认证评论 - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

蓝天 2022-11-26

Posted on November 4, 2021,
Received revised manuscript on November 6, 2021,
Received comments from two reviewers on November 19, 2021,
Submitted revised comments and modified manuscript on December 8, 2021,
Directly submitted corrected calculation results on January 26, 2022,
Online on February 12, 2022,
Published on February 28, 2022.

bangbangfive 2022-11-18

Entered review on November 9th, the article indicates that the editor invited 2+ reviewers, but until November 18th, no one has accepted the review. I don't know if it's because my research direction is too niche. So sad~~

AmoyGeek88 2022-11-15

2022.09.04 Submitted
2022.09.06 With Editor (Assigned Manuscript #)
2022.09.11 With Editor (Date updated)
2022.09.14 Under Review
2022.09.22 Required Reviews Completed
2022.09.25 Required Reviews Completed
2022.09.26 Required Reviews Completed
2022.09.28 Revise
2022.10.19 Revision Submitted
2022.10.25 With Editor
2022.10.26 Under Review
2022.11.01 Required Reviews Completed
2022.11.09 Accept

Stonyyyy 2022-11-10

Has anyone heard any news? It's been a month for me too.

sunny45690 2022-11-09

Huh? 5 months? Did you not remind them to submit the manuscript? The deadline for mine has changed 5 times already. I guess they couldn't find or changed several reviewers.

bangbangfive 2022-11-09

On November 9th, it has been 36 days since submission, and it is still with the editor. The system has sent a reminder again, and the recipient of the email is now the editor-in-chief, Emre A. Veziroglu.

jz_c 2022-11-09

It has been over 5 months, and the first review still hasn't come back. It is still under review... What a garbage journal, becoming more and more deceptive.

sunny45690 2022-11-09

Has anyone ever urged for the manuscript during the review period? It has been over three months and I still haven't received any feedback. The Hydrogen Journal is so slow this time! The first time I submitted, it was reviewed in less than a month.

sunny45690 2022-11-09

Excuse me, author, have you ever reminded about the manuscript during such a long period? It has been over three months since my article was reviewed and I still haven't received any feedback. I'm wondering whether I should remind them about it.

LGSEEKER 2022-11-07

10.7 Submission
Still not reviewed...
So slow

zhen123 2022-11-07

2022.9.13 submit manuscript
2022.9.14 with editor
2022.9.27 under review
2022.10.6 Required Reviews Completed
2022.10.9 Revise
2022.10.20 With Editor(submit Revision)
2022.10.26 Sent Back to Author & With Editor
2022.10.31 Under Review
2022.11.02 Required Reviews Completed
2022.11.03 Accept

Translation:
2022.9.13: Manuscript submitted.
2022.9.14: Under review by an editor.
2022.9.27: Currently being reviewed.
2022.10.6: Required reviews have been completed.
2022.10.9: Revision requested.
2022.10.20: Revised manuscript submitted to the editor.
2022.10.26: Sent back to the author for revisions and with the editor.
2022.10.31: Under review again.
2022.11.02: Required reviews have been completed.
2022.11.03: Accepted.

索梦善 2022-11-03

Also, the one on September 28th is with the editor, too.

bangbangfive 2022-11-03

October 3rd - submission
October 6th - with editor
October 9th - with editor
November 1st - system reminder, no response, reminder shows it was sent to assistant editor Shohji Tsushima from Osaka University in Japan
Still with editor until now
...

北山 2022-11-01

0820 submit
0821 with editor
0907 under review
0915 under review
0930 required reviews complete
1008 Two reviewers, gave 3 weeks, asked quite a lot of questions
1023 revise
1024 with editor
1031 with editor
1101 Accept

caijixt 2022-10-31

The speed was very fast, and it only took 25 days from start to finish.

储氢术士 2022-10-28

Finally received it. Others received it even later than me, by two months. It has been really slow lately.

Accept111 2022-10-28

What system does this journal generally use for plagiarism detection, and what is the minimum requirement for similarity?

花花大世界 2022-10-27

On October 23rd, it finally went under review.

bangbangfive 2022-10-23

May I ask, have you submitted your article for review, OP?

bangbangfive 2022-10-23

I am also waiting. I submitted my manuscript on October 3rd and received an email confirmation after 3 days. It has been 20 days now, and it hasn't been sent for review yet. I'm crying ┭┮﹏┭┮

huang 2022-10-21

Three days after submission, an email was sent to the communication department stating that it was ready for review, but now it has been two weeks and it is still "with editor".

花花大世界 2022-10-20

9.24 submitted
10.02 with editor
10.20 with editor
Has it been a month already? Shouldn't it be reviewed by now?

zhongchengli 2022-10-20

Posted on July 12, 2022, an article on electrocatalytic water splitting has been continuously with the editor. On August 3rd, it was under review. Soon after, a reviewer agreed to review and returned it on August 27th. On August 29th, someone else agreed to review it, but as of today (October 20, 2022), no review comments have been uploaded. On October 3, 2022, I sent a reminder email to the editor through the submission system, but received no response. The editor has also not logged into the international hydrogen system (usually, the date would change after logging in, but it still shows August 27, 2022). Once I receive the review comments, I will report the name of the editor to everyone.

超超--- 2022-10-13

Hello, author. It has been almost a month since I submitted my revised manuscript, and it has been 18 days since the review process was completed. However, I still haven't received any results. Do you know the reason for this?

冲冲冲啊 2022-10-13

08.22 submitted
09.05 Received feedback, there should be a total of 6 reviewers, but I only received feedback from 4 reviewers. The comments from the first two reviewers are quite professional and only require explanations and responses. The comments from the latter two reviewers are more detailed and include many additional experiments.
09.26 resubmitted
10.13 accepted
The additional experiments make me feel that it would be suitable for submission to a slightly better journal, such as the Journal of Alloys and Compounds. Although the impact factor of that journal is slightly lower, it ranks within the top 10% in the field of metallurgy, which would result in receiving more funding from the university.

zhouyingwangzhe 2022-10-12

May I ask when is the deadline for submission? This process with the editor is taking too long.

超超--- 2022-10-12

Hello, my 9.18 revision was submitted on 9.25. The required revisions have been completed but there are still no results. What's going on?

shilyzs 2022-10-08

7.21 Submitted the paper
Under review three times in between, the third time took a particularly long time
9.16 Revised
Two reviewers, few issues raised
After resubmission, the editor requested modifications regarding the number of highlighted words, etc., and then resubmitted
Then it went under review again
10.05 Accepted

阿布的小伙伴 2022-10-07

The paper was accepted on October 7th, taking about 50 days.

阿布的小伙伴 2022-10-07

August 18th: Submitted the paper to the system.
September 13th: Received feedback, which included one revision request (4 questions) and one rejection (4 questions). The editor advised me to fight back against the reviewer who rejected the paper.
Alright then.
I have no choice but to respond...
I replied to the first reviewer's feedback with approximately 5 pages of responses. I provided additional supporting materials addressing the model mechanism issues raised by the reviewer. I handled it with ease and without any pressure.
To my surprise, the second reviewer claimed that my principles were all wrong. They did not show any mercy for the first three questions, considering each one a fatal mistake. The fourth question was about grammar and some minor errors. In response to the first three questions, I wrote 10 pages of responses. I argued about the rationality of the computational model and the rationality of the principles and methods, citing numerous references from other researchers. I fought back against each question.
September 24th: Submitted the revised paper, faced various minor issues along the way, but finally on
September 29th: It is under review.
September 7th: The second reviewer was satisfied with my thorough response and only raised a minor question. Accept.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started