Jiachen 2023-07-15

7.10 submitted translates to "7th of October submitted" in English.

手花 2023-07-07

2023.05.16 Post
2023.07.06 Major renovation

xuweixuwei 2023-07-06

Doing micro-nano mechanics, very fast, the second paper in the doctoral period, highly recommended.

疾风中的小小草 2023-07-04

2023.04.18 submitted
2023.05.18 minor revision Three reviewers' comments are all quite good.
2023.06.06 revision submitted
2023.06.26 minor revision Reviewers agreed to accept, and Editor-in-Chief Professor M.W. provided relevant comments on the article format.
2023.07.02 revision submitted
2023.07.04 accepted
Overall, the review speed of IJMS is very fast, and the journal quality is also good. In recent years, the number of reviewers required has increased to at least three, and the format needs to be strictly modified according to the requirements of the Editor-in-Chief.

Jiangyq 2023-06-17

Mine too, after the first round of major revisions, the reviewers agreed with the modifications. The editor made several requirements regarding formatting, paper structure, and language expression, which were only accepted after the revisions were made.

Jiangyq 2023-06-17

Submitted: 27 Jan 2023
Major revision: 19 Apr 2023
Minor revision: 10 Jun 2023
Accepted: 16 Jun 2023
The manuscript was reviewed for two and a half months and received major revisions. The reviewers for the second round of review agreed to accept it, and the editor provided minor revisions for language expression and article structure. After making the required modifications and resubmitting, the editor agreed to accept it.

xywedu 2023-06-16

5.9 submitted
5.19 under reviewer
6.15 reject
2 reviewers, 20 comments, very objective. If corrected one by one, it should be able to become another article. It focuses on the aspect of formation, using some theories of damage as evidence for the process characteristics. However, the reviewers' comments mainly address the damage theory and are less related to the innovation of the paper itself. Planning to switch to another journal. Deputy Editor Sara Bagherifard is very responsible, and the review process is fast.

zealliu 2023-06-14

The conclusion should not be separated by 1234, but can be directly expressed in different paragraphs.

kuaiban 2023-06-11

Hello, is the typesetting done for the manuscript? I haven't received the email yet, I have already preproofed it online.

HHool 2023-06-09

Submission timeline:
March 2nd: Submitted;
March 3rd: With editor;
March 5th: Under review;
April 13th: Major revision; two reviewers, each with three comments;
April 30th: Revised;
May 16th: Minor revision, agreed upon by both reviewers; editor raised some formatting issues;
May 30th: Submitted;
June 1st: Editor's feedback received; two formatting issues not addressed as requested, warned that failure to address them will result in rejection of the article;
June 6th: Modifications completed and submitted, with editor on the same day;
June 9th: Accepted;
Overall, the editorial process was relatively fast. The article requires attention to detail and should have some innovative points to support it. Additionally, formatting issues should be taken into consideration.
1- The title of the article should be within 10 words or less;
2- Commas or colons should be added in the formula section;
3- Homogeneous content images should be grouped together and arranged neatly;
4- The conclusion section should be written in paragraphs;
5- Each paragraph should start with a summary sentence;
6- Image formatting should follow the description in the previous post.

科小研 2023-06-09

3.20 submit
5.4 major revision
5.26 article revised
5.30 minor revision
6.5 article revised
6.9 accept

The journal is very efficient. Upon the initial submission and after major revision, the editor immediately sent it for review. There were four reviewers, and after the first round of revisions, the reviewers agreed to accept it. However, the editor has strict formatting requirements and insists on correcting every single point according to the chief editor's feedback.

小摩的 2023-06-08

Brother, how many days did you guys finally receive a reply from the editor-in-chief?

冈崎朋也 2023-06-07

The first submission was successful, and the editor did a good job. Usually, there are at least three reviewers. The requirements are strict.
It is necessary to follow the editor's revisions, as the processing speed is very fast.
Submitted on December 23rd.
Major revision on March 13th.
Minor revision on April 7th.
Major revision on May 6th.
Accepted on June 7th.

痞子、扫地僧 2023-06-06

2023.03.10 Submitted
2023.04.26 Major revision
2023.05.11 Minor revision
2023.06.01 Accept

The time processing is still very prompt. During the process, only one reviewer accepted the first round of invitation. After receiving the comments, another round of invitation was sent, and the second reviewer accepted... Both reviewers suggested minor revisions, but the associate editor requested major revisions. After that, there were formatting issues raised by the editor, which took some time to address.

痞子、研究僧 2023-06-06

This requirement is very uncommon.

sunngy 2023-06-02

May I ask all the friends who have submitted to Tuzhong, is the first time for repairs always to be sent for review? I have submitted it for a while, but there is no reviewer accepting the manuscript. Do any friends know what the situation is?

HHool 2023-06-01

Just, add a comma or period at the end of the equation. You can refer to the latest article.

痞子、研究僧 2023-06-01

What does it mean that an equation is part of a sentence and that periods or commas are applicable?

wuhu- 2023-05-30

I saw it, it's an acceptance, invitation 2+.

qwe202304 2023-05-29

Did you not track and see how many reviewers there are specifically?

痞子、研究僧 2023-05-29

Hello, what does it mean to not use a list format for conclusions? My teacher told me to divide it into several paragraphs.

wuhu- 2023-05-29

The email notification has also been rejected in the system, which is confusing. -_-

qwe202304 2023-05-29

Has it been rejected in the submission system? Or did the editor send an email saying so?

wuhu- 2023-05-29

My under review has encountered a delay of 3 weeks. They said there were not enough reviewers, but it's not the manuscript writer, it's Editor Wang. What should I do after this, my friends?

wuhu- 2023-05-29

Rejected after 3 weeks under review, the reason being insufficient number of reviewers. Has anyone encountered this situation before...

苦逼科研狗 2023-05-25

The first submission was rejected by the editor in the afternoon. If I want to resubmit, do I need to indicate any resubmission information?

痞子、研究僧 2023-05-23

Mine too, the reviewer agreed to accept the comments, and then M. W. gave these questions for minor revisions. After I made the modifications, he said the first point needed careful consideration. After I made further modifications, he directly gave me major revisions and warned me that if I didn't take it seriously, it would be rejected. All the incorrect responses are unknown. Currently, it is speculated that it needs polishing!

苦逼科研狗 2023-05-22

How many days does it usually take to receive a reply from the editor after sending an email?

苦逼科研狗 2023-05-22

How long does it usually take for editors to reply to emails regarding format questions? I have emailed the editor 5 days ago and still haven't received a reply.

taylor1993 2023-05-20

Bingo, initially the editor-in-chief M.W provided formatting suggestions, but he was not satisfied with the revised version. As a result, major revisions were made, and he had even more formatting suggestions, which almost left me confused. I carefully considered and made the necessary modifications, and even after that, the editor-in-chief sent it for external review ?.