lamafreshman 2023-01-05

2023.1.5 Transfer Pending translates to English as "Transfer Pending on January 5th, 2023."

linyuxiang 2023-01-05

2023.1.4 submitted
2023.1.4 Decision in process
...rejected quickly, not bad, but still have not received an email today (1.5)

远方的天空 2023-01-04

Classmate, after you returned for repairs, the status shows "required reviews completed: 2022.10.11" and "under review: 2022.10.11". Did the editor find another reviewer?

远方的天空 2023-01-04

Classmate, may I trouble you to ask if after your repair, it is under review again, did you find another reviewer?

泡芙加糖 2022-12-31

Hello, may I ask what does "fidelity" mean in question 6 given by the editor? Thank you. (At first, I understood it as a reason for the insufficient resolution of the image. However, after going back, the chief editor said the modification was not satisfactory and asked me to revise and respond to this question again.)

taylor1993 2022-12-28

12.03 First major revision returned
12.03 with editor/ under review
12.25 minor revision
12.28 Minor revision returned
12.28 with editor/ accepted

mengmengdada 2022-12-27

Good magazine, first-tier journal at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, fast speed, very cost-effective;
In the field of mechanics, it is a magazine worthy of being in the top tier.
In my personal experience, I submitted five times and got accepted once.

Jenny 2022-12-23

I have three reviewers. I submitted it on September 26th, revised it extensively on November 8th, and it was accepted on December 23rd.

小强 2022-12-21

Excuse me, seniors, how many reviewers does this journal usually have? How long is the review period for the initial review?

Jenny 2022-12-11

The cover letter I submitted twice is the same, but I think it's also fine to provide an explanation.

wangsen222 2022-12-11

Hello, may I ask if the cover letter should indicate that I have previously applied and have already made the necessary revisions according to the editor's feedback when reapplying?

wangsen222 2022-12-08

I'm editing and I guess it's just a template! Still making changes, once I'm done, I'll resubmit it. If it doesn't work, I'll switch to another journal. How about you? Do you still want to submit to this one?

远方的天空 2022-12-07

Exactly the same, but the editor did not write "M W". Have you finally accepted it, my classmate?

疾风中的小小草 2022-12-07

2022.12.5 accepted translates to "Accepted on December 5th, 2022" in English.

wangsen222 2022-12-05

I want to ask, are the modification suggestions given by m.w the same, a fixed template?
1. Writing needs improvement.
2. Broaden and update the literature review.
3. Novelty needs to be explicit in highlights and abstract.
4. Highlights should be punchy short bullet points.
5. Get familiar with what constitutes a good graphical abstract.
6. Figures require much more fidelity.
7. Expand figure captions so figures are almost self-explanatory.
8. Reformat with one and a half vertical space.
9. Shorten the title to 10 words or less.

wangsen222 2022-12-04

Was it submitted for review from the beginning? Or was it also rejected and then adjusted in format? My submission was rejected in less than 12 hours, and I was asked to email for comments privately.

wangsen222 2022-12-03

Hello, I would like to ask if M.W is the main editor assigned when you submit your contributions?

allen_hu 2022-12-01

The requirements of EIC are as strict as everyone has said, which indeed improves the quality of the articles. The editing process is very fast, and it can be circulated within 12 hours. There are a total of three reviewers who raised more than 20 questions. After revising, a new reviewer was assigned. The submission was made in August and will be reviewed until mid-December.

疾风中的小小草 2022-12-01

2022.9.13 submitted
2022.10.4 major revisions
2022.11.22 revisions submitted

Translation:

2022.9.13 submitted
2022.10.4 major revisions
2022.11.22 revisions submitted

溺 2022-11-29

Is it normal for the editor of With editor 8天 to be M.W? Everyone says the chief editor is very fast, why am I so slow? Should I reject or submit it for review quickly?

Leeee1 2022-11-27

The second submission to the major revision took 31 days, and until today, it has been a total of 1 month and 21 days. The speed is indeed very impressive.

Primary scholar：Mr.G 2022-11-23

translated:

submitted：2022.9.21
with editor：2022.9.22
under review：2022.9.27
major revision：2022.10.22
reversion submitted to journal：2022.11.17
with editor：2022.11.17
Required Reviews Completed：2022.11.21
accept：2022.11.23

English:

submitted: 2022.9.21
with editor: 2022.9.22
under review: 2022.9.27
major revision: 2022.10.22
reversion submitted to journal: 2022.11.17
with editor: 2022.11.17
Required Reviews Completed: 2022.11.21
accept: 2022.11.23

Nirneo 2022-11-22

11 Nov Required review completed
12 NOV under review
17 NOV Required review completed
19 NOV REJECT

The first reviewer in the initial review process, from theory to questioning the article's data, provided 12 comments. After more than a month of diligent revisions, the revised article was returned. However, the reviewer responded to your comments one by one, sticking to their initial thoughts, which is extremely disheartening. Two arbitrators were sought, but it feels like they didn't even read the article and simply claimed a lack of innovation, making baseless remarks. It's truly frustrating. The editor-in-chief and assistant editor were both understanding, but unfortunately, encountering such a reviewer is just bad luck.

yyloveresearch 2022-11-20

How did your application turn out? My situation is the same as yours. It went from "required review completed" to "under review". I'm feeling so anxious.

ouc_gu 2022-11-18

Update...
11.18 Completed - Accepted

ouc_gu 2022-11-18

10.14 major revision - October 14th, significant changes made
11.03 submit to journal - November 3rd, submitted to journal
11.03 under review - November 3rd, currently being reviewed
11.18 required reviewers completed - November 18th, required reviewers have finished their review

yizhen 2022-11-18

The texts I submitted are as follows:
1. Modified PDF without markings.
2. Modified PDF with markings.
3. Modified Word without markings.
After submission, the editor gave another major revision.

月亮 2022-11-17

My understanding is that the first one is the original draft, the second one is the revised draft, and the third one is the revised draft with marked changes.

MIM 2022-11-16

11.03 submit
11.16 Still with the editor...
I submitted it before, but the chief editor rejected it and sent an email for revisions. I have made the changes and resubmitted it, but there has been no response yet. It's disheartening.

小颗粒 2022-11-14

1. The chief editor mw has a fast review speed. The submission entered the under-review status within 2 hours, and the initial review speed was also very fast.
2. The editor has formatting requirements for paper images and others.
3. Personally, I feel that the initial reviewer and the reviewer after major revisions are different (pure speculation).