not.

LuJJ 2021-09-23

Is the second review really this slow? I've noticed that your second review has taken almost two months, while mine has already been forty days, it feels so slow. Mine is also under the supervision of Associate Editor Chen Bin.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now