何弃疗啊哥 2023-02-10

2023.1.28 Submission
2023.1.30 With editor
2023.2.01 With editor
Continuing the long wait, hoping for a positive outcome.

沧海丶 2023-02-09

2022.8.28 submitted to Journal
2022.8.29 with editor
2022.8.30 with editor
2022.9.3 under review
2022.9.14 under review
2022.10.13 minor revision
2022.11.1 with editor
2022.11.4 under review
2022.12.3 minor revision
2022.12.16 submitted
2023.1.26 minor revision
2023.2.8 submitted
2023.2.9 accept
Two reviewers, went through three rounds of revisions. Although the revisions were minor, each reviewer had around twenty to thirty questions in the first two rounds of revisions. One of the reviewers was particularly difficult to deal with, requesting a formula that required the workload equivalent to two to three papers. However, we had to maintain a good attitude in our response. We provided a simple example, and in the end, the editor accepted the paper without sending it for further review. The entire submission process was challenging, and the acceptance at the end was a moment of mixed emotions.

lijunfeng 2023-02-08

2023.02.06 Under Review
2023.02.07 Under Review
I don't know how many reviewers there are.

lijunfeng 2023-02-03

2022.12.20 Under Review
2023.01.06 Under Review
It is indeed very slow...

hff1223 2022-12-19

12.4 Submit modified content
12.6 Under review
12.16 Accept
Very fast speed, hope the journal will continue to improve.

lijunfeng 2022-12-15

2022.11.07 with editor
2022.11.09 with editor
2022.12.15 with editor
Slow...

何弃疗啊哥 2022-12-03

I hope the journal will be better and better.

何弃疗啊哥 2022-11-28

10.06 under review
11.14 minor revision and modification
11.18 resubmitted
11.19 under review
And since then, there has been no news.

hff1223 2022-11-25

2022.10.18 Submission
2022.10.26 Under review
2022.11.03 Under review
2022.11.23 Minor revisions
A relatively fast journal with two reviewers, both of whom provided good feedback.

珍珠奶绿 2022-10-08

The status has changed twice.

珍珠奶绿 2022-10-08

Posted on September 17th, it has been 3 weeks with the editor...

何弃疗啊哥 2022-10-03

Sep 14, 2022 With Editor
Sep 19, 2022 With Editor, status changed once
Today is October 3rd, still With Editor
Has anyone encountered this situation? Is it a bit slow?

cookietang13 2022-09-27

Posted on 20220818, accepted after revision on 20220926, very fast speed.

黄锟腾 2022-09-22

2022.07.22 Submitted
2022.07.31 Under review
2022.08.24 Major revision and modification
2022.09.12 Revised
2022.09.21 Accepted
Overall, the speed is very fast!

Olaf 2022-09-16

The editing process and review speed are both fast. There were two minor revisions by two reviewers in the first review. During the second review, one reviewer ran away, so the editor found a new reviewer and another minor revision was done. After the revision was completed and sent back, it was received within two days.

Olaf 2022-09-16

May 08, Submitted to Journal
May 09, With Editor
May 27, Under Review
Jun 22, Required Reviews Completed
Jul 06, Minor revision and modification
Jul 19, Resubmitted
Jul 19, With Editor
Jul 19, Under Review
Sep 02, Required Reviews Completed
Sep 07, Minor revision and modification
Sep 12, Resubmitted
Sep 13, With Editor
Sep 15, Accepted

Translated text:
May 08, Submitted to Journal
May 09, With Editor
May 27, Under Review
Jun 22, Required Reviews Completed
Jul 06, Minor revision and modification
Jul 19, Resubmitted
Jul 19, With Editor
Jul 19, Under Review
Sep 02, Required Reviews Completed
Sep 07, Minor revision and modification
Sep 12, Resubmitted
Sep 13, With Editor
Sep 15, Accepted

黄锟腾 2022-09-14

Hello, may I ask if all five articles you submitted are minor revisions?

猫猫坏心思 2022-08-27

The first examination took three months, and after returning, it took another month to accept. The second examination has been almost four months... it's really slow! Such bad luck.

Pupu 2022-08-11

Traditional and well-established journals in the field of thermodynamics, which are generally recognized within the industry. The impact factor has been stagnant or even declining, and the journal is not as good as my hard work 0.0...

The first review process is really fast, but the second review process is really slow, and there are really a lot of reviewers (6 reviewers)...

21.10.17: Submitted
21.11.22: Major revision (difficult, two out of six reviewers rejected the paper, luckily the editor gave a chance and requested a major revision)
21.12.11: Revised
21.12.28: Major revision (most reviewers agreed, one of the two reviewers who rejected the paper disappeared, and the other still disagreed, but the rest of the reviewers generally agreed)
22.01.10: Revised (struggled to conduct additional experiments, finally replied in time, couldn't sleep well due to worries)
22.05.29: Accepted (this round was unusually slow, but fortunately, it was accepted)
22.05.31: Proofreading
22.06.08: Online

Sylorn 2022-08-02

Submitted on March 15, 2022, under review in April, received reviewer comments on July 20. The paper was rejected. There were a total of four reviewers, and based on the returned comments, only one reviewer provided detailed suggestions for revisions based on the specific content of the article. The comments from the other three reviewers were more general but still helpful for improving the quality of the paper.

The main reason for rejection was the need for improvement in English writing skills (-_-||). At that time, the final draft was rushed and there was no proofreading of the English. Therefore, if considering submitting to Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. in the future, it is important to thoroughly proofread the English before submission.

Overall, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. is still good, but the review process is a bit long.

米迦芽 2022-07-15

submitted 2021/12/31
with editor 2022/1/14
under review 2022/1/21
under review 2022/5/13 - One person accepted the review
under review 2022/6/9 - Received a review comment
reject 2022/7/14

飞行器 2022-07-01

Classmate, it has been four months since my first review. Do I need to remind them?

Jason 2022-06-30

I submitted about 5 articles. The first three articles took about 1 month for the initial review, followed by approximately half a month for revisions. After submitting, it took about a week to get accepted. The last two articles took about half a month for the initial review, followed by a similar amount of time for revisions. They were accepted about a week after submission. The editors and reviewers were very efficient! I hope the journal continues to improve!

a a a 2022-06-25

After the first review for 7 months, there was only one review comment after the repair. Will a new reviewer be sought for the second review?

飞行器 2022-06-21

Classmate, are you ready to hurry?

流动换热 2022-06-20

Why is it suddenly so slow? I have already submitted for over 3 months, and it has been under review for over 2 months. The date has not changed until now.

飞行器 2022-06-17

Classmate, I also submitted in March. One manuscript was completed in April after review, while another has been under review for over three months. It is currently the slowest journal I have submitted to.

小张 2022-06-16

It has been two and a half months since submission, and there has been no news on the first review. Previously, the journals I submitted to usually returned the results within one month of external review. How long does it usually take for your first review to be completed?

流动换热 2022-06-16

The submission was made in March, and it has been under external review for almost 3 months now. I don't know how much longer it will be reviewed. May I ask, what should I do in this situation, dear experts?

飞行器 2022-05-31

The first reviewer completes the review in about a month, while the second reviewer has been reviewing for nearly three months, which is a bit strange!