TianyuZhang 2023-03-10

2022-11-21投 - Invest on November 21, 2022
2022-12-16修 - Repair on December 16, 2022
2023-02-06返 - Return on February 6, 2023
2023-02-28 rrc - RRC (unknown acronym) on February 28, 2023
2023-03-10还是arc - Still ARC (unknown acronym) on March 10, 2023
为啥？我看各位修返以后速度都挺快的呀？求解，感谢！ - Why? I see everyone's repair and return speed is quite fast. Can someone explain? Thank you!

October001 2023-03-09

How long does it usually take for a reviewer to accept a manuscript after submission? Is it common to encounter situations where a reviewer cannot be found for a long time? I'm a bit anxious.

Finn123 2023-03-05

3.04 with editor translates to "three point zero four with editor" in English.

l055 2023-03-05

Submitted the first draft on the evening of February 22, the current status is "With Editor".

多兰 2023-03-04

Very friendly magazine.
2022.11.05 submit to J
11.07 with editor
11.09 with editor
11.15 under review
12.2 under review
2023.1.2 major revision (given 1 month)
2.16 submit (applied for a 2-week extension during Lunar New Year)
2.19 under review
3.3 rrc
3.4 accept
A total of three and a half months, focusing on photocatalysis.

Finn123 2023-03-04

Has the holiday started recently? It's been almost 10 days, no changes, so slow...

我是你的解忧酒 2023-03-04

What has been happening recently? The reviewers are becoming increasingly unprofessional, asking all sorts of strange questions.

outflank 2023-03-03

The reviewers were not very professional. Although the two reviewers' questions were detailed, many of them were not professional. After replying to reviewer 2#, he did not review the paper a second time (I refuted most of reviewer 2#'s questions, which were indeed unreasonable, it felt like the editor did not show them to him). After replying, reviewer 1#'s second review had obvious emotions, and the questions became increasingly unreasonable (probably because I refuted his questions in the first reply, as it was impossible not to refute them). Fortunately, the editor is very reasonable and highly professional. After seeing my response, they accepted the paper in just a few days. Thumbs up to the editor.

吴衡 2023-03-03

How are you doing now?

风中云 2023-02-28

Submission experience:
2022.12.3 Submitted
2023.1.3 Under review (7 reviewers: 60 comments)
2023.1.23 Major revision
2023.2.3 Revised and resubmitted
2023.2.18 Minor revision
2023.2.26 Revised and resubmitted
2023.2.28 Accepted

GeJ 2023-02-27

2.23 Submitted to journal
2.24 With editor
3.4 Status changed once, still with editor
3.7 Under review

kirin 2023-02-27

It has been a week for me too, and it hasn't been reviewed yet.

billions1943 2023-02-27

Can simulation-type articles be submitted? How fast is the review process?

我是你的解忧酒 2023-02-27

May I ask who the editor is, so that we can avoid him in the future? I recommend Professor Liu from Tianjin University, very efficient and decisive.

我是你的解忧酒 2023-02-27

The review process this time was very long and frustrating. The editor is Mehmet Acet and two reviewers were selected. The first reviewer provided detailed comments and suggested significant revisions. The second reviewer's comments were superficial and all easily addressed. It took almost a month to receive the revised manuscript. The first reviewer provided comments after about a month and agreed to accept the paper. The second reviewer took two weeks to agree to review the manuscript and then took another month to complete the review. They only raised three minor issues, but the editor still requested major revisions. The manuscript was returned the same day and the editor sent it out the next day. However, the second reviewer took almost two weeks and still did not agree to review it. I am frustrated. I sent a reminder in the middle, and the editor replied and urged the second reviewer, but there was still no response. I am at a loss.

10.31 submitted
12.7 major revisions
1.3 resubmitted
1.8 Under review - reviewer #1 agreed to review
1.17 Another reviewer agreed to review
2.7 Reviewer #1 agreed to accept
2.12 Request for further revisions
2.13 major revisions - reviewer #2 raised 3 issues
2.13 Sent back for revisions
2.15 Under review
2.27 Reviewer #2 still does not accept the review.

leo 2023-02-23

The reviewers are very efficient, but it is the editors who take a long time. Each time with the editor, it takes at least a week, and it has been three rounds already. Almost a month has been spent on this, and people are anxious waiting. The minor revisions have been made, and I am looking forward to good news!

Update on 03.02: Tracking shows that it has been submitted for review for the second time. It's strange that there is a new reviewer added??

。。。。 2023-02-23

Submitted on November 4th, received feedback on December 12th, made minor revisions. Only one reviewer had 7 suggestions to add experiments. However, due to the epidemic, the school closed early and I couldn't conduct the experiments. I explained the situation truthfully to the editor, who had no objections. After submitting the revised version, it was quickly accepted, taking a total of over 50 days.

caseone 2023-02-23

After more than four months, it was successfully received today! Wishing all fellow researchers smooth and successful journeys.

包包 2023-02-22

I am one of 10 reviewers, and suddenly I felt overwhelmed. The first reviewer asked me to cite 16 unrelated references from his team, and I was completely confused.

caseone 2023-02-22

It has been more than a week since I submitted my work for review. I hope to receive positive results soon. Graduation is approaching!

只想毕业 2023-02-21

Decision in Process It has been a month, do I still have to wait? I am anxious to graduate.

cthcthzy 2023-02-21

Has the website submission system been broken recently? The second step doesn't pop up.

outflank 2023-02-20

No need for all authors to register.

outflank 2023-02-20

Received, the second reply editing should have been accepted without showing it to the reviewer, I guess the editor couldn't bear to look at this reviewer anymore.

平66 2023-02-16

Do all co-authors need to click the email link to register and confirm the Journal of Alloys and Compounds account?

平66 2023-02-16

May I ask if it is necessary to notify all co-authors to register and confirm before submitting for review? I have been with the editor for a long time.

outflank 2023-02-15

My reviewing speed this time is fine, but the reviewers are too extreme. Many of their comments can be described as absurd, and some reviewers even express their own incorrect judgments. It feels like they are intentionally causing trouble. It really disgusts me.

outflank 2023-02-15

The reviewer pretends to understand but actually doesn't, their level is too low, intentionally causing trouble. There are no issues with the editor. Perhaps this is the current trend.

magicdragon 2023-02-13

Thank you for your support to JALCOM. In such situations, you can ignore unreasonable demands from reviewers and provide feedback to the editor. If your concerns are not addressed properly, you can add me as a friend and complain to me.

Wangwant 2023-02-13

The latest classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has divided into different tiers, and it has now been classified as Tier 1, but it is estimated that it will return to Tier 2 the following year after a decrease in Impact Factor.