SJTU_LZH 2023-05-25

Brother, I want to ask if it's okay to send back to the author without including a response to the technical check.

油气终结者 2023-05-22

The summary is self-submission, not invitation submission.

asdsafsuh 2023-05-22

I asked the customer service through Elsevier's official account via manual service.

asdsafsuh 2023-05-22

Update 2023.5.21 Two reviewers have accepted the invitation and are currently reviewing.

客观来看 2023-05-19

How can I see the specific number of reviewers? In the track submission link, I can only see that the number is 2+.

asdsafsuh 2023-05-19

2023.5.10 Submission
2023.5.13 Under review until now (5.19). Invited 5 reviewers, 3 declined the review, and 2 neither declined nor accepted.

Jaanai 2023-05-19

May I ask if your summary is self-submission or an invitation for contribution?

油气终结者 2023-05-10

April 8th: Submission, review article
April 11th: Assignment of manuscript number
April 16th: Invitation to reviewers
April 22nd: The first reviewer accepts the review
May 1st: The second reviewer accepts the review
May 9th: Both reviewers provide feedback simultaneously
May 10th: Revision: two minor revisions + editor's comments
Overall, the speed is quite fast!

菜直 2023-05-06

4.26 One reviewer accepts the review.
5.4 2+ reviewers accept the review.

菜直 2023-04-26

4.25 under Review

vector-B 2023-04-26

After submitting, it has been under review all along and then got rejected. It has taken so much time, sigh.

菜直 2023-04-21

4.20 con editor translates to "4.20 with editor" in English.

菜直 2023-04-19

Take note: Submitted to Journal on 4.19. It seems like this journal has a slow speed.

wonderful- 2023-04-18

1.14 submitted to journal
1.18 editor sent for review
2.24 comments received, four reviewers
3.13 not enough time for revisions, requested extension
4.2 revised
4.17 accepted

动物世界 2023-04-12

This content is great.

初 2023-04-12

The time change is to replace the reviewer.

清水 2023-04-11

A bit eager to urge, but afraid of rejection.

vector-B 2023-04-10

Did you follow up? What was the result?

vector-B 2023-04-10

Did you send an email to remind? What was the result?

清水 2023-04-10

2023.01.04 submitter to journal后with editor - After submission to the journal, it is currently with the editor.
2023.02.06 under Review - Currently under review.
2023.03.25 under Review日期变更 - Under review, date changed.
氢能审稿这么慢该怎么办？可以发邮件催吗？- What should I do about the slow review process for hydrogen energy? Can I send an email to urge them?

Pikapkchu 2023-04-07

I want to ask how long it takes to retrieve after receiving? It has been over two months since I submitted online, and I still can't retrieve it. Is it necessary to consult with the editor?

知了 2023-04-01

It has been five months since the second revision. What should we do?????????????????????? We asked through email, but they said the reviewer hasn't replied. I've never seen such a trashy journal.

vector-B 2023-03-31

The "under review" status has been going on for almost two months now, and within this period, the duration of this status has changed three times. Should I follow up on it? Has anyone had a similar experience?

hellestar 2023-03-29

2022.12.06 submitted to journal and with editor (no changes in dates in between)
2023.1.18 under review
2023.2.17 revision (first review completed, three reviewers, 19 comments, given three weeks for revisions)
2023.3.4 with editor
2023.3.20 under review
2023.3.24 required reviews completed
2023.3.27 accepted
(This is the second submission for hydrogen energy. The first submission took two months from submission to acceptance. This time, with a different editor, the process is noticeably slower. Initially, I thought about sending an email to inquire about the progress, but I was concerned that it might increase the chances of rejection. So I patiently waited. It seems that this editor is quite busy. Fortunately, the reviewers were prompt in their evaluations.)

hellestar 2023-03-29

Calm down, it takes a month for my with editor to be reviewed.

Njust 2023-03-28

3.11 with editor, it has been 17 days until now, and it is still in this state.

mozhisha0063 2023-03-27

The proofreading speed is indeed slower than before. Previously, it would take a maximum of one week to proofread after being hired. However, this year, the authorization documents were signed on March 15th, and it has been almost two weeks now, but the proof has not been sent yet.

花火夜空 2023-03-22

This journal has a slower process for proofreading. For the previous two journals I submitted, it took about 1 week to proofread and assign a DOI. But for this journal, it takes two weeks.

wangkai19 2023-03-16

Yes, but before this, I also changed the date, but the status did not change, so I don't remember the date, and I didn't write it down. Please wait a little longer.

月亮彩虹 2023-03-16

May I ask how long have you been with the editor? I have already been with the editor for 20 days.