认证评论 - Journal of Alloys and Compounds
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

嘴巴选手小天 2023-05-15

May 13th, major

wildwolf123 2023-05-14

Original text: 楼主,这个杂志投完之后会给每个作者发邮件确认,是所有作者都确认了才进入下一个流程吗?还是不用确认也没关系?第一次投心里没底啊,大佬们也不敢催

Translation: OP, after submitting to this magazine, will they send an email confirmation to each author? Do all authors need to confirm before proceeding to the next step, or is it okay if they don't confirm? I'm uncertain since it's my first time submitting, and I'm too afraid to rush the experts.

wildwolf123 2023-05-14

For the first submission to this magazine, after submitting, will each author receive an email confirmation? Do all authors need to confirm before proceeding to the next step, or is it okay if confirmation is not required? It's inconvenient for the bosses to ask each author individually. Colleagues who have knowledge about this, please reply. Thank you.

spiderMan 2023-05-14

It took 7 months and two revisions to finally accept the first article.
Submitted to the journal on October 19th.
With the editor on October 24th.
Under review on October 27th.
Under review on November 28th.
Under review on December 3rd.
Under review on February 1st.
Under review on February 7th.
Major revision on March 11th.
With the editor on March 28th.
Under review on March 28th.
Under review on April 3rd.
Under review on April 12th.
Review complete with minor revision on May 5th.
With the editor on May 6th, returning minor revision comments.
Under review on May 8th.
Under review on May 9th.
Required review completed and accepted on May 12th.

grayjzr 2023-05-11

Already urged, waiting for the result.

嘴巴选手小天 2023-05-11

How come RRC is taking so long?
Before, my RRC was about to have results, is it possible that it got rejected?

little-stone 2023-05-09

Major renovation or minor repair? Is this kind of modification still available now?

grayjzr 2023-05-09

Reviews completed: 1
Review invitations accepted: 1
Review invitations sent: 2+

It has been 2 months in this state, why is it so slow? Is there no one accepting the review invitations?
Should we remind the editor?

zsdkfjwoigdkm 2023-05-08

05-07 revisión translates to "05-07 revision" in English.

jiafeimao123 2023-05-07

I have been waiting for RRC4 for several days, estimated 7~8 reviewers, still waiting.

jiafeimao123 2023-05-07

It has been four days already, and there is still no conclusion. Estimated 7 to 8 reviewers.

little-stone 2023-05-07

rrc is very nervous

yyyibao 2023-05-06

May I ask where to view the status of review invitations sent/accepted?

yyyibao 2023-05-06

Hello, may I ask where you saw or received a review? Was it in an email? In my system, it has been under review all along, and I cannot see the reviewer's review status.

mww123 2023-05-04

Hello, may I ask where can I find the option to select a short format? I only see options for choosing the full text or a summary.

little-stone 2023-05-04

3.31 Major rework
4.01 With editor
4.13 Under review
4.18 Under review
5.4 Received a review
Wishing for good luck! Wishing for good luck! Wishing for good luck! There shouldn't be too many reviewers!

zsdkfjwoigdkm 2023-05-03

under review, does it mean that the RRC is going to reject the manuscript in just three days?

贩卖机 2023-04-29

"Under review" means that the manuscript has already entered the reviewing process, and the results will be available in approximately one month.

MlhNXuN 2023-04-27

May I ask how to check if something has been sent for review when it says "under review"? It has always been in this status.

zsdkfjwoigdkm 2023-04-26

04.18 submitted
04.20 with editor
04.25 with editor
Guys, why is the date changing again in the editor's hands?

OrdinaRy123 2023-04-25

3.6 Submission
3.25 Major revision
4.22 Revised
4.23 Accepted
The editor is Mariappan Parans Parathaman.

buaa赵立冬 2023-04-19

0321 submit to journal
0323 with editor
0324 under review
0325 under review
0407 minor revision
0419 accept
The submission was in short form, and I appreciate Professor Yongchang Liu's prompt handling of the manuscript!
There were two reviewers in total, and their overall feedback was very positive. The reviewers were very meticulous and pointed out some minor errors in the article.
Thank you, jac!

little-stone 2023-04-18

Same question, there are three reviewers for the second review. One reviewer agrees to review, while the other two have not responded yet. Will we continue to invite them or will the editor make the decision directly?

Finn123 2023-04-18

What is the result after the OP dips?

Finn123 2023-04-18

What result does the OP have behind?

小泽哥 2023-04-16

Five reviewers were assigned for the first review, and three reviewers quickly returned their opinions for the second review. The other two reviewers, however, have yet to accept the review. In this case, will the editor need to find reviewers again for the final editing?

little-stone 2023-04-15

I think it has a lot to do with the research direction. If the editor-in-chief wants it, it will be done quickly.

wm 2023-04-15

3.28 display submit
Until now, 4.15 still with editor
How long does it usually take for the experts to review?
Is there any solution?

little-stone 2023-04-15

3.31 Return for repair
4.02 with editor
4.13 Under Review
Will major repairs be rejected? All necessary changes have been made.

October001 2023-04-13

02.26 submitted to journal
02.28 with editor+major revise (They said the similarity rate between my submission and a previously rejected one was too high, but actually the titles are somewhat similar. Maybe the editor didn't look carefully. I sent an email to explain and ask for the criteria for similarity. The editor said they made a mistake and returned it with the editor)
03.09 under reviewer
03.09 review invitations sent: 2+
03.09 review invitations accepted: 1
03.11 review invitations accepted: 2+
03.23 review complete: 1
03.25 review complete: 2+
03.25 require reviews complete
03.28 major revision
04.12 revision submitted
04.12 with editor
04.12 accepted

Accepted on the same day after major revisions. Thanks to editors Mohamed Henini and Isabel Van Driessche!

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started