wulalalalala 2023-03-15

After I joined as an editor, my status has never changed. I directly received it on March 6th.

xiaojianrong531 2023-03-12

02-07-2023 Submitted to Journal
02-08-2023 With Editor
02-11-2023 With Editor
02-13-2023 Under Review (Review invitations sent: 2+; accepted on the same day: 2+)
02-27-2023 Review complete (Two reviewers, deadline 03-19)
03-04-2023 Submitted/With Editor
03-09-2023 With Editor
03-10-2023 Accepted

mediocre 2023-03-08

Okay, thank you, boss. Suck in, suck in, boss, good luck.

花火夜空 2023-03-08

First review: Three reviewers, two minor revisions, which mainly involved language and formatting changes and did not require additional experiments. The third reviewer rejected the paper, stating that it lacked innovation and was lacking in experiments. The editor also provided four suggestions to improve the title, abstract, and highlight the innovative points.

Therefore, before the Chinese New Year, I made significant revisions to the paper, added two or three experiments, made changes to the introduction and abstract, and adjusted the title and keywords appropriately. Finally, I submitted it on the morning of New Year's Eve.

In the second review, the first reviewer did not review the paper again. The second reviewer found no issues with the revisions. The third reviewer acknowledged the significant modifications made and accepted the highlighted innovative points. However, they requested further evidence for a specific aspect of the mechanism proposed in the new paragraphs. Additionally, the editor still believed that there were too few references in the introduction. However, I had actually cited twice as many recent references in the performance comparison table.

I made a second round of revisions, adding some calculations to address the concerns of the third reviewer and including more references from the current journal to satisfy the editor. It seems that the paper did not go through another round of review (or the reviewers did not click to review it) and was accepted directly after a wait of over half a month.

花火夜空 2023-03-08

2022-10-31 Submitted to Journal
2022-11-01 Sent Back to Author (requested that the submission text does not include line numbers)
2022-11-01 Submitted to Journal
2022-11-02 With Editor
2022-11-06 With Editor
2022-12-10 With Editor
2022-12-13 Under Review
2022-12-29 Required Reviews Completed
2023-01-02 Revision (first review results, 3 reviewers + editor, a total of over 20 comments)
2023-01-20 With Editor
2023-01-21 Under Review
2023-02-07 Revision (requested minor revisions for the second review)
2023-02-17 With Editor
2023-03-06 Accepted

WEN007 2023-03-07

Hello, after the first review and submission of modifications, it became "with editor," and then it was directly accepted.

mediocre 2023-03-07

Hello, may I ask if there are any other statuses after the second review with the editor?

WEN007 2023-03-07

12.11 Submitted
12.13 with editor
12.18 under review
12.27 First reviewer accepts review invitation
01.14 Second and third reviewers accept review invitation
01.21 Reviewer's comments completed
02.03 Second reviewer's comments completed, received email from editor (two reviewers, a total of 13 comments), given 20 days for revisions
02.23 Submitted revisions, status shows "with editor"
03.07 Accepted

wangkai19 2023-03-07

2022.11.1 Submission
2023.2.2 Provide reviewer comments (one editor, one reviewer)
2023.2.10 Submit revised manuscript
2023.3.4 Change status
2023.3.7 Accept

老龙 2023-03-04

It's quite strange, I also submitted for revision on 2.19, and it's still "with editor" after half a month. It's really bizarre.

mozhisha0063 2023-03-03

One primary reviewer and two experts in the industry reviewed the paper. It took just over a month for the first review, and they provided major revisions. The deadline for the revisions was January 4, 2023. During the Chinese New Year, I was busy revising the paper. On February 9, 2023, it was sent back for further revisions and is currently "With editor." Additionally, I submitted another paper to an energy journal last July, and it has been under review for eight months. Just a few days ago, they finally found the second reviewer. I am still waiting patiently.

wulalalalala 2023-03-02

Any news, mate? I sent the revised draft on the 18th, and until today it's still with the editor.

超超--- 2023-02-28

How long does it take to publish online? It has been almost three months and I still don't have an issue or volume number.

科研修狗 2023-02-28

Submitted the second review comments on February 19, which was just a superficial question. Until now, it is still "with editor"... It has been a week. I only hope to receive acceptance soon so that I can graduate smoothly.

wulalalalala 2023-02-27

The first paper I submitted was accepted directly by a reviewer after only receiving two insignificant questions. It was an easy win.
The second paper has been with the editor for 10 days for the second review, and I'm getting nervous. Hopefully, luck will remain on my side.

科研修狗 2023-02-27

Send an email to the editor and ask. I sent an email on February 15th and the editor replied the next day with only one small suggestion. I made the necessary changes and submitted it to the editor a week ago, but there has been no response. Sigh.

Cullinan 2023-02-24

What are the chances of being invited to contribute to the special issue of the conference?

sdf457889 2023-02-17

Rejected, unable to find reviewers.

知了 2023-02-14

I am also waiting for the second trial, it has been one month and three and a half months longer than you, and there is no news.

C 2023-02-14

2.7 submit
2.9 with editor
2.11 with editor

sdf457889 2023-02-13

2.9 submit - Please submit
2.11 witheditor - With editor

yyfdemajia 2023-02-09

Due to this reason, I was rejected for resubmission and decided to abandon the journal and submit to another one without checking the actual similarity on arXiv.

科研修狗 2023-02-07

Will it be because I only have one reviewer? Do editors need to find several reviewers? Has anyone encountered such a situation with only one reviewer?

zhangcongcong 2023-02-07

The initial draft was submitted on September 15, 2022. The reviewer provided comments on November 5, with only one reviewer suggesting minor revisions. The revised manuscript was returned on November 26, and there has been no communication since then. The submission system has been showing "under review" status. However, when I click on the link sent by the first reviewer before editing, it shows that the revised manuscript was reviewed on January 4. I wonder why the editor is delaying the decision. I am really anxious now. I just want the editor to give a result, regardless of whether it is good or bad. I am graduating in June, and I still don't have my paper. I am truly worried.

镇西 2023-02-02

Last year, one of my fellow students cited over 20 articles from the International Journal of Higher Education (IJHE). At this rate, it won't take more than three years to produce an Academic Citation Index (ACB).

镇西 2023-02-02

The editor will propose in the email to conduct research and citation in the same field as the articles published in IJHE, aiming to increase the number of citations for this journal's literature.

安东尼奥 2023-02-01

After submission, there will be a link in the email. Opening it will lead to WeChat QR code scanning, which is very convenient.

安东尼奥 2023-02-01

After submission, a link will be sent. After opening it, you can scan the QR code on WeChat, which is very convenient.

夜枫之舞 2023-02-01

It is normal for an editor to take a month, be patient.

夜枫之舞 2023-02-01

Hello, what do you mean by "After following WeChat, all progress changes are promptly reminded"? Are you referring to a specific official account on WeChat? Thank you!