Ryn 2022-06-29

Submitted on March 30th, under review after a month, required reviews completed on June 13th, still in this state on June 29th, too slow.

all been accepted 2022-06-27

Rejected, sigh.
They dragged it for over a month and didn't even send it for external review before rejecting it.

loreal 2022-06-21

5.21 Submission
5.25 Received request for author statement modification
5.25 Modified and returned
5.28 With editor
It's been almost a month...

all been accepted 2022-06-20

Over a month has passed TAT.

cc66699 2022-06-13

May I ask if it is still with the editor? Mine was also submitted for revisions on the 20th, and it is still in this status.

all been accepted 2022-06-08

5.18 submission
It has been almost 20 days since 5.20 with the editor.

Hypo1970 2022-06-03

Update: 2022.4.14 for repair; 2022.5.17 revised re-submission; 5.20 until now with editor. Hope is waiting for me just around the corner...

cc66699 2022-05-28

Did the senior accept it in the end? How long did the editor take to accept it?

Hypo1970 2022-05-04

Submitted on 14th September 2021, inquired on 14th April 2022, provided a tracking number showing 1+2+2 for review, still under review.

Hypo1970 2022-05-04

Submitted on September 14, 2021. Inquired with the editor on April 14, 2022 for an update. The editor replied with a track showing 1+2+2 for review and it is currently still under review.

FrankPub 2022-04-22

May 2021 submission;
June response to review, one reviewer;
Acceptance in July.

January 2022 submission;
March response to review, one reviewer;
Acceptance in April.

Overall, this journal has a fast review speed.

天天0769 2022-02-28

Excuse me, senior, is there any news about the article now?

Cyanide灰 2022-02-12

The translation of the text into English is as follows:

The editor can be very dog-like B.
20211008 Submitted to journal
20211028 Under review
20220110 Minor revisions based on external review comments
20220115 Revised
20220117 Under review
20220208 The external review suggests further changes in one statement, but the editor has no reason to reject it.

Hypo1970 2022-01-29

The second submission, posted on Sep 14, 2021, is once again under review as of Jan 25, 2022.

Meeegan 2022-01-03

21.09.29 submit - Submit on September 29th, 2021.
21.11.16 required reviews completed - Completed required reviews on November 16th, 2021.
21.12.19 revise - Revise on December 19th, 2021.
21.12.27 submit - Submit on December 27th, 2021.
22.01.02 accept - Accept on January 2nd, 2022.

Hypo1970 2021-12-27

Second review, Dec. 25. Expected decision from the editor soon, hoping for an opportunity for revision.

Hypo1970 2021-12-27

The first submission has been rejected. The editor suggested submitting to the JAD Report, which is not indexed in SCI, SSCI, or JCR. However, the suggestion was not accepted, and we are preparing to submit again.

eurybia 2021-12-20

A while ago, when I was reminded to submit the manuscript, they said they needed three reviewers, but I could only find two.

This morning, when I received the revised version, there was only one reviewer's feedback with three irrelevant comments. They only requested minor revisions.

Hypo1970 2021-12-17

First update: Dec 09, under review again;
Dec 15, required reviews completed.
Looking forward to good results!

嘻哈hang 2021-12-14

August 8th - Submitted with editor
September 4th - Under review
September 14th (or 13th) - Required reviews completed
September 26th - Rejected
The opinions of the two reviewers: the first one was more tactful, while the second one was more harsh and straightforward. Although it was rejected, it is being shared for everyone's reference.

To be a happy girl 2021-10-31

Is it necessary to write "Data in Brief"? My thesis needs to be revised, and I have been asked to write "Data in Brief." Is it mandatory? Thank you. Urgent.

To be a happy girl 2021-10-31

I am currently in the same state as you, undergoing modifications and editing. They asked me to write a data in brief, but I am not sure if it is necessary to write it now.

Hypo1970 2021-10-30

Organize it:
First article, submitted on Aug. 22; Under Review after 15 days on Sep. 6; Under Review again after 35 days on Oct. 11?!
Second article, submitted on Sep. 14; Under Review after 15 days on Sep. 29; Under Review again after 31 days on Oct. 30?!
Same recipe, familiar taste. Testing our patience and resilience! Hoping for a chance of major or minor revisions!

虫虫9642 2021-10-26

The submission will be under review only after one month, and it will take three months for the review process. After the minor revisions, it will be accepted within two days.

YYYYYYYYYYY 2021-10-25

I feel the same way, why is it so slow?

eurybia 2021-10-21

Translated text: It was updated on the 19th, then updated again on the 20th, but still under review. I don't know if they found a new reviewer or not. Sigh, it's really slow, but there's nothing I can do. I have reminded them several times, but the customer service always responds that it is still under review. Is everyone experiencing long review times?

YYYYYYYYYYY 2021-10-16

I am similar to you, how should we handle this?

eurybia 2021-10-16

First article: After one month of submission on May 15, 2021, it is still "Under Review", with two updates during this period, the latest being on Sep 27, 2021.
Second article: Submitted on Sep 06, 2021, and sent for review three days later. "Under Review" has been updated twice, with the latest update on Oct 16, 2021. It is still "Under Review" at the moment.
Based on publishing and submission experience, journals tend to favor topics related to depression. However, it is too slow and causing impatience. If in a hurry to go online, it is advised to be cautious about submitting.

YYYYYYYYYYY 2021-10-16

The meaning of "应该再找了审稿人" in English is "Should find another reviewer".

Hypo1970 2021-10-12

Oct 11, Under Review. Does "Under Review" once again mean that both peer reviews have been returned to the Associate Editor?