taylor1993 2022-10-15

The state of "required reviews completed" lasted for four days, with a total of four reviewers. Most of the feedback was positive, one was a rejection, and the editor requested significant revisions. There were a total of 29 questions.

taylor1993 2022-10-14

What is the final result and how long has this state been lasting?

小柚子啊 2022-10-12

7.10 Submitted
7.12 Under review
8.08 Major revision
9.19 Submitted revised manuscript
9.20 Under review
10.12 Accepted

Jenny 2022-10-11

The presentation and depth of the analysis need to be significantly improved. Only a general statement about the content was made, while the rest focused mainly on format, language, and images.

Heng Li 2022-10-11

Is it all about formatting suggestions? Does the editor have any suggestions for improving the content?

Heng Li 2022-10-11

Do I need to indicate that I am reapplying when I submit my application again?

hehe 2022-10-10

May I ask if three manuscripts need to be uploaded when submitting the revised draft? Is the first manuscript file the unmodified original file?

hehe 2022-10-07

After submitting the revised manuscript, do I need to submit three manuscripts, one of which is unmodified?

lixinxinxinxin 2022-10-07

Like everyone else, my submission was rejected by editor10 minutes after submitting it, and I have to modify it according to his format. This editor MW's behavior is really disgusting; it's the first time in years of submitting that I have encountered such a disgusting thing.

wo 2022-10-07

It seems that I am not the only one who thinks that M.W. is playing us like monkeys.

Le Gao 2022-10-05

投稿于十月初，立即遭到拒绝。拒稿明细包括大家所说的联系M.W.邮箱，发送邮件后的一天多时间得到的回复写明了参考文献数量不得低于70篇，图片的标题应简要，标题长度不得超过10个字，图片的坐标轴应包括4-6个刻度，并且去掉子刻度，还需要增加具有深度的讨论内容等等。和大家所说的要求也差不多。我犹豫着是改重投还是转投。

304 2022-10-03

There is a website for tracking the status of a certain research paper. You can follow it to see the progress of the paper. Please refer to it!

zhang 2022-09-30

Hello, how did you know that the reviewer has been delaying for a long time? How can we contact the editor to urge the reviewer to review the article as soon as possible?

Jenny 2022-09-30

First submission: Submitted in the morning, rejected by the editor in the afternoon. Sent an email to contact the editor and received a reply on the third day with 9 detailed suggestions. Carefully revised according to the suggestions and submitted on September 26th. The manuscript was assigned to the editor. Under review on September 29th, the process is quite fast.

304 2022-09-27

The chief editor really said almost the same as what everyone said. If everyone is assigned to the chief editor, they can refer to what everyone said. I will also share my own thoughts with everyone.
5.1 Submission
5.1 The chief editor rejected it and sent an email requesting revision. The format is the same as what everyone said, so there is no need to say more. However, if you revise it well, it will take time and effort, but it will indeed improve the readability and overall level of the article.
5.20 Resubmission
5.21 Sent for review by the chief editor
7.29 Received reviewer's comments, requiring major revisions (because the reviewer took a long time, the chief editor had to remind twice before receiving the comments. This speed is not due to the journal being slow, but rather the problem with the reviewer). I feel hopeful that the chief editor provided the revisions, indicating that this journal is relatively recognized.
8.21 Submitted the revised manuscript
8.22 Sent for review
9.25 Review process completed (still delayed by the reviewer; approval for review was only given on 9.10, and the review process was completed on 9.25)
9.25 Accepted.

ouc_gu 2022-09-23

9.21 submit to journal
9.21 with editor
9.22 under review
10.08 Required Reviews Completed
......
This speed makes me feel anxious.

taylor1993 2022-09-23

My system is faster. After 10 minutes of submission, a paper number is assigned, and there are over 4000 submissions. The next step is the initial review with the editor-in-chief. After 10 minutes, it will be under review.

N1 2022-09-23

Submit the review on the same day as the editing, but the reviewer has not accepted the review. It's difficult to find the reviewer now.

frame111 2022-09-23

Hey bro, what's the result now? I've been with the editor for two weeks too.

科研狗子222 2022-09-22

9.20 submit to journal
9.21 with editor
9.22 under review
to be continued (PS: I'm amazed at the speed of handling this manuscript)

yyloveresearch 2022-09-21

It has been a week for mine too, still with the editor.

frame111 2022-09-18

You guys handle the manuscripts really quickly. I have been with the editor for a week and there hasn't been any progress. I'm getting worried.

Nirneo 2022-09-11

10th August 2022, Submission
11th August 2022, Under review
...to be continued!

michaelgaoy 2022-09-07

How long does it take for required reviewers to complete after the submission of the first review comments?

秘密04 2022-09-05

Posted in the morning, assigned to the chief editor in the afternoon. Three minutes after the assignment, an email appeared asking to contact a private email address. This is the second time this year, so I promptly switched my submission. My classmates who were assigned to other editors were able to proceed with their reviews...

月亮 2022-09-04

I also received an email. It arrived 3 minutes after submission. I guess fate is the same for you. I sent an email too, but I'm troubled about whether to submit this or not. It sounds troublesome.

市民7 2022-09-02

May I ask how long did the arbitration process with the third reviewer take?

lemonster 2022-08-25

Me too!!! Just came back from revisions. The reviewer's comments were fine, but the editor's comments basically listed numerous problems as you mentioned above. It's so difficult. Adding in-depth discussions, it's completely confusing. May I ask how you made the changes? I'm really afraid of a tragic second review.

什么时候我也能中一篇 2022-08-12

After submitting, I received a major revision response in 15 days. The opinions of the two reviewers were alright, and I spent a month and a half making the revisions. I submitted on August 4th, and on the 5th it went under review. It was accepted on the 22nd, so the process was quite fast.

西西__ 2022-08-06

Thank you very much to Professor M.W, the editor-in-chief, for the quick submission and review process. The decision was also made very quickly. I look forward to continuing to publish in IJMS.